ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

E11/12-3 Environmental measurement techniques, RRY075

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-03-08 - 2012-04-01
Antal svar: 7
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 41%
Kontaktperson: Calle Lindquist»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Read this before filling in the questionnaire

Keep in mind that everyone involved in the course will be able to read your comments. Comments and criticism are welcome, but should remain constructive.

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

7 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»5 71%
Around 25 hours/week»2 28%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.28

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

7 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 14%
50%»1 14%
75%»1 14%
100%»4 57%

Genomsnitt: 4.14

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

7 svarande

Don"t know, haven"t seen/read the course goals»1 14%
Don"t know, the goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»5 71%
No, the goals are set too high»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

4. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

7 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»5 71%
Yes, definitely»2 28%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.28

Teaching and course administration

5. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 42%
Large extent»3 42%
Great extent»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

6. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»4 57%
Some extent»3 42%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.42

7. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

7 svarande

Very poorly»3 42%
Rather poorly»4 57%
Rather well»0 0%
Very well»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.57

8. How did the lectures of Donal Murtagh work?

Frågan är kopplad till lärare: Donal Murtagh»

7 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»6 85%
Very well»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

9. How did the lectures of Johan Mellqvist work?

Frågan är kopplad till lärare: Johan Mellqvist»

7 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»4 57%
Very well»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

10. How did the lectures of Joachim Urban work?

Frågan är kopplad till lärare: Joachim Urban»

7 svarande

Very poorly»1 14%
Rather poorly»1 14%
Rather well»4 57%
Very well»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

11. How did the laboratory assignments work?

7 svarande

Very poorly»1 14%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»5 71%
Very well»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

12. How did the exercises work?

7 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»2 28%
Rather well»4 57%
Very well»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

13. Comments regarding teaching and course administration

- I liked that they had first 2 lecture and then one exercise. »
- Be more specified what needs to be done. Be more specific what we need to know for the exam, now I had no idea what the course were about until the last few weeks. »
- The course was interesting but handled verry sloppy. The slides were very much in english even though one third of the students were english speeking. The solutions to the excercises were in some cases poorly written and it is really frustrating to study for an exam and not have any good solutions to compare with. In the final exam the points granted for each question seemed pretty random. A large calculation exercise gave 5 points while a rather "easy" or "small" theory excersise gave 8 points. It is hard to eveluate which question to put more effort into. To put 10 points on LIDAR which was quickly mentioned on the last lecture is not fair. Maybe 5 or so but not 10.»
- Hard, or impossible, to get hold of answers to exercises and old exams. the course could have been much easier if answers were available. It seems like the teachers made the course more difficult then what it could have been if answers were provided. It is hard to find how to calculate stuff in the material.»

Study climate

14. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

7 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 14%
Rather good»3 42%
Very good»3 42%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

15. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

7 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 28%
Very well»5 71%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

16. How was the course workload?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»6 85%
High»1 14%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

17. How was the total workload this study period?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»5 71%
High»1 14%
Too high»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

Summarizing questions

18. What is your general impression of the course?

7 svarande

Poor»1 14%
Fair»3 42%
Adequate»1 14%
Good»2 28%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

19. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The laboratory exercises which provided a much better understanding of the principles involved.»
- Laboration, Johan, Donal and Joachim»
- Course content seems to be good and relevant. The laboratories were good and rather interesting.»

20. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Significantly better prepared course material. A large portion of the slides, which acted as the only course material were in swedish and it took quite some time before the translations were made and submitted to the student portal. There was also a huge inconsistency between the mathematical language used by the three lecturers, for instance, several common symbols were frequently used for very similiar, but not equal properties. The greek letter tau meant both transmittivity and optical thickness throughout the course and sigma indicated both path difference and absorpion cross-section (as well as the Stefan-Bolzmann constant). »
- We need more solved problems with full solutions, just putting up questions and no answers on the course website does not help at all when studying at home.»
- One booklet with all the lecture and that the slides are in english, not that some of them in Swedish. And even if there are Swedish slides, change them before putting them on the homepage.»
- You need to make this to one course and not three. The best would be a course compendium containing everything that is necessary during the course.»
- Put more effort into the administrative stuff, show the students that you actually care about the course. The solutions for our exam is a joke, you might as well not even put out a solution if you are going to refer to the lectures anyway. »
- Teachers provide answers to exercises and ols exams. Better administration of course home page, not all material, especially the exercises, were uploaded quick enough. Faster correcting of lab reports and exam. »

21. Additional comments

- All in all, a great and very interesting course.»
- Interesting course but poorly handled.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från