Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Operations Strategy, TEK156

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-03-12 - 2012-04-12
Antal svar: 23
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 57%
Kontaktperson: Mats Winroth»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Industriell ekonomi 300 hp
Klass: Övriga
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Industriell ekonomi 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

23 svarande

0%-25%»1 4%
25%-50%»7 30%
50%-75%»4 17%
75%-100%»11 47%

Genomsnitt: 3.08

General questions on the course

2. What is your general opinion of the course?

23 svarande

Very negative»0 0%
Negative»5 21%
Neutral»6 26%
Positive»10 43%
Very positive»2 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.39

3. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

23 svarande

Small extent»6 26%
Some extent»13 56%
Large extent»2 8%
Great extent»2 8%

Genomsnitt: 2

4. How was the course workload?

23 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Adequate/Low»10 43%
Adequate/High»13 56%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.56

5. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

23 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 4%
Rather good»7 30%
Very good»8 34%
I did not seek help»7 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.91

6. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

23 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 4%
Rather well»13 56%
Very well»9 39%

Genomsnitt: 3.34

Summarizing questions

7. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The project was a good opportunity to learn»
- the case as a practical use of the os-matrix »
- The report»
- Project»
- The case was good, but when you ask questions outside supercvision, you must get an adequate answer. It is better for you to say that you can not answer that at that point than answering something that is not true. Good that we got the reflections back before exam.»
- The lean game, the project»
- The book»
- student leading literature seminars »
- Most course content was relevant»
- the seminars»
- The case,as a application of the theory. That the seminars are to be hold by the students is also a good feature. »
- Group Project»
- The case was interesting.»
- Nice to do projects at real companies.»

8. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- less focus on the academic part of the articles and more on their implications for practisioners.»
- The lectures!»
- The way the seminars are carried out or more specifically, the 1000 word reflections that follows when a student miss one occasion. This feels more like a punishment or scare tactic rather than something useful. Instead of spending this much time on the articles, the project could be more substantial.»
- The 1000 words per article if you are not attending. When the schedule comes that late it is not fair workload for missing a seminar, especially when it becomes so different for missing different seminars. It would be more fair to demand 2000 or 2500 words per seminar. »
- 1. more practical examples, lecture with someone from a company working with OS would help 2. the seminars were too long and too uninspired. It would be so much better if Mats designed questions to reflect upon (like in Ida"s course) and then we could start the discussion with those. Also, 3 hours is way too much! 3. the exam was a little weird with the first 3 questions giving as many points as the last two but with half the space. So everybody just ended up pushing in as many words as possible on the 3 first questions instead of trying to write nicely. 4. the project was good but it would have been better to just have a "dugga" instead of an exam and give more points for the project because that was pretty much where i learnt what I know in this course»
- The general organisation of the case. A demand to find a company that early means you might rush that decision and end up with a bad choice leading to a bad report.»
- the time of the literature seminars, sometime not well scheduled, wasting a lot of time.»
- The project. Hard to find a suitable company. The lectures didn"t provide anything.»
- I don"t think I will have so much use for the articles about knowledge, nonaka etc»
- more should be discussed about the models in the book by slack about how they work in real life adaptation, in companys and more, maybe at the end of the course before the presentation or at the end of the final presentations »
- That you will be less bound by your collective team"s efforts.»
- The more academic articles in the seminars did not add to the learning outcome from the course. »
- Review the articles used in Seminars»
- The litterature seminars. They did not give anything. There must be some kind of guidelines for the reflections. One suggestion for better litterature seminars is to have prepared questions to answer beforehand. Another suggestion is that the teachers are responsible for the litterature seminare, discussing the questions handed out beforehand.»
- More real-life examples during lectures, more guest lectures. Perhaps include service management as well. The seminars should be in some other form, perhaps clearer guidelines are required. Some articles should be changed. Be told that numbered headlines are required for the report. Since it could be fixed in 2 seconds it feels a bit harsh to loose a point over it.»

9. Additional comments

- Lectures were too poor, the report to wide, it need delimitations»
- It would be nice if the teachers show more interest both in the topic and in the students. I did not feel that the teachers really were interested in being there.»
- more games like the lean game»
- Do please include some kind of grading to the seminar reports or omit them completely.»
- no»
- The project and group work was a struggle since most of the group was really unmotivated and didn"t care nor finished their appointed tasks on time or with quality.»
- In future more focus on the application of the gained knowledge rather then simply repeating it. Not only to name three perspectives on trade-offs but instead to discus how the notion of trade-offs are important in the practical context. »
- The teachers feels detached to the course. More well-planned lectures. »
- Didn"t learn much more during the seven weeks than I did during the Operation Strategy week of the TEK145 course (QOM). Had higher expectations of the course The two courses in study period 2 (Design for Quality and Integrated Product Development) had a better balance (and the seminars gave more as well).»

Kursutvärderingssystem från