ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Biorefinery, KBT145, sp3 2012

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-02-27 - 2012-03-18
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 32%
Kontaktperson: Inga-Lena Hagelin»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Kemiteknik med fysik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

11 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»5 45%
Around 20 hours/week»2 18%
Around 25 hours/week»4 36%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.9

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

11 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»2 18%
50%»0 0%
75%»6 54%
100%»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

11 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 27%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 36%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»4 36%

Genomsnitt: 2.81

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

8 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»8 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

8 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 25%
Yes, definitely»6 75%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»1 9%
Some extent»3 27%
Large extent»5 45%
Great extent»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»2 18%
Some extent»2 18%
Large extent»6 54%
Great extent»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.54

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

11 svarande

Very badly»1 9%
Rather badly»3 27%
Rather well»6 54%
Very well»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.63

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»4 36%
Very good»4 36%
I did not seek help»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

11 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 9%
Rather well»1 9%
Very well»9 81%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.72

11. How was the course workload?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 9%
Adequate»8 72%
High»2 18%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

12. How was the total workload this study period?

10 svarande

Too low»1 10%
Low»1 10%
Adequate»3 30%
High»5 50%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

11 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 18%
Adequate»2 18%
Good»6 54%
Excellent»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.54 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The Borregaard visit was interesting, but I would have liked some more information handed out since it was included in the exam. »
- I really like that Harald tried to sell in the area, by showing recent research in both the academic and corporation world. This combined with the study visit (very good) and the guest lectures has at least got me interested in the area!»
- The study visit»
- The projects were good but there should more guidelines in how to do the projects.»
- the course»
- I would like go have more lectures on gasification as it was very interesting and the lecturer did not have time to finish during one lecture.»
- Project work, study visit and lectures given by people from the industry are very helpful to understand how what we are studying is applied in the real industry and which are the possibilities of application.»
- The study visit. Very nice!»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The gasification part was difficult to understand from the material we were given, even when I tried to read up on it from other resources, I felt that I wasn"t prepared for the exam. I would have liked the course material available on the course home page. I also think that the projects could have started a little earlier in the course, it was a little stressful as it was now.»
- The gasification lecture was nice, but if it should be on the exam it should be better slides. For example the last question on the exam was about "entrained flow gasifiers", a concept that no info at all is given on the slides (except that the name is mentioned). The references on the first page is to a book and refer to about 300-400 pages. This is not appropriate and the slides need to be more extensive like the ones Harald uses, or the reference should be to a more reasonable source! »
- The material on the gasification part was very poor and it was really hard to study this section. This material must be improved.»
- the type of exams, some more practical exercices and more time to broaden the project»
- A bit less on the wood constituent part. Of course we have to learn some but if you are very interested in that you read the cellulose course. »
- Lectures should be a bit more entertaining and make students participate to some extent.»
- Better guidelines and information about the project.»

16. Additional comments

- Thanks for the old exams, they help a lot! I think the idea of the project was good and it worked well in my group. But I think half of the groups missed the origin point that was about forming a new product and corporation to be able to sell in the idea. The most groups only wrote down what they found in the course material and skipped the last part. I think the projects should be more specific with claims on having economic data ... Maybe give a small introduction to some economic interesting terms and most important: Tell people to be realistic!»
- Borregaard was very inspiring and more focus should be on tecniques rather than wood.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.54
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.54
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.63

Kursutvärderingssystem från