Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

GU: Computer Security, Lp 3 Vt12, DIT641

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-03-08 - 2012-03-19
Antal svar: 7
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 30%
Kontaktperson: Åsa Samdell»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

7 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»3 42%
Around 20 hours/week»2 28%
Around 25 hours/week»1 14%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.14

- Many of the topics were covered in other courses e.g. Network Security and Operating Systems» (At most 15 hours/week)
- The course didn"t take much time.» (At most 15 hours/week)
- Most of it for personal interests and not for the course was to heavy » (At least 35 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

7 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 14%
50%»1 14%
75%»2 28%
100%»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Like studying at home» (25%)
- Lectures were good and helpfull.» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

7 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 14%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 42%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

- The syllabus was very short and didn"t give much information except grades and a very general course overview.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

6 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 16%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»5 83%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.83

- The goals are not very clear but have an appropriate level.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

6 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 66%
Yes, definitely»2 33%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

- It"s such a broad subject that it"s impossible to assess everything.» (To some extent)
- Good exam!» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. Please give feedback on the book (Stallings)

4 svarande

I didn"t read it»1 25%
I preferred (...) instead»1 25%
I didn"t like it»2 50%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

- Liked the book» (?)
- It was okey.» (?)
- I liked it.» (?)
- Why is there no "I liked it"? I liked it. » (I preferred (...) instead)
- Too fat book, lots of useless content, memorizing figures for the exam sucks.» (I didn"t like it)
- Many difficult words, both in the book and on the slides. This was more significant than in other courses.» (I didn"t like it)

7. Please give feedback on the other course material, i.e. offprints (OP), downloads (DL) and hand-outs the web:

7 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 14%
Adequate»2 28%
Good»4 57%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

- Upload all lecture slides in full-page format to make them more readable on an iPad.» (Adequate)
- They were a good complement to the lectures and notes.» (Good)
- Somewhat messy with all the OP, DL and links. Hard to keep track of it all.» (Good)

8. What do you think about the guest lecture?

Hard Disk Data Recovery and Erasure

5 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 20%
Good»0 0%
Excellent»4 80%

Genomsnitt: 4.6

- Didn"t attend.» (?)
- missed it» (Adequate)
- Very interesting, and the lecturer really knew what he was talking about.» (Excellent)

9. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 42%
Large extent»2 28%
Great extent»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

- Liked some of the more practical lessons. » (Some extent)
- Magnus wrote too much important things on the blackboard. I told him once to write larger which he did the rest of the lecture but the next time he wrote very small when the current board ran out of space.» (Great extent)

10. What was the best about the lecture part of the course? What can be improved?

- The lectueres were good overall. Sometimes the teachers wrote exactly the same thing on the blackboard as the slides contianed, somewhat time consuming. Also some some parts that were written on the blackboard could be contained in the slides.»
- Could be faster»
- Liked the lessons Magnus Almgren held the most. »
- Erland Jonsson taught really good. The best Swedish English-speaker of that age (sorry) I have heard.»
- The best part was that it was interesting topics. Thou, I would really liked the ethics part to be bigger. Already on the first lecture, Erland told that on of the topic would be ethics conserning computer security. And I thought that sounded really interesting, so I looked forward to that. In the end it was about 3 min long. And no discussion. So I want it to be longer, and with some sort of possibility to discus. Magnus had some problems with student unable to read what he wrote on the board. He tried to write bigger, but I think je just needed to write clearer. So that"s a tip from me!»

11. How was the Identification and Authentification lab?

7 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 28%
Good»5 71%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

- This were the best and most fun lab. Could have been a bit larger.» (Good)
- Always fun with programming labs.» (Good)

12. How was the GPG lab?

7 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 28%
Adequate»2 28%
Good»3 42%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

- Some groups had problem signing others keys making wich were time consuming. The signing part could be done in some other way. Else the content of the lab were not sufficient.» (Fair)
- Had problems with our chalmers mail accounts wich stalled us a whole lab time. » (Fair)
- Annoying problem with everyone that was late wanted us to sign this and that. Created alot of extra work for us. » (Adequate)
- Too many "easy" misstakes could be made which made it a bit tedious.» (Adequate)
- Fast and made us realise that GPG is rather easy.» (Good)

13. How was the vulnerability scanning lab?

7 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 28%
Good»4 57%
Excellent»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

- A little strange but the conclusions were good.» (Adequate)
- My favorit lab. Would be nice to learn how you do to set upp the scanning server allso.» (Excellent)

14. What was the best about the lab part of the course? What can be improved?

- The first lab was the most interesting. The other to were to easy. Maybe it would be possible to have some lab containing CC, risk analasys or some security and dependability model.»
- Missing that sql injection lab... ,) »
- Liked how practical the labs was. Somthing you can use in real life.»
- the experimentation part»
- The SQL injection lab will be a good complement.»
- I would like more programming, but I guess it might be hard to do.»

15. How was the balance between the lecture and the lab parts?

- Good.»
- Good ballance»
- Good.»
- Good.»
- nothing to complain about»

16. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

7 svarande

Very badly»1 14%
Rather badly»1 14%
Rather well»2 28%
Very well»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 3

- The course homepage was hosted at a different university. The lab report page wasn"t updated in time for my group, please send emails to at least one group member when the lab is corrected, no matter if it"s positive or negative.» (Very badly)
- Much material went onto the black boards, when someone asked the teacher if the material would be uploaded, the teacher told him that he should hask one of the students who took pictures of the boards...» (Rather badly)
- One of the best structured courses I have taken. » (Very well)

Study climate

17. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

7 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 14%
Very good»5 71%
I did not seek help»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 4

18. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

7 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 14%
Rather well»2 28%
Very well»4 57%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

- My friends ditched me for some reason. So I didn"t have anyone to study with.» (Rather poorly)
- Would be nice if there was a google group or forum where you could ask questions and disscus the lessons » (Rather well)
- Some exeption in the GPGlab» (Very well)

19. How was the course workload?

7 svarande

Too low»1 14%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»5 71%
High»1 14%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

20. How was the total workload this study period?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 14%
Adequate»1 14%
High»4 57%
Too high»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

- Programming languages was hell» (High)
- My own fault for accepting to much to do this period.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

21. What is your general impression of the course?

7 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 28%
Good»2 28%
Excellent»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 4.14 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- To similar Network Security and Operating System courses.» (Adequate)

22. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The structure and administration. First lab.»
- I liked the organization security part but I didn"t learn it good enoght. But this is a core security issue that should be kept. More moral? »
- The openVAS lab»
- Guest lecture»

23. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Nothing comes to mind.»
- Would like to have web lab vurnurabilities lab.»
- no lengthy reports... and no stupid figures on the exam. memorizing the book isn"t knowing the subject.»
- Extend the topic on ethics»

24. Additional comments

- Great course»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.14

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.14
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.78

Kursutvärderingssystem från