Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Bioinformatics, MVE360, sp3 2012
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2012-02-27 - 2012-03-18 Antal svar: 9 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 75% Kontaktperson: Inga-Lena Hagelin» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Bioteknik 300 hp
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.9 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 3 | | 33% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 4 | | 44% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 2 | | 22% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.88 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 9 svarande
0%» | | 1 | | 11% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 0 | | 0% |
75%» | | 1 | | 11% |
100%» | | 7 | | 77% |
Genomsnitt: 4.44
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?9 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 6 | | 66% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 3 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 3.33 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.9 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 9 | | 100% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?9 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 4 | | 44% |
Yes, definitely» | | 4 | | 44% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 1 | | 11% |
Genomsnitt: 2.66
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?9 svarande
Small extent» | | 1 | | 11% |
Some extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Large extent» | | 5 | | 55% |
Great extent» | | 3 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 3.11 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?9 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 6 | | 66% |
Large extent» | | 2 | | 22% |
Great extent» | | 1 | | 11% |
Genomsnitt: 2.44 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?9 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 1 | | 11% |
Rather well» | | 3 | | 33% |
Very well» | | 5 | | 55% |
Genomsnitt: 3.44
Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?9 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 0 | | 0% |
Very good» | | 9 | | 100% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 4 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?9 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 2 | | 22% |
Very well» | | 7 | | 77% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.77 11. How was the course workload?9 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 6 | | 66% |
High» | | 3 | | 33% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.33 12. How was the total workload this study period?9 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 5 | | 55% |
High» | | 3 | | 33% |
Too high» | | 1 | | 11% |
Genomsnitt: 3.55
Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?9 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 11% |
Good» | | 7 | | 77% |
Excellent» | | 1 | | 11% |
Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The paper concerning Markov Chain are well written and very useful to understand the topic»
- pratical with perl»
- more excursuses of calculation of HMM
more perl help for people not so good at programing
all ppt on the homepage before lecture
prel excersises on homepage at last 2 days before excersise
»
- more organized lectures by lectureres »
- sequence alignment, perl, phylogenetics, markov models»
- Graham! We could ask him lots of stupid questions about basic things about programming we didn"t understand, and he never lost his temper and always tried to help us. »
15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Probably the available materials corcerning the part of DNA sequenceing, metagenomics etc... giving some references in order to understand better some concepts and how some techniques works. And more exercises about Markov Chain Model should be done in class.»
- exam too close after the last lecture. Have more exercies on Hidden Markov chain. Matbe more references to the litterature»
- more excursuses on HMM part »
- next generation data sequencing and applications: it should be more teaching not just presentation»
- It felt like Marina"s parts were a little bit too ... mathematical somehow. I found it vey hard to follow all the derivations and the theory about HMMs since it was quite a long time since I took any math courses and couldn"t really follow all the notations.»
16. Additional comments- Great lecturing done by Graham!»
- i think this cource is to hard for people from biotechnology that have little experience in programming and math »
- Erik questions in exam was not fair ,it was 3 lectures but the questions were from first lecture only !!! besides the focuse of the questions were onlyon 454 sequencing ! especially the last question was not reasonable at all »
- This isn"t really a problem with the course, but more a problem about programming at the Biotechnology programme (the bachelor) in general. This course is considered as one of the track courses for the Biotechn. masterprogramme so I suppose that students who take this course should be able to have the basic programming skills to do the exercises in Perl we had. But I really don"t have the basic skills I probably needed for this course. I found the computer exercises very hard, not only because of the Perl and the bioinformatics parts, but more because I really don"t understand programming in general. I know that this is a topic that gets discussed very year, but the Matlab education biotechn. students have the first year at Chalmers really isn"t adequate enough. I don"t think that I really understand what programming is and how I"m supposed to think when I"m programming, and that"s a huge obstacle.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.75
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|