|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Quality Management - Spring 2012, IEK312Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2012-03-02 - 2012-03-14 Antal svar: 14 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 25% Kontaktperson: Marco Santos»
Teaching and course administration1. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.42 - I could not participate in everything partly because I had another course at the same time as two of the lectures. » (25% - 50%) 2. What is your general impression of the course?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.35 - Kursen var väldigt trevligt, och tydlig. Många gästföreläsare var mycket engagerade och inspirerande. Det är också mycket trevligt att bli bjuden på kaffe och kakor då och då! Bättre än många andra kursen jag läst.» (Very positive) 3. How was the structure of the course?A good structure means that the time spent on each subject is adequate and that the sequence of the subjects is clear and logical.14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.14 - Bra med lite övningar på lektionstid, då lär man sig. Viktigt dock att det inte blir för mycket upprepningen av samma moment, men så som det varit under våren är lagom.» (Good) 4. Concerning the proportion of theory and practice:By theory it is meant mainly lectures whereas practice means mainly exercises and group work.14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.92 - But the practical part took a lot of time sometimes.» (The course had a good balance between theory and practice) 5. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.78 - Because I was not on all of the lectures it was important, but I do not think the book helped all the time when tring to figure something out.» (Large extent) 6. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.64 7. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.21 - The registration for the IA was a bit tricky to find at first. And when you are registered it is again difficult to see it again in order to remind the room and the hour.» (Rather well) Feedback on the teachingIf you have attended at least one lecture of the teachers mentioned below, please provide some strengths and opportunities for improvement for each teacher.8. Andreas Hellström - strengthsAndreas Hellström participated in the first week of the course and provided an introduction and overview to quality management.- Easy to understand» 9. Andreas Hellström - opportunities for improvementAndreas Hellström participated in the first week of the course and provided an introduction and overview to quality management.- The first lecture had so many chapters that were covered in the text book. Hence, I would suggest to either split the first lecture into two or reduce the load in the fist class. » 10. David Loid - strengthsDavid Loid participated in the third week of the course and lectures on communication and change.- mycket inspirerande» 11. David Loid - opportunities for improvementDavid Loid participated in the third week of the course and lectures on communication and change.- More of lectures from David.» 12. Hendry Raharjo - strengthsHendry Raharjo participated in the course in several occasions, such as quality in product development and DoE.- Underhållande ,)» 13. Hendry Raharjo - opportunities for improvementHendry Raharjo participated in the course in several occasions, such as quality in product development and DoE.- Sakta ner lite i talet» 14. Henrik Eriksson - strengthsHenrik Eriksson lectured on applications of quality management and business process management.- Is a good lecturer because he gets the audience interested with jokes and similar stuff and seems very interested in the subject.» 15. Henrik Eriksson - opportunities for improvementHenrik Eriksson lectured on applications of quality management and business process management.- Maybe not have role plays during lectures with students. » 16. Kristian Siverbo - strengthsKristian SIverbo lectured in the last week of the course on applications of quality management and management systems.- I didnt attend his lecture» 17. Kristian Siverbo - opportunities for improvementKristian SIverbo lectured in the last week of the course on applications of quality management and management systems.- Maybe not sit down by the computer, but rather stand up and talk» 18. Marco Santos - strengthsMarco Santos lectured on statistical process control.- Kunnig» 19. Marco Santos - opportunities for improvementMarco Santos lectured on statistical process control.- Förklara vad ett exempel ska leda till innan han börjar skriva på tavlan, det är lätt att tappa bort sig. Röd tråd under exempel» 20. Martin Arvidsson - strengthsMartin Arvidsson lectured on robust design methodology.- industrial examples» 21. Martin Arvidsson - opportunities for improvementMartin Arvidsson lectured on robust design methodology.- Slides were not self explanatory and his communication in terms of voice (was very feeble to hear)can be improved. » 22. Vanajah Siva - strengthsVanajah Siva lectured on implementation of statistical process control.- Tydlig.» 23. Vanajah Siva - opportunities for improvementVanajah Siva lectured on implementation of statistical process control.- Course literature can be improved.» Feedback on the assignmentsIf you have performed the assignment below please give your opinion on its relevance for your learning, the way it was conducted, etc.24. Compulsory assignment "Design of Experiments - Helicopter Lab"- Good exercise, creates a good understanding, but much time spend on actually making the helicopters so maybe change that. »- A lot more to do if you miss the time of the lab and have to do it afterwards but it was good for getting some knowledge about the subject. » - very good assignment, from which we could learn a lot» - Didn"t learn anything. Needed to do calculating on my own to get an understanding.» - Very useful to understand the concept of DoE» - Little bit bad instructions » - This session made DoE easier to understand for me.» - Good» 25. Compulsory assignment "Affinity and Interrelationship Method (AIM)"- Good..»- I would prefer a assignment on the 7M» - Ok» - This Important management tool made me to understand how the issues can be broken down and categorized to solve.» - Good » - It was interesting» - Good, but maybe it"s a little bit too long time» 26. Compulsory assignment "Interactive assessment" or "Oral examination"- Really strange assessment. I think it is really hard to come up with questions and I have never done something like it before, but I think it is better to answer questions then asking them. The oral exam was really good, it was more relaxed then I thought it would be and then it was easier to remember things. So I did not like interactive one because it focus more on producing questions then to really know the subject meanwhile the oral exam focused more on the subject.»- interesting» - Good» - The work load can be still reduced, i.e., the no. of chapters can be reduced» - Just a little bit wierd, » - Good» 27. Compulsory assignment "Business process management"- Good to try it as that facilitates the learning process»- was nice, but probably better after the Lecture: Management Systems» - Pointless. The theory behind it is too basic to spend 4 hrs on a practical example.» - I really enjoyed the experiment standing in a place of an organizational thinking» - not very clear what the purpouse was...» 28. Assignment "SPC - Maryland cookies"- Also good, creates a good understanding of the subject!»- a larger assignment for SPC would be nice: that means more work but also more understanding» - It was yummy on one side and learned how to obtain the x bar chart and R chart» - To easy excersize for the subject. to understand what spc is, make it a killer so people really learn. And give out more questions to practice with. » Study climate29. How was the course workload?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.14 - When it is a lot to read and you don"t really know what to focus on it takes a lot of time.» (High) 30. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.85 31. How well has cooperation between you and the people involved in the course worked?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.71 Examination and grading32. Did the exam reflect the course in a fair way?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4 - The exam was heavy, felt like it was several question as hard as one or two on older exams.» (No) 33. Would you change the examination process and grading for this course?For this course there were four compulsory assignments for you to be able to get a grade. The compulsory tasks were assessed on the basis "Pass", "Non-pass".13 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.23 - Havent done exam yet» (I suggest my system below in the comment field) Summarizing questions34. Would you recommend this course to other students?14 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.21 - But I would like to have more detail on some subjects --> more lessons» (Yes, definitely) 35. Would you apply for other courses in the field of Quality Management?At the moment this is the only course in quality management available to students that are not in the master programme "Operations and quality management". Thus, we would like to know if you would be interested in a "Quality management II" or courses more focused on specific areas, such as DoE, SPC, etc.- Yes, definitely, as i study product development is this vital subject in my opinion» 36. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- SPC DoE more abaout Balanced Scorecard and Management Systems»- The interactive assesment» - DoE and AIM» - Coffe» 37. What should definitely be changed to next year?- As mentioned, in the helicopter lab it takes much time just to make the helicopters so maybe a use a mathlab program instead or similar. »- More material on calculation parts, this is poorly covered in the book. Hand-outs on calculation examples WITH printed walkthrough solutions (lösningsgång).» - The interactive assessment. The structure of the assessment form.» - more detail?» - 1.If possible, exam date can be extended for us to prepare towards the exam. 2.In the exam, there was negative marking for SPC and inrelevant answers will reduce the mark. This should be removed.» - More material to practice with, maybe an interactive process where you leave artificial production data weekly, and the students have to analyze to se what happends in the process. » - Some site visits» 38. Additional comments- Hade känts mer motiverande om obligatoriska moment varit värda Hp, ex 1,5 hp för alla.»- Good focus and commitment from the teachers!» - Thank you for the course, very good!» 39. Comments on this surveyHow much time did it take for you to complete this survey? Was it too long? Were some questions unclear?- 5 min»
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0%