Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Nanotechnology for sustainable energy, TIF165

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-03-09 - 2012-03-25
Antal svar: 14
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Bengt-Erik Mellander»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

14 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»7 50%
Around 20 hours/week»3 21%
Around 25 hours/week»3 21%
Around 30 hours/week»1 7%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.85

- This is a mean value, since some weeks were less or more occupied» (Around 30 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

14 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 7%
75%»7 50%
100%»6 42%

Genomsnitt: 4.35

- I had clashing schedules.» (75%)
- I missed two due to sickness, otherwise I"d gone to them all. Very good lectures!» (75%)
- Exeptional lectures! » (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

14 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 7%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 28%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»9 64%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- More guidance towards grades of the projects» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

13 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 7%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»12 92%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.92

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

14 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 14%
Yes, definitely»11 78%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.92

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 14%
Large extent»7 50%
Great extent»5 35%

Genomsnitt: 3.21

- I have very much enjoyed the lectures» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»1 7%
Some extent»4 28%
Large extent»6 42%
Great extent»3 21%

Genomsnitt: 2.78

- The slides to prepare for the quiz and for the project» (Large extent)
- I always learn best when I can read things in my own tempo, so the lectures were good but sometimes it was a little too fast for me. This, however, does NOT mean that the lectures should have a lower tempo. I think the tempo in the lectures were very good, it discussed most things on equal amount of time, so if there was something that was unclear you could read about it later. Or just ask a question, it was a very question-friendly environment.» (Great extent)
- I also borrowed books but the fact remains...» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

14 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»4 28%
Rather well»9 64%
Very well»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.78

- Complicated system with lectrure material on discs.» (Rather badly)
- It would be good with a better way to distribute the lecture-notes. If it is possible to solve, the best way would be to post them on the homepage. » (Rather badly)
- The web page not at all. For the handouts - might it be possible to send the pdf:s by email?» (Rather badly)
- A little unorthodox choice of material distribution, but it worked very well.» (Rather well)
- To much time was taken from the lectures to talk about the course administration. Once or twice would have sufficed, or shorter comments.» (Rather well)
- it would be nicer if the handouts were on the homepage» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

14 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»3 21%
Very good»9 64%
I did not seek help»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.92

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

14 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»3 21%
Very well»11 78%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.78

- The examination feedback was very useful and project work was an experience» (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

14 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»3 21%
Adequate»10 71%
High»1 7%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

- The load was not high, maybe on the low side, but at the same time I really felt like I was tested on all the involved areas.» (Adequate)
- Workload depended on student expectations to gain knowledge so it could just as well be high.» (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

14 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 14%
Adequate»6 42%
High»5 35%
Too high»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

- Good that the quizes evened out the load. I personally had many project which shifts the work load towards the end, so it was all in all ok, but not so spread out. So a plus for the quizes due to this.» (Adequate)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

14 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 7%
Good»5 35%
Excellent»8 57%

Genomsnitt: 4.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Fun and applicable.» (Good)
- Very interesting course. I"d recommend it to everyone» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- the project»
- The format of the course is definitely a keeper.»
- project presentation»
- The project. It lets you dive in on a subject you"re interested in. Of course you could do it without having to, but honestly, who would?»
- Quizes, projects»
- quizes»
- Everything»
- The lectures of the second part of the course were really interesting, especially the one about nuclear power. Some student presentations helped to learn about topic not developped in the course (aerogels, some fabrication methods, ...) Preparing my presentation and report made me learn quite a lot about my topic.»
- the guest lectures and different subjects were great!»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Maybe use a dropbox folder instead of CDs or a usb at least. All lecture notes should be distrubuted in the beginning of the course, so that it is easier to pic a project and start with it earlier»
- The distribution of the lecture-notes»
- The quizzes could be a bit harder I think. I"m not sure.»
- Not a whole project day, divide into smaller groups and then you only have to attend one. This way you concentrate better and you don"t have to hear as much repetitive info.»
- Supervision for the project. More clear introduction to the project since it was not obvious what to do.»
- definitely = nothing Suggestions: literature seminars structure, maybe a more clear lecture on H storage»
- Generally speaking, too much repetition during the course: - Several lectures were about solar fuels, with not so much differences between them. Maybe after the first lecture on solar fuels the basics could be skipped to really get into the topic. - For the student presentation, there should be a maximum of 2-3 groups on the same topic. Too many people were talking about solar cells, a topic which have already been presented in the course. Maybe some topics could be proposed by the teacher to the student to make the presentation day really useful.»
- put the class material on the homepage»

16. Additional comments

- Dinko was very involved and engaged, much appreciated. »
- A huge thanks to Prof. Dinko for creating this course. I enjoyed it all the way. Probably the best course in my studies :)»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.5

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.5
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.87

Kursutvärderingssystem från