ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPCOM 1112-4 Error control coding, advanced level, SSY195

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-05-29 - 2012-05-31
Antal svar: 7
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 100%
Kontaktperson: Mattias Bingerud»

Read this before filling in the questionnaire

Keep in mind that everyone involved in the course will be able to read your comments. Comments and criticism are welcome, but should remain constructive.

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

7 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»2 28%
Around 25 hours/week»2 28%
Around 30 hours/week»3 42%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

7 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»0 0%
100%»7 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

7 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»0 0%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»7 100%

Genomsnitt: 4

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

7 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»7 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

By examination we mean laborations, assignments etc., as well as written exams or larger projects.

7 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»0 0%
Yes, definitely»7 100%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 14%
Large extent»3 42%
Great extent»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»3 42%
Great extent»4 57%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

8. How was the balance between theoretical homework problems and simulations?

7 svarande

Too few simulation problems»1 14%
Just right»5 71%
Too many simulation problems»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2

- There could be added just a small amount of simulations.» (Too few simulation problems)

9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

7 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»2 28%
Very well»5 71%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

- Dropbox updates stopped after some time?» (Very well)

Study climate

10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

7 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 14%
Very good»5 71%
I did not seek help»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 4

11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

7 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 14%
Very well»6 85%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

12. How was the course workload?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»2 28%
High»4 57%
Too high»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

13. How was the total workload this study period?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»2 28%
High»5 71%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

Summarizing questions

14. What is your general impression of the course?

7 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»0 0%
Excellent»7 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The textbook + the selection of topics»
- The course style. »
- Course format. Course literature.»
- Simulations in HW, seminars»
- The course material is complete implying that the book would suffice for a course at this level. »
- The teaching methodology. »

16. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Having an overview of the different coding schemes could be an ongoing project that can be updated with each course: Coding scheme, complexity, advantages, disadvantages, when to use it, etc ... »
- The workload was a bit much »
- More time could be spent on some specific chapters which we had to rush»
- Implementation of turbo decoding maybe helpful.»
- Nothing. »

17. Additional comments

- Very nice course!»
- It was one of the best courses that I have had in Chalmers»
- The distribution of the reading assignment, problems and simulations can be made more uniform. Some weeks had a higher work load.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från