Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
MPWPS 1112-4 Radar systems and applications, RRY080
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2012-05-24 - 2012-06-10 Antal svar: 9 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 56% Kontaktperson: Mattias Bingerud»
Read this before filling in the questionnaireKeep in mind that everyone involved in the course will be able to read your comments. Comments and criticism are welcome, but should remain constructive.
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.9 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 3 | | 33% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 2 | | 22% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 3 | | 33% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 1 | | 11% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.22 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 9 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 1 | | 11% |
50%» | | 2 | | 22% |
75%» | | 3 | | 33% |
100%» | | 3 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 3.88
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?9 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 1 | | 11% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 1 | | 11% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 3 | | 33% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 4 | | 44% |
Genomsnitt: 3.11 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.8 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 7 | | 87% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 1 | | 12% |
Genomsnitt: 2.12 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?By examination we mean laborations, assignments etc., as well as written exams or larger projects.8 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 4 | | 50% |
Yes, definitely» | | 4 | | 50% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.5
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?9 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 2 | | 22% |
Large extent» | | 5 | | 55% |
Great extent» | | 2 | | 22% |
Genomsnitt: 3 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?9 svarande
Small extent» | | 1 | | 11% |
Some extent» | | 3 | | 33% |
Large extent» | | 5 | | 55% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.44 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?9 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 4 | | 44% |
Very well» | | 5 | | 55% |
Genomsnitt: 3.55 - I personally would have liked to have the lecture notes a few days earlier every week» (Very well)
Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?9 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 6 | | 66% |
Very good» | | 3 | | 33% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.33 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?9 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 4 | | 44% |
Very well» | | 5 | | 55% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.55 11. How was the course workload?9 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 7 | | 77% |
High» | | 2 | | 22% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.22 12. How was the total workload this study period?9 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 7 | | 77% |
High» | | 2 | | 22% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.22
Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?9 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 4 | | 44% |
Good» | | 3 | | 33% |
Excellent» | | 2 | | 22% |
Genomsnitt: 3.77 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Home assignments. They really helped me understanding.»
- The homework parts»
- All of the teachers! Exceptional work.»
- The home excercises»
- Lab 1»
15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Actually lab reports. I think they are useless but to do the labs is great. Maybe put a extra home assignment.»
- Slightly more detailed handout solutions to the exercises and demos.»
- Some minor adjustments in the lab PM and the home assignments. Would be good if the questions are formulated more clearly. »
- More formulas on the formula sheet. It"s unreasonable to learn that much by heart. And on the solutions for old exams, and exercises should be more thorough, not just the answers.»
- better guidance in the lab, misunderstandings in the labreport.»
- Lab 2 needs revisement. Too many tasks.»
16. Additional comments- Actually + to teachers. Maciej Soja was OK except that he gave me review for something that i did correct on.
Also the exam were good. I liked it and a bit tricky. I would like to see more SAR questions, they are the interesting ones. From a student perspektiv, we had really really really problem with the ambigiuty functions. Maybe next year, a bit more focus on that. General i would give this course 4.5/5 as grade. Good work.»
- perhaps summary of all different kinds of radar techniques as SAR,doppler,object detection in the end of the course.»
- I would recommend you to focus on Radar only in this course and make a separate SAR-course. This would improve understanding and ability to focus more on radar.»
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|