Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
MPBME 1112-4 eHealth, SSY115
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2012-05-21 - 2012-05-27 Antal svar: 17 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 54% Kontaktperson: Mattias Bingerud»
Read this before filling in the questionnaireKeep in mind that everyone involved in the course will be able to read your comments. Comments and criticism are welcome, but should remain constructive.
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.17 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 5 | | 29% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 8 | | 47% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 2 | | 11% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 1 | | 5% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 1 | | 5% |
Genomsnitt: 2.11 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 17 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 0 | | 0% |
75%» | | 4 | | 23% |
100%» | | 13 | | 76% |
Genomsnitt: 4.76
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?17 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 2 | | 11% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 9 | | 52% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 6 | | 35% |
Genomsnitt: 3.11 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.15 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 14 | | 93% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 1 | | 6% |
Genomsnitt: 2.06 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?By examination we mean laborations, assignments etc., as well as written exams or larger projects.15 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 5 | | 33% |
Yes, definitely» | | 5 | | 33% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 5 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 3
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?17 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 5 | | 29% |
Large extent» | | 8 | | 47% |
Great extent» | | 4 | | 23% |
Genomsnitt: 2.94 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?17 svarande
Small extent» | | 2 | | 11% |
Some extent» | | 9 | | 52% |
Large extent» | | 3 | | 17% |
Great extent» | | 3 | | 17% |
Genomsnitt: 2.41 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?17 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 8 | | 47% |
Very well» | | 9 | | 52% |
Genomsnitt: 3.52 - Pingpong works very well.» (Very well)
Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?17 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 4 | | 23% |
Very good» | | 11 | | 64% |
I did not seek help» | | 2 | | 11% |
Genomsnitt: 3.88 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?17 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 5 | | 29% |
Very well» | | 12 | | 70% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.7 11. How was the course workload?17 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 1 | | 5% |
Adequate» | | 16 | | 94% |
High» | | 0 | | 0% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.94 12. How was the total workload this study period?17 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 1 | | 5% |
Adequate» | | 10 | | 58% |
High» | | 5 | | 29% |
Too high» | | 1 | | 5% |
Genomsnitt: 3.35
Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?17 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 1 | | 5% |
Adequate» | | 5 | | 29% |
Good» | | 9 | | 52% |
Excellent» | | 2 | | 11% |
Genomsnitt: 3.7 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- project and home exam»
- The lecture from vinnova!»
- The projects»
- The big diversity in the lecturers.»
- All the guest lectures.»
- The structure and the topics. Perhaps there should be more about applications that already exist and help people and fewer for technical applications such as HL7 and other things like that.»
- more guest lectures about practicle projects, working systems»
- The weekly quizzes, they made you read through the notes/slides one more time so that you really remembered what was said in the lectures.»
15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- reduce the present of quiz»
- more female presenters»
- The weekly questions»
- More technical, less "management course".»
- I think the mandatory presence is not fair, since a student may do other things such as working, or miss some courses. I think that if you attend the lectures, you could be able to avoid the exam, but if you miss a certain number of lectures, then you should definately take it. That would be more fair to my eyes. »
- The questions in the home exam should be more like the first one, were you can show that you have understand the whole picture. The following one was just about finding information.»
16. Additional comments- This course should be put into the first semester»
- Felt like a business management course.»
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|