ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPWPS 1112-3 Active microwave circuits, EME102

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-03-08 - 2012-03-21
Antal svar: 16
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 80%
Kontaktperson: Mattias Bingerud»

Read this before filling in the questionnaire

Keep in mind that everyone involved in the course will be able to read your comments. Comments and criticism are welcome, but should remain constructive.

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

16 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 0 0%

Around 20 hours/week» 5 31%

Around 25 hours/week» 6 37%

Around 30 hours/week» 4 25%

At least 35 hours/week» 1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.06

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

16 svarande

0%» 0 0%

25%» 1 6%

50%» 1 6%

75%» 4 25%

100%» 10 62%

Genomsnitt: 4.43

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

16 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 1 6%

The goals are difficult to understand» 0 0%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 2 12%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 13 81%

Genomsnitt: 3.68

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

15 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 0 0%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 14 93%

No, the goals are set too high» 1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.06

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

15 svarande

No, not at all» 0 0%

To some extent» 3 20%

Yes, definitely» 11 73%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.86

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 3 18%

Large extent» 9 56%

Great extent» 4 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.06

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 1 6%

Large extent» 8 53%

Great extent» 6 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

16 svarande

Very badly» 0 0%

Rather badly» 1 6%

Rather well» 8 50%

Very well» 7 43%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- Both the lectures and the tutorials were extremely professionally executed. This must been the best course I have taken during my whole Chalmers period (3½, yrs). Big kudos to Dan and David!» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

16 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 0 0%

Rather good» 5 31%

Very good» 10 62%

I did not seek help» 1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

16 svarande

Very poorly» 0 0%

Rather poorly» 0 0%

Rather well» 5 31%

Very well» 11 68%

I did not seek cooperation» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.68

11. How was the course workload?

16 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 5 31%

High» 6 37%

Too high» 5 31%

Genomsnitt: 4

12. How was the total workload this study period?

16 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 5 31%

High» 6 37%

Too high» 5 31%

Genomsnitt: 4

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

15 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 0 0%

Adequate» 3 20%

Good» 8 53%

Excellent» 4 26%

Genomsnitt: 4.06

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- 1-Both Home assignments should definitely be kept. »
- large signal transistor model extraction»
- 1. Labs was great. 2. Home assignment 1, a very good way to get a feeling of the topic. 3. The very good lectures and tutorials 4. Possibility to run ADS from home 5. Study visit was very intesting, good thing it was compulsary (or I wouldnt attend due to work load of home assignment 2). »
- The laboratory and the study visit to saab.»
- exercises and lectures were really well-structured. tutorials always with summary of lecture content and well explained examples.home assignments comprehensive but helpful concerning the improvements of ads skills»
- The teacher and the tutorial leader. Extremely good combo!»
- Dan and David has made good efforts! David"s totorial have often clarified what was still unclear after the lecturs! Precicly like it should be! Continu like that!»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- 1-In the Second Home Assignment, either make it individual or Put an Oral examination to judge who has actually done the work because in my opinion only 1 person in the group worked and the other one just enjoyed. In the end both will get equal points anyway. It should be changed to Oral exmination so that it can be fairly judged who has done how much work in assignment. 2- Lecture slides should be made less so that they can be coverd at good pace in the class rather than rushing through them as it happend during few lectures. »
- 1. Home assignment 2 was too hard, the learning vs time put in was very low. Bad idea to use group work, it didnt work at all. Many students just leached and didnt care about the assignment. Very unfair. The second home assignment took far too much time, study for the examine suffered greatly. 2. Too little time was spent on mixers, both lecure and tutorial. No recommended problems on the topic at all. 3. The course book. A descent copy of Gonzales was not possible to get hold of. (Very poor quality, feel a apart) »
- Better material on mixers and oscillators.»
- measurement lab should be improved, squeezing of a DC power supply led to gain increase of 5dB ?»
- The second home assignment took too much time from the rest of the course. »
- The measurement setup for the lab. The DC-supplies for the biasing network were a bit disappointing. If you put your hands on it (grounded yourself or something like that) you had 5 dB higher gain on your amplifier. Otherwise it was a nice laboration!»
- The home assignment, might been to big! The are really rellevnt for the course but it might not be reasonable to take that much time! I think the workload of them might have ben underestimated when Vincent wrote them... In the view of how much work home assignment has been, it might not be neccesary to write a report before the lab. Of course students should prepare for the lab, but a report is overkill!»
- The second home assignment concerning computer simulation of a HEMT was not very well thought through. If the purpose of the assignment was for the students to learn how to read completely incomrehensible, ill-written scientific literature (the paper on the angelov model), the task succeeded.»
- The seconf home assignment. Better instructions for ADS is necessary and the fourth reference paper was nearly impossible to read and understand.»

16. Additional comments

- Few exam problems were on a different level than the ones we have solved in tutorials. Even the older exams were much easier compared to the exam we took.»
- The home assignment 2 should be 1 week earlier in the course.»
- study visit at saab was to appreciate.»
- Best course, not kidding!»

Kursutvärderingssystem från