ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

GU: Advanced Software Architecture, Lp 3 Vt12, DIT542

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-03-07 - 2012-03-19
Antal svar: 7
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 31%
Kontaktperson: Åsa Samdell»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

7 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 14%
Around 20 hours/week»0 0%
Around 25 hours/week»3 42%
Around 30 hours/week»1 14%
At least 35 hours/week»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

7 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 14%
75%»3 42%
100%»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 4.28

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

7 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 14%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»6 85%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

7 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»6 85%
No, the goals are set too high»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.14

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

7 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 57%
Yes, definitely»2 28%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»1 14%
Some extent»1 14%
Large extent»5 71%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»6 85%
Great extent»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

7 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»3 42%
Rather well»3 42%
Very well»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

7 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»4 57%
Very good»2 28%
I did not seek help»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

7 svarande

Very poorly»1 14%
Rather poorly»1 14%
Rather well»2 28%
Very well»3 42%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

11. How was the course workload?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 57%
High»1 14%
Too high»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

12. How was the total workload this study period?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»2 28%
High»3 42%
Too high»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 4

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

7 svarande

Poor»1 14%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 28%
Good»3 42%
Excellent»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.42 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The chance to evaluate another group»
- Model exam papers!»
- The project could be interesting, if explained in the proper way.»
- continue»
- The theory is well explained and interesting»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- 1) assignments should finish a good deal before the exam. Too little time to prepare. 2) More systems to choose from so we can be exposed to various architectures.»
- lab teacher»
- Nothing!»
- The lectures have the potential to be interesting, but then the whole lecture is just a list of definitions. There is no need to bomb people with definitions, we"ve got books. What we want from the professor is rather to raise an interest for the subject. If we are nearly one hundred at the first lecture and less then twenty at the last, it cannot be just students fault. The project. We learn in the first five minutes of the first lecture that the architect is one, a one man show, and then we"re doing a project in groups of eight... This is how it currently works: one person does the job, a second person follows, there may be a third person who tries to be interested but three people at the same screen are just too many so he/she gives up after some time, the rest of people are bored to death. So this is my suggestion, no more than three people per group. Reduce the complexity of the projects (otherwise it would be unfeasible for you to correct all of them) but at least you include all of the students in the project work. Currently, at least half of the students don"t get anything from this activity, just waste their time.»
- nothing»
- Skip the lectures about some particular projects and add practical problems to resolve with the teacher in class»

16. Additional comments

- OSATE is a good but buggy tool. It would be good to tell us some things about those bugs before we start using the tool. A more complete manual would be welcome, too. »
- !»
- We should solve more practical problems in class.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.42
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.42
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.6

Kursutvärderingssystem från