Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Computer aided modeling, advanced (2012), MPP020

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-03-14 - 2012-04-02
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 39%
Kontaktperson: Oskar Rexfelt»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

11 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»2 18%
Around 25 hours/week»6 54%
Around 30 hours/week»2 18%
At least 35 hours/week»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.18

- Alot of scheduled hours, but that was just good.» (Around 20 hours/week)
- Basically spent 8-12 hours a day (4-5 days a week) for this course, more in the start because I had to refresh my memory for Alias Automotive.» (At least 35 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

11 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»2 18%
100%»9 81%

Genomsnitt: 4.81

- 75% because I missed the two initial weeks because I had to finish another semester abroad. » (75%)
- Good lectures, the pdf"s are sometimes too brief.» (100%)
- Inte precis 100%, men närmare 100 än 75%. Det kanske borde finnas lite fler alternativ på den här skalan» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

11 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»5 45%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»0 0%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»6 54%

Genomsnitt: 2.63

- I dont remember them now» (I have not seen/read the goals)
- Have not read.» (I have not seen/read the goals)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

7 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»6 85%
No, the goals are set too high»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.14

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

8 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»0 0%
Yes, definitely»7 87%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.12

- To prepare for the different examinations/presentations were really helpful. It was very inspiring to see the others work, and see how the same product (a car) could be made using different methods. » (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»7 63%
Great extent»4 36%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

- Great help during exercise!» (Large extent)
- Without the teachings, it was very difficult to work on the project (solely based on the tutorials). » (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»3 27%
Some extent»5 45%
Large extent»2 18%
Great extent»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.09

- I would really have liked a book though, instead of just pdf"s. » (Some extent)
- Instruction PDFs could be a bit clearer» (Some extent)
- ppt-presentations were good, but so much information that they were difficult to go throught afterwards.» (Some extent)
- I det här fallet räknar jag Håkans pdf:er som litteratur» (Some extent)
- Great PDF"s» (Large extent)
- Tutorials were needed. Needed tutorials+teachings in order to complete the course.» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

11 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»7 63%
Very well»4 36%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

- Kursen hade ju lite nytt innehåll i år, så jag tror att materialet kommer vara ännu bättre anpassat nästa år.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 9%
Rather good»3 27%
Very good»7 63%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.54

- Somewhere between poor and good. The problem was that I needed help a lot, like everyone.» (Rather poor)
- When it got close to a hand-in it could sometimes take 1 hour to get help, which is to much.» (Very good)
- Håkan was very helpful and there was opportunities to call him and ask for help when it was off-lecture time. » (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

11 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»4 36%
Very well»7 63%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

11. How was the course workload?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 36%
High»4 36%
Too high»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- An even fairly high load - different for different participants due to prior skills, level of ambition etc» (Adequate)
- not that much possibility to decide that on your own, as it use to be in a 3,4 or 5-course.» (Too high)
- Mostly because the software did not want to cooperate. Spent evenings and nights, even if I worked efficiently during days.» (Too high)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 27%
High»6 54%
Too high»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

11 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 9%
Adequate»1 9%
Good»4 36%
Excellent»5 45%

Genomsnitt: 4.18 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Very nice that we got a chance to do different cars - not only Audi tt. Not too enthusiastic about the film editing part. Fun yes but not relevant for our future work..» (Good)
- Now i know Alias, but I am quite tired.» (Good)
- Learnt a lot.» (Good)
- It built on the previous Alias course. I really liked having this as well, as I feel I really know Alias now, which I didn"t know earlier as well. » (Excellent)
- Interesting and developing, but a lot of work if there were any problems with the program.» (Excellent)
- Perfect combination of educational lectures and fun project where the knowledge is applied. » (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Showcase was super good! I loved using that!»
- The car-project in general. It was fun to work with something throughout the entire course.»
- That we could chose which car we wanted to model in each group! The animation was fun, and the posters where also a good way of presenting your work.»
- Different car models to model, maybe even different products of the -approx- same difficulty, quality requirements etc»
- Att man får göra flera olika bilar. Det blir mer intressant att höra om vilka utmaningar de andra har haft då.»
- Car modelling, because it does teach you a lot. Animation was good to learn a bit about as well.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Maybe you could recommend people to use a car that actually exists in Sweden, simply because it would be so nice to be able to see it in reality as well, after spending so much time on it in the computer»
- The first weeks assignment did not seem relevant to the rest of the project and the results were not that great. Might have been more helpful to use that time for the "real" car later.»
- Maybe to have some more time to focus on finishing before the hand-in, since some lectures where held just a day before the hand in and you could not therefor plan how to use that knowledge in your project.»
- Film editing part, especially as it requires software that leads to us no longer having Indesign in the computer room - a program that we use and will use far more often than premiere or audition»
- Have the possibility to set the working load level.»
- Ingenting speciellt. Vore bra med lite mer detaljerade pdf:er så att det är lättare att ta igen på egen hand om man missar något.»
- Focus rendering in showcase instead, because you get much better results with less amount of time. (The materials balls could be rendered in Alias for practice.)»

16. Additional comments

- Good course! Intense but good!»
- It would be helpful if there could be a way to "get around" a few problems so that one can still work with the most recent task as you might forget soon if your are far behind with your model.»
- Very good course! I have learned alot, lecturer has helped alot during lessons with project work, and the project it self was fun and ended up with really good results (higher quality of the finished cars than I would have thought)»
- Good lectures - good insight to how different surfaces are constructed»
- Håkan är inte bara en duktig och pedagogisk lärare, han är också en trevlig person!»
- Credz to Håkan for being patient with us!»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.18

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.18
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.79

Kursutvärderingssystem från