Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
LP3_11/12_Leadership and communication, BOM030
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2012-03-13 - 2012-03-25 Antal svar: 22 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 40% Kontaktperson: Christina Larsson»
1. One question about the course in general*Estimate to what extent, on a scale from 1- 5 , you share the opinion of these statements, where 1 means that you do NOT AT ALL agree with the statement 5 means that you COMPLETELY agree with the statement
Matrisfråga The general impression is that the course was very good* 22 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 0 | | 0% |
3» | | 3 | | 13% |
4» | | 10 | | 45% |
5» | | 9 | | 40% |
I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 4.27 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 2. Five questions about the courseEstimate to what extent, on a scale from 1- 5 , you share the opinion of these statements, where 1 means that you do NOT AT ALL agree with the statement 5 means that you COMPLETELY agree with the statement
Matrisfråga - It seems to some lectures was not really related to "Leadership and communication" for ex. writing CV! It can be teached by ARbetsförmedlingen, Unionen or Chalmers Careers etc...»
- This course demanded a very high degree of work effort, although it took a lots of time, but our analysis skill and writing skill were improved a lot.»
- Very Unique Course. I never had done this kind of course before.»
- I"m usually not this positive in course evaluations...»
- The examination could have been the group assignments, which then could have been a bit "heavier".»
- In general the course was very good. However, some lectures, for example CV lecture and article review, could have been shortened by half. We went through them too slowly.»
- I realy like the feedback which we got after all assignment it was very detailed! »
It was clear to me what the learning outcomes of the course were 22 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 0 | | 0% |
3» | | 4 | | 18% |
4» | | 12 | | 54% |
5» | | 6 | | 27% |
I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 4.09 The examination and the aims of the course were well related 22 svarande
1» | | 1 | | 4% |
2» | | 0 | | 0% |
3» | | 5 | | 23% |
4» | | 9 | | 42% |
5» | | 6 | | 28% |
I dont know» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.9 The course was very well administered 22 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 1 | | 4% |
3» | | 0 | | 0% |
4» | | 5 | | 22% |
5» | | 16 | | 72% |
I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 4.63 I felt that the course had a high degree of significance for my education 22 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 1 | | 4% |
3» | | 3 | | 13% |
4» | | 7 | | 31% |
5» | | 11 | | 50% |
I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 4.27 The course demanded a high degree of work effort 22 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 0 | | 0% |
3» | | 2 | | 9% |
4» | | 10 | | 45% |
5» | | 10 | | 45% |
I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 4.36 3. What elements of the course should definitely remain?- The format of the course is awesome! It"s a keeper for sure!»
- The lectures with Max were really interesting. »
- workshop, group assignments»
- Having a large range of people teaching was great. It is possible to learn a lot with their different experiences.
The venue is nice also, working in groups in such an environment is good.»
- The workshops, the very good grading system of the assignments and the guest lecturers.»
- The structure with workshops and work in groups»
- Max lecture»
- Most of the guest lectures are excellent.I think almost all of them are quite good. Especially Max"s part.»
- lectures of Max Ricciardi, Roy Bartilson and Paul Chan»
- Leadership, Management, Couching»
- Nice with a lot of different good lecturers. I actually appreciated all of them very much. Started to write Paul and Ledarskaparna and realized that I wanted to continue with Andrew and Max as well. :)
Also, the arrangement with workshops was very good. You got time to concentrate on a subject and the mix of lecture/exercises really improved my learning. I also liked the literature which was very interesting. »
- Max"s and Paul"s presentations, the seminar-room at the science park»
- -workshops
-home exam
-group works»
- Guest lectures where in general very good.»
- The workshop about the change in the organizations and the emergency leadership workshop»
- All I guess.»
- guest lectures»
- Week assignment»
4. Were there any elements missing in the course?- No»
- project»
- Should be longer. Bigger variety of lecturers.»
- no»
- more group work during the lectures»
- I don"t know.»
- challenges for your own leadership and communication skills»
- I think it covered a lot, it would have been interesting to learn more about a lot of the different areas but given the time limit I think it was really good. Better to cover a lot of areas than to go deeply into a few. »
- More practical work assignments at the seminars.»
- no»
- Can"t think of any.»
- Negotiation workshops»
- Not really! »
- No.»
- Mord assignments»
5. What, if anything, do you think should be changed in the course?- Well... I believe that the course should be held over 2 study periods instead of just one in order to learn enough about the subject.»
- Maybe it was a too long information session about the home exam. It would be enough with a half day for that. »
- less hours for home exam class, because it was too long.»
- Should be longer. External study visits should be included.»
- too much writing causes stress and affect learnings level.»
- the time of lectures was too long»
- Some teachers are extremely theoretical, who makes the course not so interesting. Slide show is no fun, so more practical knowledge will be better. »
- So far so good»
- As I said it was generally good. The weakest link was Nancy"s workshop. The idea of writing a CV is good but I felt like I didn"t get very good response. Also, in the civil engineering bachelor we did quite a lot of technical writing so a lot of what she did had been covered earlier.»
- Perhaps a more structured examination or an examination through the group assignments.»
- home exam worked individually»
- Maybe one more lecture about dark side of leadership.. Or half a day - Very interesting topic.»
- I felt there was not enough feedback about the CV and Cover letter.»
- Yes. Increase interaction between students and supervisors. This can be achieved through literature seminars on the book, etc
»
- more lectures.»
- Home exam duration»
6. Which parts/elements of the course were the most important for your learning outcome?If there is anything missing in the list below, please let us know! (Comments)Matrisfråga - This course is somethign that I really needed and I believe everyone who is anyone at Chalmers should attend this course or a smiliar in some form or the other.»
- The "+" for lectures are not for all lectures, most of them are "++", but few of them are "-".»
- The course is beneficial in my career.»
Lectures 22 svarande
-» | | 0 | | 0% |
OK» | | 5 | | 26% |
+» | | 5 | | 26% |
++» | | 9 | | 47% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 3 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.21 Exercises 22 svarande
-» | | 0 | | 0% |
OK» | | 5 | | 23% |
+» | | 5 | | 23% |
++» | | 11 | | 52% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.28 Workshops 22 svarande
-» | | 0 | | 0% |
OK» | | 5 | | 23% |
+» | | 4 | | 19% |
++» | | 12 | | 57% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.33 Project work 22 svarande
-» | | 0 | | 0% |
OK» | | 5 | | 25% |
+» | | 6 | | 30% |
++» | | 9 | | 45% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 2 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.2 Ask questions 21 svarande
-» | | 2 | | 9% |
OK» | | 4 | | 19% |
+» | | 9 | | 42% |
++» | | 6 | | 28% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.9 Hand -ins 22 svarande
-» | | 0 | | 0% |
OK» | | 4 | | 18% |
+» | | 9 | | 40% |
++» | | 9 | | 40% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.22 Examination 21 svarande
-» | | 0 | | 0% |
OK» | | 3 | | 17% |
+» | | 9 | | 52% |
++» | | 5 | | 29% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 4 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.11 Team work 22 svarande
-» | | 0 | | 0% |
OK» | | 4 | | 18% |
+» | | 9 | | 40% |
++» | | 9 | | 40% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.22 Independent work 22 svarande
-» | | 2 | | 10% |
OK» | | 7 | | 35% |
+» | | 5 | | 25% |
++» | | 6 | | 30% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 2 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.75 Occasions with critique (feedback) 21 svarande
-» | | 0 | | 0% |
OK» | | 6 | | 31% |
+» | | 5 | | 26% |
++» | | 8 | | 42% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 2 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.1 Guest lectures 22 svarande
-» | | 0 | | 0% |
OK» | | 2 | | 9% |
+» | | 3 | | 14% |
++» | | 16 | | 76% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.66 External study visits 22 svarande
-» | | 4 | | 57% |
OK» | | 1 | | 14% |
+» | | 1 | | 14% |
++» | | 1 | | 14% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 15 | | |
Genomsnitt: 1.85 Other element 18 svarande
-» | | 0 | | 0% |
OK» | | 3 | | 75% |
+» | | 0 | | 0% |
++» | | 1 | | 25% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 14 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.5 Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.27
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.27 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.81* obligatoriska frågor
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|