Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Superconductivity and low-temperature physics, FMI036, Q3-12

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-03-12 - 2012-03-25
Antal svar: 15
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 75%
Kontaktperson: Erika Thorsell»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

15 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»4 26%
Around 20 hours/week»7 46%
Around 25 hours/week»3 20%
Around 30 hours/week»1 6%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.06

- less» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

15 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»9 60%
100%»6 40%

Genomsnitt: 4.4

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

15 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 6%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 20%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»11 73%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

14 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»13 92%
No, the goals are set too high»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.07

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

14 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»7 50%
Yes, definitely»7 50%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

Teaching and course administration

6. How well was the lecturer(s) prepared, in your opinion?

15 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»9 60%
Excellent»6 40%

Genomsnitt: 4.4

- It will be good to pass the notes to computer typed text and correct some mistakes in the lectures.» (Good)

7. How well was the lab-assistan(s) prepared, in your opinion?

15 svarande

Poor»1 6%
Fair»2 13%
Adequate»4 26%
Good»4 26%
Excellent»4 26%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

- The equipment was not tested and did not function during the lab (Josephson Junction).» (Poor)
- The lab in Josephson device was not well prepared.» (Adequate)

8. What was your impression of the lab exercises?

15 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 6%
Adequate»3 20%
Good»8 53%
Excellent»3 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.86

- In the Josephson lab things did not work propertly» (Adequate)
- Good labs, poor preparation.» (Adequate)
- very interesting moments» (Excellent)

9. What was your impression of the homework exercises ?

15 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 13%
Adequate»6 40%
Good»6 40%
Excellent»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- yeah, it was ok, but can be harder» (Fair)
- You can try to put some thinking question in it. Like the first question of the exam.» (Fair)
- Too easy» (Adequate)
- Did not do all, but the ones I did were fairly simple.» (Adequate)

10. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 13%
Large extent»7 46%
Great extent»6 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.26

- Very good fallow up of the students questions and very detailed explanation with examples.» (Great extent)

11. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent»1 6%
Some extent»6 40%
Large extent»5 33%
Great extent»3 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- The recommended book was hard to get hold on. Did not exist in adequate numbers at Cremona.» (Some extent)
- A bit too few comments in the lecture notes. Mostly just formulas and no reconnection on the system in words. Some small comments would be appriciated» (Large extent)
- The two recommended readings give both of them very good contrast to the analyzed problems (explain the sames thins in different ways)» (Great extent)

12. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

15 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»7 46%
Very well»8 53%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

Study climate

13. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

15 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»3 20%
Very good»9 60%
I did not seek help»3 20%

Genomsnitt: 4

14. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

15 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»5 33%
Very well»9 60%
I did not seek cooperation»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.73

15. How was the course workload?

15 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 6%
Adequate»12 80%
High»1 6%
Too high»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.13

- Lecture notes are handwritten and are very compressed, if you have a look at the topics in one of the books to understand it it"s a lot of stuff that should be known» (Too high)

16. How was the total workload this study period?

15 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 6%
Adequate»9 60%
High»5 33%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.26

Summarizing questions

17. What is your general impression of the course?

15 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 6%
Good»7 46%
Excellent»7 46%

Genomsnitt: 4.4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Interesting subject, good planning, fairly good teaching» (Good)
- Even with the problems in Josephson Lab the course by itself was wonderful!!!! you learn a lot and is incredible how tangible becomes the theory after the course.» (Excellent)

18. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Everything»
- Lectures methodology (to solve derivations in green board) Helium Lab»
- The two labs are pretty helpful to understand the lecture contents»
- The exercises, and that the most lectures are demonstrated on the black board.»
- Everything worked really good»
- practicum»
- The labs and exercises.»

19. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Some more explanations in the lecture notes. Per explains very well during the lecture but when it is over, these are lost from my memory»
- Preparation of the Josephson Lab and if possible the handwritten notes should be converted to a cleaner version. »
- the power point lectures. better to give less but more important information on the black board.»
- homework, see comment»

20. Additional comments

- Only two lectures on HTS is kind of too short to explain the concept clear»
- no»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.4

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.4
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.85

Kursutvärderingssystem från