ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPEPO 1112-4 High voltage technology, MTT040

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-05-16 - 2012-05-24
Antal svar: 15
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 40%
Kontaktperson: Mattias Bingerud»

Read this before filling in the questionnaire

Keep in mind that everyone involved in the course will be able to read your comments. Comments and criticism are welcome, but should remain constructive.

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

15 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 13%
Around 20 hours/week»5 33%
Around 25 hours/week»3 20%
Around 30 hours/week»5 33%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.73

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

15 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 6%
50%»2 13%
75%»5 33%
100%»7 46%

Genomsnitt: 4.2

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

14 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»4 28%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 7%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»6 42%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

12 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»11 91%
No, the goals are set too high»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 2.08

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

By examination we mean laborations, assignments etc., as well as written exams or larger projects.

14 svarande

No, not at all»1 7%
To some extent»5 35%
Yes, definitely»3 21%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»5 35%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent»4 26%
Some extent»5 33%
Large extent»5 33%
Great extent»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent»3 20%
Some extent»9 60%
Large extent»2 13%
Great extent»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.06

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

15 svarande

Very badly»1 6%
Rather badly»2 13%
Rather well»8 53%
Very well»4 26%

Genomsnitt: 3

- More exams need to be uploaded. Better tutorials etc etc etc» (Very badly)
- Some of the concepts are really hard to grasph. Sometimes assupmtions have to made from the slides in order to get to some result» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

15 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 6%
Rather good»5 33%
Very good»8 53%
I did not seek help»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

15 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 6%
Rather well»7 46%
Very well»7 46%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

11. How was the course workload?

15 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 6%
Adequate»5 33%
High»7 46%
Too high»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

12. How was the total workload this study period?

15 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 6%
Adequate»3 20%
High»8 53%
Too high»3 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.86

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

15 svarande

Poor»2 13%
Fair»1 6%
Adequate»5 33%
Good»6 40%
Excellent»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The laborations are good! The study visit to Ludvika. »
- The labs»
- THe Labbs, but do as i HV 1, have the students hand in the report before the labb instead, »
- The study trip to Ludvika and the Comsol parts!»
- The emphasis that is given to labs and projects. Working with Comsol, which is a very nice tool. Everyone"s helpfulness and openness to questions. The good course page organization. The high relevance of guest lectures with the course content. »
- »
- the lecture slides should be improved. I dont know why they only put picture, graphs in the slides..and no explanation.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The lectures is sometimes a little bit boring and hard to follows - a lot of details rather than a bit more overview knowledge.»
- The project takes too much time. More calculating tutorials since half the exam is calculations. 3 teachers writing the exam is never good. »
- The focus of the course has to be better. To many diffrent groups, projects, lab, workshops, demonstations.»
- Please write a compendium. The book is hard to read and it is hard to follow the slideshows when preparing for the exam.»
- It would help if printouts were handed out. Many people are involved in this course and this affects its homogenuity. The initial (scary) electric field calculation examples are not necessary in this course I think. Although the lab and project work in the frame of the course is positive, it might be fair for the projects to contribute to the grade. In several parts the course appears to be a repetition of High Voltage Engineering. The labs are long and include much repetition of doubtful usefulness. »
- Tutorial structure. Put all the topics in order. State about this order in the beginning and probably redo some presentations due to their low educative quality.»
- Because Lab1 takes a lot of time, it should be som questions on it on the exam.»

16. Additional comments

- The exams are too hard in the calculations part considering the small amount of calculations done during the tutorials and the high amount of project work. Make the project work 2.5 credits out of the 7.5. »
- I fellt it was really hard to get the point of this course, what are we soppose to no by its ending. »
- The main benefit from this course for me is the knowledge obtained from the many projects. I enjoyed working with Comsol and I had my questions fully answered by Yuriy and the other supervisors. The teaching was of good quality and the slides were up to the point. The exam was of sensible level and in relation to the taught content. However I believe that there are improvements that can be made (please see above). »
- The goals of the course were scattered. Poor intensity of the course. It was hard to follow tutorial assignments. Tutorials were the weakest point because of absence of tutorial guidance. Should be more examples in the tutorial which may finally intensify the course program.»
- The lecturers are so friendly and nice internal communication among all of them.»
- The workload is very uneven. First three weeks there wasnt much to do, but after the break, there was too much.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från