Visa resultat

Production Ergonomics & Work Design, MPP027

--- Your own effort ---

1. Approximately how many hours per week did you work with the course?

12 svarande

At most 10 hours»		0		0%
About 15 hours»		2		16%
About 20 hours»		5		41%
About 25 hours»		2		16%
About 30 hours»		2		16%
At least 35 hours»		1		8%

Genomsnitt: 3.58

- I love reading these atcirles because they"re short but informative.» (About 20 hours)
- To much time was spent on reading and writing the quizes. » (About 30 hours)
- Quizzes and project took a lot of time!» (At least 35 hours)

2. How much of the teaching offered did you attend?

0%»		0		0%
25&»		0		0%
50%»		4		33%
75%»		3		25%
100%»		5		41%

Genomsnitt: 4.08

- I love reading these atcirles because they"re short but informative.» (50%)
- Some of Peters lessons just felt as repetition from previous courses. » (75%)

--- Goals and goal fulfilment ---

3. How understandable are the course goals?

I have not seen/read the goals»		2		16%
The goals are difficult to understand»		2		16%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»		4		33%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»		4		33%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

- I love reading these atcirles because they"re short but informative.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the course goals reasonable considering the number of credits?

Yes I think so»		6		50%
Hesitant»		5		41%
No»		1		8%

Genomsnitt: 1.58

- I love reading these atcirles because they"re short but informative.» (Hesitant)

5. Did the examination format (quizzes + project report) assess whether you have reached the goals?

No, not at all»		2		16%
To some extent»		3		25%
Yes, definitely»		6		50%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»		1		8%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- But answering the quizzes did take a lot of time!» (Yes, definitely)
- I love reading these atcirles because they"re short but informative.» (Yes, definitely)

--- Teaching and course administration ---

6. To what extent has the teaching helped your learning?

Small extent»		4		33%
Some extent»		3		25%
Large extent»		4		33%
Great extent»		1		8%

Genomsnitt: 2.16

- Would have taken none if it existed» (Small extent)
- You always had to read the articles and the book anyway (in order to be able to use references), but you at least had an idea about the articles/the book was going to be about only by attending lectures.» (Some extent)
- Didn"t get the answeres you wanted when you were asking sometimes. » (Some extent)
- I love reading these atcirles because they"re short but informative.» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other course material helped your learning?

Small extent»		5		41%
Some extent»		3		25%
Large extent»		3		25%
Great extent»		1		8%

Genomsnitt: 2

- To much reading and litterature. Don"t have the time to read all.» (Some extent)
- I love reading these atcirles because they"re short but informative.» (Some extent)
- The Zandin book is worthless.» (Large extent)
- It was necessary to read in order to answering the quizzes.» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

Poor»		2		16%
Fair»		4		33%
Acceptable»		2		16%
Good»		0		0%
Excellent»		4		33%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Lab PMs 2 hours before lab, very bad Feedback of quizzes was really bad» (Poor)
- It did take far too long time to get the quiz results, but everything else worked out well I think.» (Fair)
- I love reading these atcirles because they"re short but informative.» (Fair)

--- Laborations and Exercises ---

9. To what extent did Laboration 1 (Manual work load analysis, Feb 1) contribute to your learning?

Did not attend»		0		0%
Small extent»		3		25%
Some extent»		3		25%
Large extent»		6		50%
Great extent»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- I love reading these atcirles because they"re short but informative.» (Small extent)
- The different station could be designed to enlighten the differences between the methods. This was not crystal clear and has not been described completely at the end of the lesson. » (Some extent)
- Good to discuss in the group.» (Large extent)

10. How would you evaluate the workload of Lab 1?

12 svarande

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		2		16%
Appropriate»		7		58%
High»		3		25%
Too high»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.08

- I love reading these atcirles because they"re short but informative.» (High)

11. To what extent did Laboration 2 (Digital human modeling, Feb 15) contribute to your learning?

Did not attend»		1		8%
Small extent»		6		50%
Some extent»		3		25%
Large extent»		1		8%
Great extent»		1		8%

Genomsnitt: 2.58

- I did attend but didn"t learn a thing, waste of time» (Small extent)
- Maybe any kind of handout material could have been good to have, instead of only have a lecture.» (Small extent)
- I love reading these atcirles because they"re short but informative.» (Small extent)

12. How would you evaluate the workload of Lab 2?

12 svarande

Too low»		2		16%
Low»		1		8%
Appropriate»		7		58%
High»		2		16%
Too high»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- Worst lab ever» (Appropriate)
- I love reading these atcirles because they"re short but informative.» (High)

13. To what extent did Exercise 1 (DFA/"Pysen", Jan 23) contribute to your learning?

Did not attend»		0		0%
Small extent»		2		16%
Some extent»		6		50%
Large extent»		3		25%
Great extent»		1		8%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- I love reading these atcirles because they"re short but informative.» (Some extent)

14. To what extent did Exercise 2 (SAM, Jan 30) contribute to your learning?

Did not attend»		0		0%
Small extent»		3		25%
Some extent»		6		50%
Large extent»		3		25%
Great extent»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- I love reading these atcirles because they"re short but informative.» (Small extent)

--- Quizzes ---

15. What did you think about the quizzes as an examination form?

- Good, but bot good connection to books»
- Good on paper, the quiz where not so good thou»
- Good. But it was completely useless since we never got the feedback and you didnt know if you were working in the right direction at all with the next quizzes.»
- Nice, but quite much work to do. Especially since there was project and other group hand-in"s as well.»
- I think they were well made to test students undertanding on work environment. I would not change the level of difficulty of the questions»
- I think it would be better to have every second week instead. »
- Very time consuming but since they only where present the first five weeks I see them as very good!»
- I love reading these atcirles because they"re short but informative.»

16. How much do you think that the quizzes contributed to your learning?

Not at all»		1		8%
A little»		3		25%
Important»		6		50%
Very important, almost crucial»		2		16%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- It made me check the books and serch for more info about the topics. The only problem is regarding the books: some students would like not to buy books. I"m not suggesting to change the course books, but to ask for more books in the library, if possible.» (Important)
- I love reading these atcirles because they"re short but informative.» (Important)
- I really had to read the litterature to answer the questions, so: quite much.» (Very important, almost crucial)

17. How do you evaluate the workload of quizzes for this course?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		1		8%
Appropriate»		4		33%
High»		6		50%
Too high»		1		8%

Genomsnitt: 3.58

- I think I put in approximately 3h per quiz.» (Low)
- I love reading these atcirles because they"re short but informative.» (Appropriate)
- Hard to know the level of passing the quiz.» (High)
- Contributed to a lot of stress.» (High)

--- Project ---

18. What did you think of the project?

19. How much do you feel that the project contributed to your learning?

Not at all»		0		0%
A little»		8		66%
Important»		3		25%
Very important, almost crucial»		1		8%

Genomsnitt: 2.41

- I love reading these atcirles because they"re short but informative.» (A little)

20. FlexQube AB provided the pipes, cubes and screws that were used in your projects. Do you have any feedback on the product for FlexQube to consider?

- I would never use it»
- Not really»
- I love reading these atcirles because they"re short but informative.»

--- Study Climate ---

21. How were the opportunities for asking for help and getting feedback?

Poor»		2		16%
Fair»		2		16%
Good»		4		33%
Very good»		3		25%
Excellent»		1		8%

Genomsnitt: 2.91

- Took long time to get feedback and answer. Was hard for us to get the avix.licens» (Fair)
- I love reading these atcirles because they"re short but informative.» (Very good)

22. How has the cooperation been between you and the other students?

Very bad»		0		0%
Rather bad»		1		8%
Rather good»		4		33%
Very good»		7		58%
I have not tried to cooperate»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- I love reading these atcirles because they"re short but informative.» (Rather bad)

23. How was the total workload during the entire study period?

Too low»		1		8%
Low»		1		8%
High»		7		58%
Too high»		3		25%

Genomsnitt: 3

- I love reading these atcirles because they"re short but informative.» (High)

--- Course Team ---

24. Do you have any constructive feedback for the course team, including guest lecturers?

--- Summarizing questions ---

25. What is your general impression of the course?

Worst course ever»		1		8%
Fair»		7		58%
Good»		0		0%
Excellent»		4		33%
Best course ever»		0		0%
No answer»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.58

- Use what you teach» (Fair)
- But a bit messy?» (Fair)
- it was an intresting course, but the administration was bad so you got tired of it very often. » (Fair)
- I love reading these atcirles because they"re short but informative.» (Fair)

26. Would you recommend this course to others?

Yes»		7		58%
No»		5		41%

Genomsnitt: 1.41