|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
MPDSD Design Systems 2012, ARK176Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2012-03-04 - 2012-07-01 Antal svar: 19 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 76% Kontaktperson: Jaan-Henrik Kain» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Arkitektur 300 hp Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Arkitektur 300 hp
Goals and fullfilment of goalsThe learning outcomes are given in the course programme. This is the knowledge, understanding, skills and perspectives you are expected to reach. Fill in for each outcome how well they have been fulfilled in your opinion.1. Learning outcome 1*After completion of this course, the student should be able to: Have a basic understanding of how to use different approaches to systems thinking in design, architecture or planning tasks19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.15 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - There is a lack in how to use the system thinking in design tasks, such as an architectural assignment.» (Insufficient) 2. Learning outcome 2*After completion of this course, the student should be able to: Structure knowledge through systems thinking by using selected approaches in system diagrams and illustrations (Assignment 1).19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.1 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 3. Learning outcome 3*After completion of this course, the student should be able to: Tentatively analyze and synthesize complex knowledge by employing systems thinking in design work, i.e., by combining and integrating different systems approaches (Assignments 2 and 3).19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.94 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - för komplex uppgift och för lite ledning gjorde att gruppen famlade i mörker och var oklara i vad som skulle lämnas in. mycket energi gick åt att förstå vad som förväntades av oss. den tiden borde gått till att utforska olika system.» (Insufficient) 4. Learning outcome 4*After completion of this course, the student should be able to: Qualify such analysis and synthesis by developing design criteria (Assignment 3).19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.84 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - I don´,t see the difference bbetween creating design criterias based on systems and on, say, SWOT-analysis.» (Insufficient) 5. Learning outcome 5*After completion of this course, the student should be able to: Translate the analysis, synthesis and design criteria into draft design proposals, using systems thinking as language of communication and justification (Assignment 3).19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.68 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - I do see benefits with using system to argue choises made but as I said, I have a hard time seeing how the design is affected by system thinking. » (Insufficient) 6. Learning outcome 6*After completion of this course, the student should be able to: Reflect critically on the usefulness and relevance of systems thinking for design, architecture and planning (Assignment 4).19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.21 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 7. Are these objectives reasonable in relation to your pre-knowledge?*19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2 - Maybe the terminology makes the subject to appear as more complicated than it is, i think a more natural connection to everyday experiences could help,realize its all about what you know/think , not what you dont know.» (Yes, the goals are reasonable) 8. Are the goals reasonable in relation to the scope and amount of credits?*19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.11 - men det hade behövts mer ledning och kontinuitet i kursen. tex var det inte bra med ett lärar byte mitt i kursen.» (Yes, the goals are reasonable) LecturesTo what extent did the lectures/workshops contribute to the learning outcomes and as support for solving the assignments?9. Lecture: Basic terminology, elements and types of systems - Jaan-Henrik Kain*19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.88 - Some lectures was brilliant and inspiring, others not in sync with the assignment.» (To some extent) 10. Giga mapping - Birger Sevaldson*19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.94 11. System Dynamics - Patrik Wallman*19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 - good with examples, easier to understand and visualize. More difficult to apply on your own systems.» (To some extent) 12. Integrating a Greenhouse in an Urban context - Lina Ahlström*19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.47 - I hardly remember this lecture. » (To some extent) 13. A Systems approach to participatory design processes - Shawn Westcott*19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.58 - This was a poorly prepared lecture and the guy had no sense of time management. Not a day that I learned anything.» (Not at all) 14. Rivercity Gothenburg: Working with Complex Systems - Olga Tarrasó*19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.2 - It was very hard to understand her, the language.» (Not at all) 15. Wicked problems and their leverage points - Aleksi Neuvonen*19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.05 - Inspiring. I found the gatekeeper concept interesting, finding persons that have great impact on peoples choices. Positions of power not always considered. Easy to understand, tricky to do on your own. Since he had time after the lecture, it would have been nice to get some help, finding our gatekeepers. And to have been a bit more prepared beforehand, at a stage in our projects that would have better supported the search for gatekeepers.» (Quite well) 16. Growing knowledge: a systems approach to a design strategy - Joel Berge*19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.92 - Great to hear and see examples from other students!» (Excellently) 17. Biomimicry: Natural Systems approach - Anna Maria Orru*19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.31 - This lecture day grew on me. It was a bit off topic to start with, but took off and turned out to be more relevant over time. However this lady needs to learn some time management as well. DO NOT force students to work during lunch time!!» (Quite well) 18. SWOT analysis and discussion on the use of systems in design processes*19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.61 - ingen introduktion eller uppföljning till hur man använder en SWOT. » (Not at all) Education and course administration19. What support did you get for your learning from course literature and other material?*19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.7 - Some more than others, Dancing whit systems and the other text by the same author were my favorites. Easy read, easy to understand, almost poetical. » (Rather big) 20. To what extent did the literature seminar contribute to the learning outcomes and as support for solving the assignments?*19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.5 - Cant see the connection» (Not at all) 21. To what extent did the desk crits contribute to the learning outcomes and as support for solving the assignments?*19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.68 - Things were explaind in different ways from different teachers...and critics was given in opposite direction to the same problem. Very confusing. You got to discuss internal before telling you opinion to the student! And I personaly think that Kain have to step forward in the discussion... he"s often talkt over by the others...» (Not at all) 22. How did the organisation, memoranda, direct information etc. function?*19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.18 - Extremly bad planning and organization... the assignments was catastrophy! We"ve just been doing systems random. And no information about what we were heading for was given» (Very bad) 23. To what extent did Assignment 1 contribute to the learning outcomes?*19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.05 - vi blev mycket förvirrade av kritiken på ass 1 och började om. det var bra för oss.» (Quite well) 24. To what extent did Assignment 2 contribute to the learning outcomes?*19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.88 25. To what extent did Assignment 3 contribute to the learning outcomes?*19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.64 - In my opinion It was a too big project, it should have been divided in to parts and not all "come togeather as one big project" It became messy and confusing for everyone.» (Not at all) 26. To what extent did Assignment 4 (individual reflection) contribute to the learning outcomes?19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.72 - It is always good to step back and reflect on what you have been doing. Much appreciated that in this course it was actually planed for and given some time in the schedule.» (Quite well) Work environment27. How do you rate the possibilities to get assistance and ask questions?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.22 - igen, INTE bra att byta lärare mitt i.» (?) 28. How has the cooperation between the students in your group been?*19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.36 - It would have been much, much better to change groups betwewn each assignment to spread the knowledge and loosen the stress of the groups that were not working well.» (Very bad) Concluding questions29. What is your general impression of the course?*19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.57 - It sometimes, during the process, felt like it was easy to get lost in the complexity: "what"s the goal with this?" Perhaps this is natural because it"s an exploratory course. But some more clarity would have made it easier to work and to understand the connection between the assignments.
I think the different lectures have been very interesting and nicely diverse.» (Good) 30. What should be preserved next year?- The Prezi presentation, really good tool, maybe even go deeper into it(or similar).»- föreläsningarna» - Several tasks» - The critical discussions. Why not have a discussion after writing the reflection when everyone had time to think?» - The lesson of Lina Ahlström, Biomimmicry and the Scott lesson.» - For the most part I would not change a great deal.» - the application areas should be alitle diverse the building was too restricting» - Content» - The reflection paper task and the good literature seminar. The text about leverage points was very good to read! » - all the areas are quite relevant» - I think the order and scope of tasks is good, with the four main assignments. » - Assigment 1, 2 and 3» - Many good lectures and films.» 31. What should be changed next year?- Introduce project/site later in the course. Use swot in the beginning to describe something connected to personal experience first. (E.g. Two days of using some different mappings,describing interest/hobbie, then a short presentation). I think this can render some "aha"-sensations, clearifying the whole mapping-idea. When a degree of understanding has been reached, one can better understand what to with systems thinking. Now I feel it got a bit confused regarding the courses intentions. I feel it would be better to get the site later on, since one naturally starts material thinking when given material.»- inte så stor uppgift. bättre om man gör fler system än stora. visa ännu mer konkreta exempel på resultat som kommit från system tänk. » - More individual work and several small assignments how to link systems with design.» - Change groups after every assignment, make the assignment free standing, more lectures by Jaan-Henrik since it was informative and very interesting. I think It would have been easier than mixing with so many different lecturers.» - The planning of the course...give clear instructions for tasks. And give breaks during lectures! I cant be focused for more than 1,5 hours» - More time for the individual project. Maybe sacrifice a few lectures which have no close relevance to the project at hand to allow for more time to deliver a well rounded report.» - Teh bio mimicy course was awesome» - Seminars» - Make sure that the lecturers that come knows what preknowledge the students have. And make sure they are prepared for the lectures so that their messages comes out clear and not blurred in the middle of too much talking about irrelevant things. And make them realize that they have about a day or half a day for their lecture and workshop with us. Many of them gave the impression of trying to squeeze in a weeks work into one day. » - More teaching about how applying systems in reality (not only in design)» - Layout of the course. Do not start with gigamapping! Some lectures better in sync whit what we was doing at the moment.» 32. Other comments...- Try to make more interaction between teachers and students at the moment of consultion time.»- no» - Quite a relavant course for planners and designers, its importance should be emphasised» - Note to myself: It"s quite difficult to fill in this kind of form very late. » Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.66 * obligatoriska frågor
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0%