ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

GU: Programming Paradigms, Lp 3 Vt12, DIT331

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-03-08 - 2012-03-19
Antal svar: 4
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 25%
Kontaktperson: Åsa Samdell»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

4 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»3 75%
Around 20 hours/week»1 25%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.25

- Other courses at excercises time.» (At most 15 hours/week)
- Didn"t spend much time on this course, as there were no mandatory moments to participate in and I was lazy.» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

4 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 25%
50%»0 0%
75%»2 50%
100%»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

4 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 25%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 50%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

3 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»3 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

3 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 33%
Yes, definitely»1 33%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 3

- I think the exam was too easy and it didn"t include any of the hard parts like explicit continuations, explicit thunks and concurrent processes.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»1 25%
Some extent»2 50%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»1 25%
Some extent»2 50%
Large extent»1 25%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- No course literature except for the website with lecture notes.» (Small extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

4 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 50%
Rather well»1 25%
Very well»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- There are no true slides and no book. Also, no solutions for the exercises. If you can not attend to the exercises (they are in the same day!) you can not do anything.» (Rather badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

4 svarande

Very poor»1 25%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 25%
Very good»0 0%
I did not seek help»2 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

4 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 50%
Very well»1 25%
I did not seek cooperation»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

11. How was the course workload?

4 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 25%
Adequate»3 75%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

12. How was the total workload this study period?

4 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 25%
Adequate»3 75%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

4 svarande

Poor»1 25%
Fair»1 25%
Adequate»1 25%
Good»1 25%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Sometimes basic introduction to concepts, like Duff"s Device was left out of lectures. Generally motivations on WHY to learn stuff, like explicit continuations (and why they are good), was left out. Instead JP jumped right into the technical details. Giving short motivations on stuff takes little time and probably helps understanding WHY we learn it. :)» (Adequate)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The course title»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Slides, exercises with solutions and maybe a book (instead of slides).»
- Not focusing so much on transformations between paradigms, but more on where certain paradigms are wonderful.»
- Introduce some labs, i find it that more deadlines (like labs) greatly increases the learning experience.»
- Practically everything else»

16. Additional comments

- A bit too much focus on translating between paradigms and almost nothing on benefits/drawbacks of different paradigms which I think would have been interesting. Terrible course material, no structure, bad examples and frequent errors. Equally bad lectures for about the same reason.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.5
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.5
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.37

Kursutvärderingssystem från