Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Patent and Innovation Engineering 2012, CIP061
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2012-03-14 - 2012-03-21 Antal svar: 5 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 33% Kontaktperson: Anna Tullsten»
Your own effort1. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 5 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 0 | | 0% |
75%» | | 1 | | 20% |
100%» | | 4 | | 80% |
Genomsnitt: 4.8
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.2. How understandable are the course goals?5 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 2 | | 40% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 1 | | 20% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 2 | | 40% |
Genomsnitt: 2.6 3. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?5 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 1 | | 20% |
Yes, definitely» | | 2 | | 40% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 2 | | 40% |
Genomsnitt: 3.2 - It would be good if a larger part of the examination took place later in the course. This would have felt more "fair" in regards to the grade. But for the content of the course was really good!» (To some extent)
Teaching and course administration4. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?5 svarande
Very badly» | | 1 | | 20% |
Rather badly» | | 1 | | 20% |
Rather well» | | 1 | | 20% |
Very well» | | 2 | | 40% |
Genomsnitt: 2.8 - I think overall very well, however some technical struggle during one of the simulations. Then I believe it was a little bit overlap of the content between different lectures and I was sometimes hard to find the red line, probably due to the many different lecturers.» (Very well)
Study climate5. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?5 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 1 | | 20% |
Very good» | | 4 | | 80% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.8 6. How was the course workload?5 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 3 | | 60% |
Adequate» | | 0 | | 0% |
High» | | 2 | | 40% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.8 - I don"t remember exactly but I think I enjoyed the Brand Management course better as it was more dense. » (Low)
- Sometimes there where almost nothing to do and the next week we had several hand-ins during the same week. The workload is fine, but could have been more constant during the course.» (High)
Lectures7. Technology management and organizations (ME)4 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 25% |
Good» | | 3 | | 75% |
Excellent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.75 8. The IA/IP approach pt 1 & pt 2 (UP)4 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 25% |
Good» | | 1 | | 25% |
Excellent» | | 2 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 4.25 9. Leveraging IPR assets (HR)3 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 0 | | 0% |
Good» | | 2 | | 66% |
Excellent» | | 1 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 4.33 10. Patent landscaping (Thomson)4 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 1 | | 25% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 25% |
Good» | | 0 | | 0% |
Excellent» | | 2 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 3.75 11. Patents in manufacturing industries (MJ, SKF)4 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 1 | | 25% |
Adequate» | | 0 | | 0% |
Good» | | 2 | | 50% |
Excellent» | | 1 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 3.75 12. Patents in pharma (AJ, Awa)4 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 2 | | 50% |
Good» | | 1 | | 25% |
Excellent» | | 1 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 3.75 13. Patents litigation (MP, Wistrand)4 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 25% |
Good» | | 1 | | 25% |
Excellent» | | 2 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 4.25 - Very interesting! It felt like a really important topic that we had not really discussed in detail before this lecture.» (Excellent)
14. Drafting license agreements (MAQS)4 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 0 | | 0% |
Good» | | 2 | | 50% |
Excellent» | | 2 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 4.5 15. Patents in telecom (MH, Ericsson)4 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 25% |
Good» | | 0 | | 0% |
Excellent» | | 3 | | 75% |
Genomsnitt: 4.5 16. Markets for patents and patent-based business models (MM, Immendo)4 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 25% |
Good» | | 0 | | 0% |
Excellent» | | 3 | | 75% |
Genomsnitt: 4.5
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|