Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
MPIDE 1112-4 Interaction design of social media, CIU190
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2012-05-24 - 2012-06-10 Antal svar: 8 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 22% Kontaktperson: Mattias Bingerud»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.8 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 2 | | 25% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 4 | | 50% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 1 | | 12% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 1 | | 12% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.12 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 8 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 0 | | 0% |
75%» | | 0 | | 0% |
100%» | | 8 | | 100% |
Genomsnitt: 5 - I was almost always there. It"s just that one of the teachers wasn"t always there to teach...» (100%)
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?8 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 2 | | 25% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 1 | | 12% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 5 | | 62% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.37 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.6 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 6 | | 100% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?7 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 4 | | 57% |
Yes, definitely» | | 2 | | 28% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 1 | | 14% |
Genomsnitt: 2.57 - First two questions felt relevant and well thought out. The presented a challenge, but tied back to what we had learnt in the course.
The last exam question felt like it belonged in an exam for social science. It simply didn"t feel like it was examining anything that had to do with the course.» (To some extent)
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?8 svarande
Small extent» | | 3 | | 37% |
Some extent» | | 3 | | 37% |
Large extent» | | 1 | | 12% |
Great extent» | | 1 | | 12% |
Genomsnitt: 2 - I felt the lectures didn"t really contribute to anything in the course, though they were interesting. The problem is that they felt more like thought-provoking speeches, and often I wondered what actually we were supposed to learn from them. Besides that, the format of the lectures didn"t contain any material that we could read afterwards or if we missed a lecture.
In addition, the lecturer missed lots of classes without even giving a warning, and we didn"t have many of those to begin with, so it was quite terrible.» (Small extent)
- I"m going to say Large extent, because the teaching from Sus and Malin was great. Nothing to complain about, except for it would be nice to have a bit more in depth tutorial on some of the Dynamics earlier on in the course.
Mathias was fun to listen to, when he showed up. But even then it felt like a collection of fun facts about Social Media, with no real connection to each other or the course.» (Large extent)
7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?8 svarande
Small extent» | | 1 | | 12% |
Some extent» | | 5 | | 62% |
Large extent» | | 2 | | 25% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.12 - Reading the course literature turned out to be useless for the so-called literature sessions, as some were cancelled or moved, and in the last one we didn"t need the literature material at all, so it was a waste of time to read them at that time.» (Some extent)
8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?8 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 4 | | 50% |
Rather well» | | 3 | | 37% |
Very well» | | 1 | | 12% |
Genomsnitt: 2.62 - Well, it was the first time you ran the course. It"s bound to have a few hick-ups.» (Rather badly)
- Twofold, Sus and Malins handouts and attendance to lectures was great, Mathias was late with assignments and cancelled a few lectures. Not ok!» (Rather badly)
- One of the teachers did not manage to hand out his material in time.. It came 2-3 weeks later.» (Rather badly)
- Except for the literature sessions deadlines, which was totally messed up because of the lecturer not showing up.» (Rather well)
- it depents, Lit 2& 4, not so good» (Rather well)
Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?8 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 1 | | 12% |
Rather good» | | 2 | | 25% |
Very good» | | 5 | | 62% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - The lecturer, Mathias Klang, did take a long time to answer emails, or didn"t answer at all.» (Rather poor)
- Very good, Malin or Sus was almost always available for questions. didn"t really have any questions for Mathias.» (Very good)
10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?8 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 1 | | 12% |
Very well» | | 7 | | 87% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.87 11. How was the course workload?8 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 4 | | 50% |
Adequate» | | 4 | | 50% |
High» | | 0 | | 0% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.5 - It was maybe because most of us didn"t quite get the persona project, but the workload was so low that you kinda lost motivation half way.» (Low)
- Too low during the period with a heavy workload during exam. Could be better balanced, preferably with some more added deadlines to the project.» (Low)
- high in the end» (Low)
12. How was the total workload this study period?7 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 1 | | 14% |
Adequate» | | 5 | | 71% |
High» | | 0 | | 0% |
Too high» | | 1 | | 14% |
Genomsnitt: 3.14 - Thesis + other courses is a bad thing.» (Too high)
Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?8 svarande
Poor» | | 3 | | 37% |
Fair» | | 3 | | 37% |
Adequate» | | 2 | | 25% |
Good» | | 0 | | 0% |
Excellent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.87 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - I think the course should have more a design focus» (Poor)
- There was a clear problem of authority between Klang and Lundgren, anarchy to be exact. Klang failed several times to attend to his lectures and to deliver on time the mandatory reading material causing schedule issues for all the students. The answer from Lundgren, the other teacher, was that these problems were Klang responsibility and she could do nothing about it.
» (Poor)
- The course has potential but is still a bit rough around the edges, you could really tell it was the first time it was being held. » (Fair)
- Can be improved in some points, you probably know them already.» (Adequate)
14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- If possible, Sus and Malin. Some form of the persona project.»
- The exercises and home exam format.»
- I think the teachers are quite OK.»
- Persona project but with some modifications, such as weekly deadlines and more focus on trying out and evaluating different social medias. »
- mathias is a good lecturer, but not so good with the paper-stuff»
- Patterns were useful, but there need to be more content.»
- The home exam, as course project, was really interesting and one of the only points where I felt i got some knowledge in the field. »
15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Mathias was fun, but did he really add anything? I dunno, maybe I"m just pissed after having my time wasted repeatedly without as much as an apology.»
- The lectures need to be given by someone more responsible.
The project needs major restructuring as me and my fellow classmates seemed to be struggling with it a lot. Perhaps keeping the same project but with a new approach (not basing personas on fictional characters that many people might not know)»
- The focus of the course, now looks more like a PR course!»
- I think there should be more lecture focusing on analysing and discussing patterns and different social medias rather than the lectures given this year which I personally did not like at all. »
- I leked the persona project, but i think that it should be revised. also the presentations got a bit boring, secend time listen to all the personas»
- Mathias. »
- The persona project was inconsistent, erratic. Also incomprehensible for "all" the students. We needed several e-mails and meetings only to get what was the "aim" of the project. After all is hard to know what we"ve got from investing such an amount of time in the whole project.»
16. Additional commentsGenomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 1.87
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 1.87 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.21
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|