Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Risk Mangement_SJO266_vt12, SJO266
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2012-03-30 - 2012-04-10 Antal svar: 5 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 15% Kontaktperson: Magda Wilewska-Bien»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.5 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 2 | | 40% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 3 | | 60% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.2 - Combined w. the Maritime Law course, it was good that this was a lightweighter» (At most 15 hours/week)
- I had to spend much of my time studying the topic risk management on my own since the lectures were directed to those working on ships, not to us working ashore. » (Around 25 hours/week)
2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 5 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 0 | | 0% |
75%» | | 0 | | 0% |
100%» | | 5 | | 100% |
Genomsnitt: 5 - read the answer above...» (100%)
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?5 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 1 | | 20% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 2 | | 40% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 2 | | 40% |
Genomsnitt: 3.2 - Difficult to see applicable goals in the beginning.» (The goals are difficult to understand)
- Teacher gave a good outline at the beginning» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)
- The goals were clear, but the lectures itself did not follow the prospect» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)
4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.5 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 1 | | 20% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 4 | | 80% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.8 - At least with a maritime background, this course did not provide very much» (No, the goals are set too low)
5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?5 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 4 | | 80% |
Yes, definitely» | | 1 | | 20% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.2 - The examination was not completed to the date I filled in the answers...» (To some extent)
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?5 svarande
Small extent» | | 1 | | 20% |
Some extent» | | 3 | | 60% |
Large extent» | | 1 | | 20% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 - Lectures from "guest lecturers" other than the main teacher felt out of context.» (Small extent)
- I got new ways of thinking, but the teaching was to some extent too elementary...» (Some extent)
7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?5 svarande
Small extent» | | 4 | | 80% |
Some extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Large extent» | | 1 | | 20% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.4 - Little literature available» (Small extent)
- There were not enoght of books either to borrow or buy.» (Small extent)
8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?5 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 3 | | 60% |
Rather well» | | 2 | | 40% |
Very well» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.4 - Everything was published too late => After the lectures» (Rather badly)
- Pingpong was used adequately» (Rather well)
Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?5 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 2 | | 40% |
Rather good» | | 0 | | 0% |
Very good» | | 1 | | 20% |
I did not seek help» | | 2 | | 40% |
Genomsnitt: 3.6 - Very little since we had so few lectures» (Rather poor)
10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?5 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 1 | | 20% |
Rather well» | | 1 | | 20% |
Very well» | | 3 | | 60% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.4 - Very little since everyone lives in different countries» (Rather poorly)
11. How was the course workload?5 svarande
Too low» | | 1 | | 20% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 3 | | 60% |
High» | | 1 | | 20% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.8 - Lecture workload was fairly okay, but if you wanted to learn more about risk prevention, you had to find more litterature by your own to the course than what it was included on the lectures. This means I had to study much more by my own than I had previously planned» (High)
12. How was the total workload this study period?5 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 3 | | 60% |
High» | | 1 | | 20% |
Too high» | | 1 | | 20% |
Genomsnitt: 3.6 - This was because of the Maritime Law course» (High)
- Too high for those working within shipping but not on ships. I personally have never worked on ships and therefore feel that we should have gone trough the conventions and regulations itself more deeply. Additionally I would have wanted to be able to use my previous competense or my collegues knowledge about risk preventing. I would also wished to go more deeply into risk preventation and assesment out of an economical point of view.» (Too high)
Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?5 svarande
Poor» | | 2 | | 40% |
Fair» | | 1 | | 20% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 20% |
Good» | | 1 | | 20% |
Excellent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.2 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - Teacher/Lecturer had competence but his strucuration of the lectures was fairly slow.» (Fair)
14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Guy is very knowledgeable and should be given more opportunity to lecture.»
- Put more effort in teaching how to calculate risk prevention and how to calculate what small corrections in the early stage, how we may save money in the long run.»
15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- The FMEA teacher needs to retire and/or review his unacceptable stance towards women.»
- more lectures!!»
16. Additional commentsGenomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.2
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.2 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.3
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|