ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Maritime Law_SJO272_vt12, SJO272

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-03-28 - 2012-04-10
Antal svar: 10
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 34%
Kontaktperson: Magda Wilewska-Bien»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

10 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»2 20%
Around 25 hours/week»4 40%
Around 30 hours/week»3 30%
At least 35 hours/week»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

- A lot of reading, but it was good that the demands were high» (At least 35 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

10 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»2 20%
50%»0 0%
75%»1 10%
100%»7 70%

Genomsnitt: 4.3

- Wish I could have joined in Finland because that was important for solving the cases. » (25%)
- Teacher is invaluable. When restructuring the programme, make sure to keep him» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

10 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 30%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»7 70%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

- Unclear what legal material to use» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)
- The course included everything that was appointed on the courseplan (at studieportalen) » (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

10 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»9 90%
No, the goals are set too high»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.1

- Demands are very high, but that"s good» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)
- However it wold have been fun to deal more with real time situations, but I understand at the same time that the timelimit on the courses had not enabled this.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)
- To wide, very interesting but I only got a overview because a lot of the questions covered so much.» (No, the goals are set too high)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

10 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 40%
Yes, definitely»6 60%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

- However it wold have been fun to deal more with real time situations, but I understand at the same time that the timelimit on the courses had not enabled this.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»1 10%
Some extent»2 20%
Large extent»1 10%
Great extent»6 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- As I said I could not attend in Finland and that was important lectures» (Some extent)
- Self study questions combined with lectures formed a nice combined package» (Great extent)
- The teacher was great however slightly too fast, since we speak about jurisdictional problems it would have been more interesting if we had hed more opportunities to express our questions verbally to the teacher in stead of allways missing the breaks when you had that many questions to ask... My solution:Add even at least one additional lecture day..» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 10%
Large extent»7 70%
Great extent»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.1

- Most info is however more accessible via internet which leads to googling. And as we know google and wikipedia is not allways the most trustful sourse...» (Some extent)
- Maritime Law book is very good. Perfect as an aid in maritime law» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

10 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 20%
Rather well»6 60%
Very well»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Powerpoints got up on the page everything else with the page did not work at all...» (Rather badly)
- There could have been more activity on ping pong, got the feeling that the teacher was not "present". » (Rather badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

10 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 10%
Rather good»1 10%
Very good»7 70%
I did not seek help»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- read answer in question number 6.» (Rather poor)
- Teacher responded very quick to pingpong and emails» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

10 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 10%
Very well»8 80%
I did not seek cooperation»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 4

- It could have been better, but its hard to cooperate when all students live in different countries...» (Rather well)
- We formed a studygroup to support eachother» (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

10 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 30%
High»7 70%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

- High, but good» (High)
- Tough to study most of these jurisdictional cases at your own...» (High)
- Since I have little previous experience of maritime law, the work load is probably a litte higher for me. But very rewarding! I now feel quite comfortable in this field compared to before.» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

9 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 33%
High»6 66%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- Since I have little previous experience of maritime law, the work load is probably a litte higher for me. But very rewarding! I now feel quite comfortable in this field compared to before.» (?)
- Luckily the other course was a lightweighter. Had this not been the case, this course would had been too heavy» (High)
- same as in question 11.» (High)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

10 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»3 30%
Good»3 30%
Excellent»4 40%

Genomsnitt: 4.1 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- good course and teacher, but it would have been more interesting to go through more jurisdictial cases or cases students have encountered at work...» (Good)
- Very good course! But it would be nice if we have had more lessons on the first week.» (Good)
- Highest quality course of the programme so far. Make sure to keep Henrik when remaking the programme.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Lecturer.»
- Henrik!»
- Add at least one more "whole day lecture"»
- The general layout of the course with case studies and exam questions.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Maybe couple lessons more.»
- Try to say what law material to use»
- More lectures if possible»
- Some parts of the power point material published on ping pong was in finnish.. Maybe the course home page in ping pong could be a little better organized, and more attended by the teacher. It felt a little abandoned, like a ghost ship ,) »

16. Additional comments

- Keep the lecturer for upcoming years - he was that good!»
- I am happy with the course genarally, since I have learned alot about the subject. Thank you!»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.09
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.09
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.77

Kursutvärderingssystem från