ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Hybrid vehicles and control 2012, TME095

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-03-12 - 2012-03-30
Antal svar: 30
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 56%
Kontaktperson: Sven Andersson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Maskinteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

30 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 6%
Around 20 hours/week»6 20%
Around 25 hours/week»16 53%
Around 30 hours/week»4 13%
At least 35 hours/week»2 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.93

- Howeverm a lot more in study week 6 and 7 due to a very time consuming second assignment.» (Around 25 hours/week)
- Around 20h first half and around 30h the second half of the course.» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

30 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 3%
75%»15 50%
100%»14 46%

Genomsnitt: 4.43

- I missed 6 hours of lecture» (100%)
- about 90» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

30 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»4 13%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»11 36%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»15 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.23

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

26 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 3%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»25 96%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.96

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

28 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 14%
Yes, definitely»21 75%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»3 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.96

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

29 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 13%
Large extent»17 58%
Great extent»8 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.13

- I would say that I learned most from the assignments and it was good that there was so much scheduled time for these. » (Some extent)

7. What did you think about the different teachers/lecturers?

Matrisfråga

- Anders Grauers really is a great teacher!! »
- Would be good to have more assistants that can identify problems in Simulink. Felt like we got a very good understanding of what the problem was in reality but then it was another problem understanding how to implement it into the software.»

Sven Andersson
30 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»2 6%
Good»6 20%
Very good»22 73%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 4.66

Anders Grauers
30 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»1 3%
Good»7 24%
Very good»21 72%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 4.68

Jonas Fredriksson
29 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»4 16%
Good»10 41%
Very good»10 41%
No opinion»5

Genomsnitt: 4.25

Daniel Härensten
29 svarande

Very poor»1 4%
Poor»1 4%
OK»6 27%
Good»7 31%
Very good»7 31%
No opinion»7

Genomsnitt: 3.81

Patrik Wåhlin
29 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»1 3%
OK»8 30%
Good»9 34%
Very good»8 30%
No opinion»3

Genomsnitt: 3.92

Torbjörn Thiringer
29 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»2 8%
OK»3 12%
Good»6 25%
Very good»13 54%
No opinion»5

Genomsnitt: 4.25

Jens Groot
30 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»1 3%
OK»4 14%
Good»9 32%
Very good»14 50%
No opinion»2

Genomsnitt: 4.28

8. What did you think about the assignments?

Matrisfråga

- Learnt alot, using simulink is great!»
- Make asignmet 1 smaller (less time) and more time for assssignment 2»
- 1) There was to much trial and error needed in the simulink programs. The control stratgies could be gone through on a lecture when it comes to both the series and parallel hybrid about different controls of power sources and battery charging could be done via Simulink. 2) The hand-in of the first assignment should be ealier. It is not enough to just say that assignment 2 takes a lot time. Students are not that smart... »
- for assignment 1 there was less motivation because it has no effect on the grade.»
- Too little time on assignment 2. Should have had the deadline for assignment 1 earlier.»
- A lot of effort was put on dealing with the control strategy for the second assignment. I think this is more a Simulink issue that requires a lot of useless effort that does not contribute to the learning scope of the course.»

Assignment 1
30 svarande

Very poor»1 3%
Poor»0 0%
OK»5 16%
Good»15 50%
Very good»9 30%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 4.03

Assignment 2
30 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»1 3%
OK»5 16%
Good»10 33%
Very good»14 46%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 4.23

9. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

30 svarande

Small extent»2 6%
Some extent»10 33%
Large extent»15 50%
Great extent»3 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.63

- The book only has small content that is useful. Otherwise it has a lot of equations that are hard and useless to follow.» (Small extent)
- The equations presented in the book was not needed for the completion of the assignments» (Some extent)
- Good but expensive book.» (Large extent)

10. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

30 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»21 70%
Very well»9 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

- Better structure of the handouts on the course homepage would be nice.» (Rather well)

Study climate

11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

29 svarande

Very poor»1 3%
Rather poor»1 3%
Rather good»8 27%
Very good»18 62%
I did not seek help»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 3.58

- Hard to find the teachers except Sven.» (Rather poor)
- Could be hard to get in touch with the others except Sven. Mail worked okey.» (Rather good)
- Again, since there was a lot of scheduled "exercises" it was easy to discuss with both assistants and other students.» (Very good)

12. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

30 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»2 6%
Rather well»9 30%
Very well»17 56%
I did not seek cooperation»2 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

- Same as 11.» (Very well)

13. How was the course workload?

29 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»19 65%
High»8 27%
Too high»2 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.41

- Almost too high the last two weeks.» (High)
- It was too "ending heavy" meaning that the last two weeks where to crouded with assignments compared with the first half which was too calm.» (High)

14. How was the total workload this study period?

30 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 3%
Adequate»14 46%
High»13 43%
Too high»2 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

- But too high the last two weeks (having the RVAD course beside this one)» (Adequate)
- Same in both courses, read RVAD and Hybrid, both where "ending heavy".» (High)

Summarizing questions

15. What is your general impression of the course?

30 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»3 10%
Good»16 53%
Excellent»11 36%

Genomsnitt: 4.26 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Interesting and useful course!» (Good)
- A course i thought might be boring beforehand, but it has really opened my eyes for hybrids and totally changed my view on this subject. Great course.» (Excellent)
- It shows the complexity in hybridization and one way of simulating the behaviour of a hybridized vehicle.» (Excellent)

16. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- assignment 2 »
- Anders Grauers! He alone »
- The teachers, the assignments and the lecture/exercise hours distribution.»
- Anders lectures about control theory»
- 1) The exam as it where, not mid-term. 2) The assignments, but they should be changed some. 3) The lecturers »
- Assignment 2»
- The different lecturers, all of them were excellent. The assignments.»
- More controlls, less electric, i am no electrical engineer and don"t want to be one. I think it is okay to read a load map but the mechanisms of electrical motors are irrelevant. ( I do not want to build a motor, i want to use it)»
- The entire assignments were very good and should be preserved for next year»
- QSS assignment II»
- Everything»
- Anders grauers. Extremelly pedagogical and helpful teacher. »
- Anders Grauers»
- Anders Grauers" and Torbjörn Thiringer"s lectures.»
- Sven Andersson and Anders Grauers! »

17. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- assigment 1 made it as a commun exercise with the teachers like this, we can learn how we can use Qss»
- Maybe someone who knows Simulink very well would be nice to have in the course staff.»
- More help from people familiar with simulink.»
- 1) There should be an outline what should be part of the different hybrid configurations. Such as if there should be a control of torque, re-charging etc. 2) Anders should that it a bit slower when he draws his diagrams on the black board. He is sometimes to fast. 3) The hand-in of assignment 1 should be one week earlier.»
- Nothing really.»
- less electric motors»
- The only bad part is that i feel the course should be offered after power train mechanics to have a better understanding.»
- No comments»
- More teaching sessions on SIMULINK»
- A more clearer goal of the assignment 2. It was hard to know how much effort you should put into it. »
- Assignement 2»
- Different lecturers for batteries and transmissions. Also, another extra assistant for the computer sessions (the one that was there when Sven was out of town was really good!).»
- If you really want to have a such late deadline for the Ass1, then you really need to look over how you can get the students to start earlier with Ass2. Otherwise I recommends to move the deadline so it"s at least one week earlier.»

18. Additional comments

- Keep up the good work!»
- Great course! Felt like a very "up-to-date" topic.»
- There was some confusion in assignment 2 regarding simulink modeling that can probably be solved by some additional information.»
- Very nice course»
- I enjoyed the course very much»
- Sven is a really great teacher!»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.26
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.26
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.81

Kursutvärderingssystem från