ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

GU: Model-driven Engineering, Lp 3 Vt12, DIT596

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-03-08 - 2012-03-19
Antal svar: 4
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 26%
Kontaktperson: Åsa Samdell»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

4 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 25%
Around 20 hours/week»1 25%
Around 25 hours/week»2 50%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend (including both lectures and groupwork session)?

4 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»1 25%
100%»3 75%

Genomsnitt: 4.75

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

4 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 75%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

4 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»3 75%
No, the goals are set too high»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

- The goals are misleading.» (No, the goals are set too high)

5. Did the written examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

4 svarande

No, not at all»3 75%
To some extent»1 25%
Yes, definitely»0 0%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.25

- The exam is honestly unfeasible. » (No, not at all)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the lectures been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»1 25%
Some extent»2 50%
Large extent»1 25%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

7. To what extent has groupwork been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»1 25%
Some extent»1 25%
Large extent»1 25%
Great extent»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- The groupwork was unsupervised for the most part, and without proper manuals/references, which only adds to the confusion.» (Small extent)

8. To what extent has the following learning materials been of help for your learning?

Matrisfråga

- the learning materials have quite narrow scope and don"t provide many good examples, which leads to spending too much time on trying to figure out how to use our tools. (and without being totally sure at the end)»

Lectures slides
4 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 50%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»2 50%

Genomsnitt: 3

Course Book
4 svarande

Small extent»4 100%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

Supplementary Literature
4 svarande

Small extent»1 25%
Some extent»3 75%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.75

Tools
4 svarande

Small extent»1 25%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»3 75%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

4 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»2 50%
Very well»2 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

Study climate

10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

4 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 25%
Rather good»1 25%
Very good»2 50%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- Supervision is too little and don"t have much time to ask for help, when needed. Although there is assistant professor, many times he didn"t know the answer so his presence was of no use. Supervision as it is now, is only good when it"s accompanied by proper reading materials/manuals.» (Rather poor)

11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

4 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 25%
Very well»3 75%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

12. How was the course workload?

4 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»1 25%
High»2 50%
Too high»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Wasting too much time on things that should be found on a proper manual/tutorial.» (Too high)

13. How was the total workload this study period?

4 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»1 25%
High»1 25%
Too high»2 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.25

- Due to this course and only this course.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

14. What is your general impression of the course?

4 svarande

Poor»1 25%
Fair»1 25%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»2 50%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.75 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Although the subject seems interesting, the learning approach is very very bad. Not because of the approach itself, but rather because of the way the course is structured. (poor materials, little assistance, bad tools) It"s an abuse of problem-based learning.» (Poor)

15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Supervised groupwork»
- Everything!Specially model exam papers»
- The group project is very well organized.»
- lecture notes»

16. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- - Materials, tutorials etc. - Less hours for groupwork but more constructive. - More supervision to make up for the bad tutorials - Exams should not be to create another project again. It something that takes time and should be done with a computer.»
- if possible , change the written exam pattern!»
- The exam doesn"t make any sense. We spend 6 weeks working on a project and then we"re supposed to do another project of the same complexity, on paper, in 4 hours. It would be feasible to ask for a partial M2T transformation and one or two M2M rules, but asking for the whole M2T and M2M it"s just useless. This way the exam is just testing "how fast you can write" rather than "what you do know about MDE".»
- oh, exam type- as to me it difficult to answer the questions. may be the questions are suitable for group assignment but as individual it was difficult.»

17. Additional comments

- The time given to the written exam is not enough.Its better either to change the question paper pattern or give extra time. »
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.75
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.75
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.43

Kursutvärderingssystem från