Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Production flow management, TEK435

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-03-10 - 2012-03-26
Antal svar: 30
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 60%
Kontaktperson: Lars Medbo»

1. On average, how many hours per week have you spent on the course, both individual work as well as lectures, seminars etc.?*

30 svarande

0 hours»0 0%
5 hours»1 3%
10 hours»4 13%
15 hours»8 26%
20 hours»7 23%
25 hours»6 20%
30 hours»3 10%
35 hours»0 0%
40 hours»1 3%
45 hours»0 0%
50 hours»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4.9

2. On average, how much of the total education have you participated in?*

30 svarande

0%»0 0%
10 %»0 0%
20%»0 0%
30%»1 3%
40%»1 3%
50%»0 0%
60%»1 3%
70%»3 10%
80%»4 13%
90%»8 26%
100%»12 40%

Genomsnitt: 9.6

- Could unfortunately only participate during the mandatory sessions. » (30%)

3. On average, how much time have you spent on each of the four literature seminars (time to be prepared for each seminar plus the time spent at the seminar)?*

30 svarande

0 hours»0 0%
2,5 hours»3 10%
5 hours»11 36%
7,5 hours»9 30%
10 hours»4 13%
12,5 hours»1 3%
15 hours»2 6%
17,5 hours»0 0%
20 hours»0 0%
22,5 hours»0 0%
25 hours»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

4. On average, how much time have you spent on the the case assignment?*

30 svarande

0 hours»0 0%
2,5 hours»1 3%
5 hours»3 10%
7,5 hours»3 10%
10 hours»8 26%
12,5 hours»2 6%
15 hours»9 30%
17,5 hours»0 0%
20 hours»4 13%
22,5 hours»0 0%
25 hours»0 0%
30 hours»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 5.8

- Hard to say but I will guess 20h. I have included the time for the case seminars. » (20 hours)

5. How understandable are the learning outcomes of the course?*

30 svarande

I haven’,,t read the learning outcomes»4 13%
The learning outcomes were difficult to understand»0 0%
Rather good, but could have been clearer»10 33%
Clearly showed me what to learn in the course»16 53%

Genomsnitt: 3.26

- I especially liked the summary slides from the last lecture.» (Clearly showed me what to learn in the course)

6. Did the examination (seminars and group assignments) test if you have achieved the learning outcomes?*

30 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»6 20%
Yes, to large extent»22 73%
I don’,,t know»2 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.86

- I liked the type of examination and i thought that the seminars was a good way to learn and get a better understanding of what the course was all about» (Yes, to large extent)

7. To which extent have the lectures contributed to your learning?*

30 svarande

To very small extent»0 0%
To small extent»0 0%
To some extent»10 33%
To large extent»19 63%
To very large extent»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

- Good lectures as well as the guest lectures.» (To large extent)

8. To which extent have the course literature and other course materials contributed to your learning?*

30 svarande

To very small extent»1 3%
To small extent»3 10%
To some extent»11 36%
To large extent»14 46%
To very large extent»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

- I liked the fact that the course books describe how to do in practise. But I do not think that the books were that connected to the lectures. » (To some extent)
- I didn"t read the course literature that much, I thought the articles was more interesting.» (To some extent)
- Most of the Baudin"s books content were just useful to write the assignements reports and not to the exam. Some of the chapters were quite important, but other were not when studying to the final examination.» (To some extent)
- it"s nice to have articles as well as the book, this gives a better insight into the topics covered.» (To large extent)
- Very good articles!» (To large extent)

9. To which extent have the seminars and seminar tasks contributed to your learning?*

30 svarande

To very small extent»0 0%
To small extent»1 3%
To some extent»3 10%
To large extent»12 40%
To very large extent»14 46%

Genomsnitt: 4.3

- some of the articles weren"t that good» (To large extent)
- Seminars with prepared hand in before is a great way to learn! » (To very large extent)
- I think this is a perfect way of examination, the only thing I think is that it in some way could be done so that everyone is forced to give their thought. Sometimes it felt like that some students just sat at the seminar for one hour and went home instead of participating in the discussion.» (To very large extent)
- Very good seminars.» (To very large extent)
- See comment above. However I think that the teacher should be the moderator and force the students to speak more and elaborate their thoughts. it is easy for a student to just sit by and say nothing and till pass.» (To very large extent)
- The seminars should be maintained. They are really good for understanding the course content.» (To very large extent)

10. To which extent have the group assignments (MFM case and Shop floor execution and control) contributed to your learning?*

30 svarande

To very small extent»0 0%
To small extent»3 10%
To some extent»19 63%
To large extent»6 20%
To very large extent»2 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.23

- They lectures were good, but most of the discussed issues were studied in the OPC course. Probably the lectures could be focused more on the assignement type questions. Those questions were really important.» (To small extent)
- The MFM was hard to understand. I liked the fact that we learned a tool that we can use when we work but it would be good to have some literature or more lecture regarding how to perform the MFM. Maybe, we can do a exercise where Lars have the "right" answer so we can compare our result with the key. » (To some extent)
- I really liked the movies and it was a great way to learn and get a visual picture of the actually flow. How ever I thought that the first and second part was very much alike and there was some copy past. I think that the two cases should be merged together to one bigger assignment» (To some extent)
- The shop floor assignment could have been better, I think fewer and broader questions would open up for more discussions within the group than so many small questions.» (To some extent)
- However, it was a bit annoying at first to only have a video but it was helpful when we needed to look at it again.» (To large extent)

11. To which extent have the compulsory guest lecturers contributed to your learning?*

30 svarande

To very small extent»0 0%
To small extent»7 23%
To some extent»16 53%
To large extent»7 23%
To very large extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Try to make them more about the course and maybe less about the company..» (To small extent)
- Did not contribute that much but they were very interesting» (To small extent)

12. How well did the course administration work?*

30 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»2 6%
Ok»9 30%
Good»15 50%
Very good»4 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

- Please put folders on the homepage, for seminars and the articles, for lectures etc.» (Poor)
- Information was given too late that should have been on the course homepage directly. much faster communication!!» (Poor)
- Sometimes the information was handed out too late» (Ok)
- The results for the seminars took some time to get in the end...» (Good)
- Except when Lars forget to show the results to students. =) But we should have told you before.» (Very good)

13. How was the opportunity to get help and to ask questions to course responsible (Lars)?*

30 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»1 3%
Ok»6 20%
Good»17 56%
Very good»6 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.93

- the help was good and enough» (Good)

14. How did you perceived the reception from the course responsible?*

30 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
Ok»9 30%
Good»15 50%
Very good»6 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- Don"t understand the question» (Ok)

15. How was the working climate between you and the other students?*

30 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»5 16%
Good»10 33%
Very good»15 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

- I liked that you could choose your groups by your self. » (OK)

16. How was the work load in this course?*

30 svarande

Very low»0 0%
Low»1 3%
OK»23 76%
High»6 20%
Very high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

- The reason because it is OK is because the exam is not mandatory otherwise the workload would be higher.» (OK)
- workload was good» (OK)
- I just say high because of the literature seminars and the case assaignement seminars. But this work load was very adequate in my opinion.» (High)

17. How was the total work load this quarter?*

30 svarande

Very low»0 0%
Low»1 3%
OK»17 56%
High»10 33%
Very high»2 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.43

- Read "teknikhistoria" which took up a sincere amount of my time » (High)
- much to do but not too much» (High)

18. What grade would you give the course as a whole?*

30 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»4 13%
Good»19 63%
Very good»7 23%

Genomsnitt: 4.1

- I would like, if possible, to have more practical seminar such as the one we had about the flow making.» (Good)
- interesting course but information must be better communicated» (Good)

19. Was it good to use seminars as a learning method and as a part of the examination?*

30 svarande

To very small extent»0 0%
To small extent»0 0%
To some extent»3 10%
To large extent»10 33%
To very large extent»17 56%

Genomsnitt: 4.46

- Really good examination form» (To large extent)
- By writing and reflecting by yourself first and then discuss it with others have been really helpful!» (To very large extent)

20. Would you recommend the course in its present from to other students? If not please motivate.*

30 svarande

Absolutely not»0 0%
Probably not»0 0%
Maybe»6 20%
Probably»13 43%
Absolutely»11 36%

Genomsnitt: 4.16

- A course that is very easy to link to the reality and makes it easy to understand how it works in the real world» (Absolutely)

21. Is this course appropriate in your master program?*

30 svarande

To very small extent»0 0%
To small extent»0 0%
To some extent»4 13%
To large extent»20 66%
To very large extent»6 20%

Genomsnitt: 4.06

22. I am studying the master program in:*

30 svarande

Production Engineering»1 3%
Supply Chain Management»29 96%
Quality and Operation Management»0 0%
Management and Economics of Innovation»0 0%
Other»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.96

23. Lectures: What was good, what needs improvements and what would you suggest?

- I think that the lectures were really good, of course the guest lectures are a bit "standing on their own" but they made sense and fitted the course.»
- The seminars were really good for individual learning. The assignment groups should be smaller and the videos should be shorter. »
- they could go with a little faster! also lars wanted a lot of disussion, which didnt seem to happen... sadly...though made them somethime feel quite forces and slow!»

24. Literature seminars: What was good, what needs improvements and what would you suggest?

- It was not needed to look for information on other resources when it was possible to have possibility to hear experience of other students, so do from teachers!»
- It was good to focus a lot on the questions that we did ourselves, more than on the seminar questions. Everyone has already answered this questions and approx in the same way I think. Starting with the "four" first questions to remind the subject is very good. Focus on the other questions as well.»
- I like the seminars a lot and the only thing that should be improved is that in some way make the students participate more. »
- Always good with seminars. Lars you could guide the students a little more into good discussion instead of taking over. »
- The lectures about material flow management (OPC) could be more integrated with the course content. I think they should be part of the course, but in another different way.»
- The articles were interesting and the questions relevant. No improvements needed here»
- very good tool! most things i remeber i learned here! »

25. Group assignments: What was good, what needs improvements and what would you suggest?

- For me as a international student it was hard to be in for 100% because of video language, i didnt feel to much confidence about it!»
- It was difficult in the second report not to make overlapping with the first one. It"s usually things we have already written.»
- It was a little bit hard to do the MFM just based on the movies. Schenker (Landvetter)»
- I don"t know if it is possible to make it better, a really big thank you to Lars who did a tremendous work making these movies.»
- A little clearer with what literature can be of help.»
- It would be good to have subtitles to the films, due to the fact that it was impossible to hear what was sad when there was noise in the background (like from a forklift ect.)and to make all students understand. »
- add English subtitles for VDO in case assignment»
- They were very good for learning, but at some point we felt that both assignements were almost identical to each other.»
- Group assignments should be made in smaller teams. The videos should be recorded in swedish. »
- good, also liked the group discussions concerning these! though they were a bit un organized since wasnt sure first if you wanted a value stream mapping or material mapping...since the slide said diffrent things! »

26. What should be changed concerning the course?

- During the case presentation lectures, when the solutions were presented it was difficult to fully understand and present what we thinked about the companies and the flows to the other members, since they did not have enough insight about each case. Probably, it would be good if a seminar guidelines were uploaded bofore the session explaning what each flow is about and to present the products and companies to all the students. Or, each group should present their solutions to the class (2 seminar lectures) and then discuss flow improvements and solutions all together in each session.»
- See comment 25»
- the book! not very good»

27. Comments and other remarks

- Good lay-out with not a compulsory exam.»
- This course was really good and important. In order just to be even better, a course visit to a plant could be arranged. I know that is really difficult, but it would improve much the learning by watching it live.»

* obligatoriska frågor

Kursutvärderingssystem från