|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Design Thinking, ADM142Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2012-03-16 - 2012-04-16 Antal svar: 7 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 100% Kontaktperson: Saddek Rehal»
Goals and fullfilment of goalsThe learning outcomes are given in the course programme, that is the knowledge, understanding, skills and perspectives you are expectd to reach. Notify for each outcome how well they have been fulfilled.1. Where the aims and objectives of the course clearly formulated?7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.42 - The objectives weren´,t clearly said on purpose so that each student could built his own thought. » (Adequate) 2. Are the aims and goals reasonable in relation to your pre-knowledge ?7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2 Initial Workshops3. How well did the initial workshop work within the overall course?7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.28 - Unconsciously the workshops were the perfect tool for us to reach to a final idea were we enjoyed and potentiate the city (one of the aims of the course) at the same time» (Good) Workshops 1 & 24. How relevant is workshop 1 (exploring a situation, and developing of research questions)7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.28 - Some kind of confusing in the beginning. Really hard to understand the link with the main part of the course... » (Adequate) 5. How relevant is workshop 2 (Creating value, developing innovations)7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.14 - Quite relevant for me. It permited me to have more understanding about what we really were doing and to get clarifications about our main idea...» (Good) Literatur seminar6. Was the literature seminars relevant?7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.71 7. What did you learn and what will you not forget? Please comment!- I have discovered what is the Theory of Design, and this is exactly what I was looking for.»- I think that is too much literature to read and I had difficult to understand the meaning of the texts. It could be better focus in one or two texts.» - i learned alot from the different approaches about the age of science and the age of design that has a great impact on how i will implement the process of the age of design in my research» - Some of them were really interesting, others were quite difficult to follow. (at least the texts). Sometimes, hard to find the link with the main part of the work. Not enough people for the discussions, they rapidly turned around the same topic and became a bit boring...» - I learned more with the lectures than with the seminars, but maybe because some of the texts were a bit hard to understand for me, i mean the way the writers thought and write.» - It was interesting to discover all these intellectuals and their ways of thinking, but sometimes it was a bit too much to assimilate all of the texts. » Lectures8. Are the lectures in general relevant?7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4 9. Wich lecture has be verry instructive for you and that you will not forget?- The introduction lecture about the overall concepts of design, language, conception, vision...»- the lecture of merleau-ponty» - i was very interested about the paradigm studies and the process of research in that lecture.and also the lecture about the perception of artists and designers through the process of creating an artwork.» - The lecture about bodily experience in architecture was really interesting for me. Wrinting abstract lecture really useful. Lecture about Philosophy in Science quite interesting for general knowledge. » - The lecture of Marie was one of the ones that most helped us to develop our work and to know which path we had to follow, how to ask yourself questions about what you really want and how to give value to it is so productive.» - The lecture about "Giving value". It was very instructive and pedagogical.» 10. Wich lecture was not intresting for you and that you have already forgot?- artifacts and artificial science»- The lecture about PHD studies didn"t really captivate me. The lecture of Research in Design was really difficult to follow.» - Actually i don"t remember so good the one of Lisa.» Conference11. How do you rate the conference?7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4 - There was really a lack of more people even doe the feedbacks were kind of useful. I would not call this a conference, the word it"s too big...» (Fair) Education and course administration12. What support have you got from learning staff?7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.28 13. How do you rate the possibilities to get assistance and ask questions? (Workshop consultation).7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.71 - All the teachers were really at our disposal for everything. I really appreciate that. And the fact that we could use different ways of communicate (mail, tel, discussion, knock at the door..) was also good and allowed us some freedom in the organization. » (Good) 14. How has the cooperation between you and students in your group been?7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.57 - No problem.» (Good) Concluding questions15. What is your overall opinion of the course?7 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.28 - Maybe more lectures could bring us even more formal knowledge about Design Theory (guest lecturers for example)» (Good) 16. What was best and should be preserved next year?- Guest lectures»- the freedom of the research» - The process of research has been very interesting and inspirational.» - Freedom in the organization of our work, teachers really at our disposal, » - The helpfulness of the teachers and the lectures where they explain you how you should work, as the one of Marie. Also letting the students think freely as we have done, because like this you can achieve unexpected results.» - The freedom.» 17. What worst and should be changed the nest year?- Giving value, is that really the purpose ?»- less texts.» - Maybe less seminars and more gropu work, were we can share our ideas and comment our projects.» - The number of students.» 18. What can be improved?- More theory would be interesting»- the lectures and more people in the course to have more people to discuss» - the coherence between the different parts of the course (workshops, lectures, seminars...), sometimes I really didn"t know why I was doing something, It sometimes seems that it"s just a juxtaposition of different elements without links...» - As i said maybe it would be good to work more all togetehr at the university.» - The exchanges/communication between the different working groups.»
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0%