|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
V12 - Mechatronic design, SSY155Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2012-03-08 - 2013-08-20 Antal svar: 14 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 56% Kontaktperson: Marie Iwanow» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Övriga studenter
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.14 - Assignments. Assignments. Assignments.
8 Assignments in this course and 3 of equal workload in the other course.» (Around 30 hours/week) 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.42 - No excercise sessions due to collisions with other courses» (75%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.14 - None were presented in the course memo.» (I have not seen/read the goals) 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.92 - No goals presented.» (No, the goals are set too low) 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.21 - No goals presented during the course. It is worth noting that 40% of the exam (20p, two out of 5 questions) related to ONE lecture (Describing function), nothing on the exam covered the first 3 weeks ( Motor selection etc ). This seems out of proportion.» (No, not at all) Course contentThe present shape of the course covers a number of topics all relevant in mechatronic design but somewhat disconnected from each other.6. Any part which feels unnecessary?- Although the parts on trajectory planning, computer vision and fault detection feels relevant it seems that the small coverage of the topics doesnt give anything, to small time for topics that by them selves could have been complete courses. The hand in assignment in fault detection feels completely unnessecarry, and to large. Especially since it is obvious that it is taken from a Course at linköping and awarded 1.5 hec. there. To have that as a two hour lab with only two lectures on the topic as preparation seems a bit to much.»- The image part was only mention briefly in the las lecture. Since it was such a small part it could have been skipped.» - Using the matlab software for servo dimensioning felt very unnecessary. While servo dimensioning felt very relevant and the lectures were good, the software used was very bad and did not have any educational value while it also felt like the experience with this software would not help me in my future as a professional.» - No» - servo dim exercise. learning to use that software and the assignment felt like a waist of time. it did not teach me a lot.» - servodim, fault detection. at least in the way they were handled this year.» - computer vision » - 50% of the assignments. Especially the part of them involving lab things that actually doesn"t work properly. As a side note... The computers in the lab need a better processor and more RAM.» 7. Any part which should be covered more in depth?- actuators and sensors, and th design and choice of these. »- Fault detection was very interesting and certainly seemed good to learn but maybe it should be given some more time to be help full and maybe in another course even.» - Not by introducing more content to the powerpoint slides, but well structured assignments for the Path planning, trajectory and computer vision would be interesting.» - Computer vision should either be excluded or spent more time on. I don"t find it acceptable to only spend that little time on it and then let 20% of the exam cover this area.» - No» - not that I can think of» Teaching and course administration8. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.78 - Due to the many topics covered in the course the lectures seemed very disconnected from each other. » (Some extent) 9. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.92 - none, except the parts on describing functions and motor selection» (Small extent) 10. Would it be better to buy one (maybe expensive) course book than to use several free internet books?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.66 - definately, if it was used to a large extent.» (Yes) 11. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.78 - Need a file system when handing in assignments. » (Very badly) Study climate12. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.21 - The assignments were hard and we could not ask the teaching assistent since the consultation time was to close to the dead line and if we sent emails we didn"t recive any answer» (Very poor) 13. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.57 - The only way to get help on the assignments» (Very well) 14. How was the course workload?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.21 - The course content was easy. The assignments took a lot of time.» (Adequate) 15. How was the total workload this study period?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.21 Summarizing questions16. What is your general impression of the course?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.78 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - The course felt at some places unprepared and ill planed. Really bad that the course goals are not made clear in the beginning.» (Poor) 17. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Labs are good, if all information is availiable before hand.»- The assignment 1-5. » - modelling and simulation with both dymola and simulink, nonlinearities in mechatronics and control, path planning» - the quest lecturers were nice.» - motor-gearbox calculations, » - Pathplanning» - Azita was really helpful, Nicolc was ok. Guest lectures were nice.» (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand) 18. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Redo lectures to a more coherent whole, remove maybe the lectures on computer vision and trajectory planning.»- The servoDim assignment and the fault detection assignment. They where poorly written and the Matlab program was buggy. The voluntary path and trajectory assignment could have been mandatory since it was an interesting assignment.» - The lab needs to work. It was a catastrofy this year. servo dimensioning could do good from using software a little bit more probable to encounter in the industry. Over all assignments need to get worked through more and the tools used need to be more reliable.» - I believe in "learn by doing" when it comes to stuff like path planning, trajectory and computer vision. Path planning problem should be compulsory and structured in such a way, that it is not so hard to begin. For example, predefine a set of functions needed to solve the problem with required input data and output data. Trajectory planning should have a predefined code skeleton with self explanatory code and comments. Computer Vision assignment could be something about those white worms(or whatever the picture in powerpoint presentation resembles). Students could somehow try to find the centerpoints and the line which defines the orientation.» - We spent much time on motors in the course. Where was the question on that on the exam? Instead there was two about backlash? If it is assignments with deadline week after week there is good to have feedback of it. I still only got feedback, and when I call that feebback I am very kind, of three of seven assigments. How should I know if I was absolutely wrong about something? This was very bad!» - servo-dim! using a program that crashes really often, to play around and not really learning that much, is not worth it. Also, it is really bad that the fault detection was just copypasted from linköping, and it was not clear how much of it we should do. » - The assignments» - You need to design the course in way that different topics keep some relation to each other. There should be more integrity between the topics covered in the course. What is the relationship between "sensor technology" , path-planning, fault isolation, motor selection? too cluttered. » - Assignments! Less and more essential -with working equipment-. Also update the code skeleton for the fault detection. It would be nice if you could actually use it when you get it, without needing to do 100 modifications to the pre-coded skeleton first. That assignment also need some update. It was said to "skip the tasks that has to do with fault isolation" but it wasn"t said which tasks these were.» 19. Additional comments- To many hand ins. If there skuld been this many they have to be better written and explained.»- The amount of exercises wasn"t enough and the variety was dull, specially the describing functions.» - The comunication between the different responsible teachers was pretty bad. » - Azita was very helpful. The course was interesting because it covered a wide range of topics.» - Why are PM:s about the assignments handed out, if we should change some values and skip some parts (which weren"t given from start, but given when we bumped into problems)?» - 1-More integrity in lecture materials please, and 2-please check the assignments before posting them on the course homepage, they are mostly vague, with a lot of errors, lacking key details, and disorganized.» Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.78 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.44
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0%