Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPTSE VT-12 Environmental policy instruments, UNA 016

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-03-05 - 2012-03-25
Antal svar: 21
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 53%
Kontaktperson: Rickard Ambring»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

21 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»4 19%
Around 20 hours/week»12 57%
Around 25 hours/week»4 19%
Around 30 hours/week»1 4%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.09

- Lectures + Reading of the book + Case study » (At most 15 hours/week)
- Should have used more, the book was interested but I did not have enough time to read it properly. The other course that I was having absorbed all of my available time.» (Around 20 hours/week)
- I spent a lot of time with reading, or for searching further information online.» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

21 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»9 42%
100%»12 57%

Genomsnitt: 4.57

- I went traveling. » (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

21 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 9%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 9%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»17 80%

Genomsnitt: 3.61

- The learning in this course goes beyond the goals... i didn´,t even payed attention to them since the professors inspired so much confidence that i just trusted that, whatever they wanted to teach about, would be very useful and interesting.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

19 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»2 10%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»17 89%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.89

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

20 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 20%
Yes, definitely»16 80%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- I think there is a gap between whats covered in the lectures and whats examined, I think the exam could be a bit "harder" (now I don"t know if I passed but anyway...)» (To some extent)
- I would prefer more "smaller"questions, each of the question contains less points. » (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

21 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 9%
Large extent»10 47%
Great extent»9 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- The lectures were really really good.» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

21 svarande

Small extent»2 9%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»11 52%
Great extent»8 38%

Genomsnitt: 3.19

- Book = perfect !!» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

21 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»9 42%
Very well»12 57%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

9. What is your opinion about the performance of Thomas Sterner as lecturer?

21 svarande

Very good»17 80%
Good»3 14%
Moderat»1 4%
Poor»0 0%
Very poor»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.23

- Thomas is one of the best lecturers I have had. Ever.» (Very good)
- Very nice and charismatic chap! It indeed is a pleasure to come to his lectures, irregardless of subject.» (Very good)
- His way of teaching, telling stories, explaining economic mechanism but also showing the source of problems are defintily something special. A Person who is worth listening whenever he starts speaking.» (Very good)
- One remark: sometimes the slides are not very clear. » (Very good)
- Thomas sterners lectures were amazing» (Very good)

10. What is your opinion about the performance of Jessica Coria as lecturer?

21 svarande

Very good»11 52%
Good»7 33%
Moderat»2 9%
Poor»1 4%
Very poor»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.66

- Super !!!!» (Very good)
- Very friendly and funny teaching behaviour, but not that good in explaining things as thomas. » (Good)

11. What is your opinion about the performance of Magnus Hennlock as lecturer?

16 svarande

Very good»5 31%
Good»7 43%
Moderat»2 12%
Poor»2 12%
Very poor»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.06

- I did not attend» (?)
- didn"t attented. » (?)

12. What is your opinion about the performance of Astrid Dannenberg as lecturer?

18 svarande

Very good»4 22%
Good»10 55%
Moderat»3 16%
Poor»1 5%
Very poor»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.05

- Did not attend the lecture» (?)
- I had problems understanding the purpose with the game theory lecture, but Astrid as a lecturer was good.» (Good)

13. What is your opinion about the performance of Xiangping Liu as lecturer?

21 svarande

Very good»2 9%
Good»2 9%
Moderat»12 57%
Poor»4 19%
Very poor»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Interesting, but please keep an eye on the time. It"s hard to stay sharp for hours.» (Moderat)
- The way she talks make you fall asleep, not easy to listen for longer time.» (Moderat)
- Too many/heavy slides and too long lectures (misses the breaks).» (Moderat)

Study climate

14. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

21 svarande

Very poor»2 9%
Rather poor»1 4%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»14 66%
I did not seek help»4 19%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

15. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

21 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»7 33%
Very well»14 66%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- One person is my group did not work at all and made us loosing time.» (Rather well)
- The work in the case study was not equally distributed in our group (talking about free riders...).» (Rather well)
- I guess I was lucky with my case study group.» (Very well)

16. How was the course workload?

21 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»3 14%
Adequate»18 85%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

- More lectures could have been great.» (Adequate)

17. How was the total workload this study period?

21 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 4%
Adequate»16 76%
High»4 19%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

Summarizing questions

18. What is your general impression of the course?

21 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 4%
Good»11 52%
Excellent»9 42%

Genomsnitt: 4.38 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- I would have liked the course to be twice as long because it was so enjoyable. » (Excellent)
- The only detail is that i will like some lectures on empirical cases in which we have to construct the cost functions (get the parameters) according to a companies data... i mean i understood how to use them.... but where will i get them from in real life? » (Excellent)

19. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The guest lecturers. Especially the one from traffic planning. It was interesting to see policy instruments in a context that affects me!»
- The case study.»
- Thomas lectures, the book.»
- The exercises (review)and case study»
- The broad envelope of topics covered. Very helpful to understand economic impacts with different sources that influence policy. Makes you understanding the dynamics of global developement and economics»
- case study! best group project I"ve ever experienced.»
- Case study. »
- Case Study and the example exercises.»
- everything.»
- the study case and solving the exercices in class»
- Study excersise»
- everything»
- Case Studys, Exercises (maybe even some more)»

20. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Maybe some "theory" in the case study. I. e. more questions and analyzing, and maybe the students could get feedback on that before the exam. I think that would have helped. And maybe have the exercise earlier, because it was after the exercise my pieces fell into place and I could understand the lectures and graphs better.»
- almost nothing, maybe some more lectures with thomas.»
- more real world examples»
- game theory to explain some of the lobbying issues seems to be quite an insufficient framework to explain phenomenas as climate change negotiation accurately.... but perhaps is just my lack of experience... i would like us to be more critical on this subject and delimit the power of this science to what it is in this context... group psychology. Cut text on Xiangping lecture slides... make it more concrete.... say the main things you want to say and then just give simple and clear examples so we can keep the most important real deep.... you showed a lot of math.. and lot of facts.. which is of course interesting.... but is not easy to uptake. »
- Two whole lectures about playing games, it is very interesting and it have me ā lot, but maybe one lecture is enough»
- Have the hand ing and presentation of the project one week earlier.»
- Lecture on policies for agriculture should be more about the actual policies than about general information about biodiversity»

21. Additional comments

- Thank you Thomas and Jessica for a great course!»
- thank you for this course»
- congratulations to the professors... i am very pleased with this course ... it was an eye opener ! now i want to study economy =) . thank you »
- One of the best courses!!! :)»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.38

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.38
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.84

Kursutvärderingssystem från