Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPWPS 1112-3 Remote sensing, RRY055

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-03-08 - 2012-03-21
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 68%
Kontaktperson: Mattias Bingerud»

Read this before filling in the questionnaire

Keep in mind that everyone involved in the course will be able to read your comments. Comments and criticism are welcome, but should remain constructive.

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

11 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»4 36%
Around 20 hours/week»6 54%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»1 9%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.81

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

11 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 9%
50%»0 0%
75%»6 54%
100%»4 36%

Genomsnitt: 4.18

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

10 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 10%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 40%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»5 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

9 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»9 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

9 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»6 66%
Yes, definitely»3 33%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»1 9%
Some extent»3 27%
Large extent»7 63%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.54

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»1 9%
Some extent»3 27%
Large extent»6 54%
Great extent»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.63

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

11 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»8 72%
Very well»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.27

- Lab times was not very clear.» (Rather well)
- I think that the handouts in the webpage was well structured. » (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 18%
Very good»9 81%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.81

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

11 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 18%
Very well»8 72%
I did not seek cooperation»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

11. How was the course workload?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 9%
Adequate»8 72%
High»2 18%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

12. How was the total workload this study period?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 9%
Adequate»3 27%
High»4 36%
Too high»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.81

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

10 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 20%
Good»7 70%
Excellent»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- exercise sessions»
- The handouts from the lectures was good, maybe not hallways very informative.»
- The tutorials and Ole Martin.»
- The tutorials, the lab on the FTIR.»
- The matlab project because the project covered large parts of the course. The project gave me good sight in math and theory for the course. I also liked Ole-Martin how he helped the students. »
- project»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- There was quite many sources of information to learn from, the book, handouts and lecture note so it was a bit hard to find what you wanted and also to learn everything from every source.»
- The lab on the radar should be improve. The experiment didn"t work that well because of a not very good set up. But it was a good lab anyway.»
- The course is good as it is. Maybe more handout when it comes to old exams. I"m personally used to have at least 6 old exams. In this course, we had 3 but still it was enough/ok.»
- more projects or assignments»

16. Additional comments

- there are too many different things to learn in this course, the range of the topics that it deals with is too wide so it"s hard to keep up»
- It was a quite fun course but the exam had many particular questions so it was hard to learn every little small thing.»
- I liked the labs and the matlab project. I liked also how Ole-martin cared for his students, when we seeked help. Thank you!»

Kursutvärderingssystem från