ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

SPPI, KSK061

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-05-10 - 2008-06-10
Antal svar: 6
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 60%
Kontaktperson: Tobias Richards»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Klass: Övriga

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

6 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»4 66%
Around 20 hours/week»2 33%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.33

- The CFD course took almost all my time.» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

6 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»2 33%
100%»4 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.66

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

6 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 16%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»5 83%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

6 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 16%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»5 83%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.83

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

6 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 33%
Yes, definitely»1 16%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»3 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 50%
Large extent»2 33%
Great extent»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- Was not always clear what is meant during the lectures. » (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»2 33%
Some extent»3 50%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Articles where to long, just a small part dealt with the subject and sometimes not usefull.» (Small extent)
- Too much extra material... hard to know what to read and what not to read. hard to know how detailed to read. mostly stressing, but not much learning.» (Small extent)
- Some of the articles are really difficult to read.» (Some extent)
- The literature: papers and electronic books were really good, especiall for the mass exchange part and exergy» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

6 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»3 50%
Very well»3 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

6 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 16%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»5 83%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

6 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 16%
Rather well»0 0%
Very well»5 83%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

11. How was the course workload?

6 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»6 100%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

12. How was the total workload this study period?

6 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 33%
Adequate»3 50%
High»0 0%
Too high»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3

- CFD took too much time.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

6 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 16%
Good»5 83%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

- The content of the course was a little mixed up. A clear sturcture was missing sometimes. » (Adequate)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- the projects the assignments»
- The assignment for MEN was very helpful. Also the HEN was good.»
- The projects and assignments. But maybe with some minor changes.»
- exercises in hysis»
- More clearance what to read for the exam.»
- The assignments and the projekts were really good for learning. »

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- maybe set more time so the lectures won"t be so rushed and we can see the information more easily instead of trying to cover a lot of material in one single class»
- The assignment about exergy calculation didn"t help. Just filling in the excel sheet wasn"t good for learning the subject. Maybe smaller assignment, but without prepared excel file so that you have to calculate the things your own»
- Maybe more lectures (räkneövningar) where calculations examples can be made, with mass integration and exergy. Study visits are also often good for learning.»
- i didnt learn much from assignments... it would have been much better to have "exam-like" problems instead.»
- Course material at some extend.»

16. Additional comments

Kursutvärderingssystem från