ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPCOM 1112-4 Multimedia and video communications, SSY150

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-05-24 - 2012-06-10
Antal svar: 17
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 58%
Kontaktperson: Mattias Bingerud»

Read this before filling in the questionnaire

Keep in mind that everyone involved in the course will be able to read your comments. Comments and criticism are welcome, but should remain constructive.

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

17 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»5 29%
Around 20 hours/week»7 41%
Around 25 hours/week»4 23%
Around 30 hours/week»1 5%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.05

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

17 svarande

0%»1 5%
25%»3 17%
50%»6 35%
75%»5 29%
100%»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.23

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

17 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 5%
The goals are difficult to understand»2 11%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»11 64%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 17%

Genomsnitt: 2.94

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

16 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 6%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»14 87%
No, the goals are set too high»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

By examination we mean laborations, assignments etc., as well as written exams or larger projects.

15 svarande

No, not at all»1 6%
To some extent»5 33%
Yes, definitely»8 53%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

17 svarande

Small extent»7 41%
Some extent»8 47%
Large extent»2 11%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.7

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

17 svarande

Small extent»4 23%
Some extent»9 52%
Large extent»4 23%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

16 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»5 31%
Rather well»10 62%
Very well»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- The extra allowed aids allowed at the exam could be stated more clearly in the course memo, not 2 days before the exam. » (Rather badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

17 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»5 29%
Rather good»9 52%
Very good»2 11%
I did not seek help»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.94

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

17 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 5%
Rather well»6 35%
Very well»10 58%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.52

11. How was the course workload?

17 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 5%
Adequate»14 82%
High»2 11%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.05

12. How was the total workload this study period?

17 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 5%
Adequate»10 58%
High»4 23%
Too high»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.41

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

17 svarande

Poor»4 23%
Fair»7 41%
Adequate»4 23%
Good»2 11%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.23

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Lab assignment»
- labs»
- The laboratory work, they are very good stated and gives students a good understanding of the course material. »
- Guess Lecture»
- The course contents were awesome and very interesting. So definitely they have to be preserved. And also guest lecture and lecturer.»
- Lab, Guest Lecture»
- Labs but they need revisement.»
- Labs»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- lecture slides could be more clear»
- The course material. The lecture slides were bad, too sparse and too scattered. It was hard to get the main idea. »
- The teacher.»
- The teacher couldn"t organize the lectures well, so we couldn"t learn much in lecture sessions. Her behavior during student"s presentations was rather badly and her evaluation criterion of those presentations was completely unclear such that she made some decisions during presentations. I can say I felt every thing was disordered in this course. Although, the course itself had great and interesting contents.»
- To start with: The lectures, the only lecture that was intresting was the guest lecture. The presentations. The grading SHALL NOT be said in class so everybody can hear it. Tha grade SHALL NOT be based on how much you speak. The time given (in this case 8 minutes) shall be held. And not like 25 minutes as it were some times. You can"t come a half week before and say that the presentations shall end at 18:00, cause if the schedule says that the lecture ends at 17 then some might plan meetings that can"t be or is hard move.»
- Improve pedagogic skills.»
- More detail to revise the exam»

16. Additional comments

- Very poor use of the English language all round. The lecture slides, the Lab memos, and even the Exam were poorly written, badly formulated and ambiguous in many cases. »
- When TA is speaking, the teacher don"t break please.»
- i don"t like this course»
- The exam required reasonable knowledge in the field. »
- Disordered lectures and literature, non pre-announced rules and offensive behavior during presentation. The course absolutely needs lab sessions.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från