ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPCSN 1112-3 Distributed systems, advanced course, TDA297/DIT290

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-03-06 - 2012-03-19
Antal svar: 16
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 50%
Kontaktperson: Mattias Bingerud»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

16 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 3 18%

Around 20 hours/week» 8 50%

Around 25 hours/week» 4 25%

Around 30 hours/week» 0 0%

At least 35 hours/week» 1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

- Jag tröttna, föreläsaren va inte bra. Han snackar inte bra och han är inte pedagogisk.» (At most 15 hours/week)
- The course was interesting and had a lot of content together with the labs and so needed a lot of time.» (Around 20 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

16 svarande

0%» 0 0%

25%» 3 18%

50%» 0 0%

75%» 6 37%

100%» 7 43%

Genomsnitt: 4.06

- som sagt, jag tröttna.» (25%)
- It wasn"t that good, I did however go to the lectures in my other courses (as they were good).» (25%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

To review the learning outcomes for this course, click here. (Opens in new window)

3. How understandable are the course goals?

15 svarande

The goals are difficult to understand» 0 0%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 8 53%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 7 46%

Genomsnitt: 2.46

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

15 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 0 0%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 15 100%

No, the goals are set too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

15 svarande

No, not at all» 0 0%

To some extent» 9 60%

Yes, definitely» 6 40%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

- Exam was fair. Quite hard to make an exam good though, in this subject.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent» 4 25%

Some extent» 4 25%

Large extent» 6 37%

Great extent» 2 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.37

- NON» (Small extent)
- The lectures were unstructured and hard to understand.» (Small extent)
- Too many things going like in circles. A feeling of not coming anywhere. Teaching better be a lot more proactive. Tell students what papers to read and when.» (Some extent)
- I always read the slides before class, so I attended class with question marks which the professor usually answered. So it was really helpful.» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent» 3 18%

Some extent» 5 31%

Large extent» 5 31%

Great extent» 3 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- I was adviced not to buy the book by friends taking the course previous year.» (Small extent)
- The good things are the papers. Many old, but almost always good. Surfing from paper to paper was interresting.» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

15 svarande

Very badly» 1 6%

Rather badly» 2 13%

Rather well» 8 53%

Very well» 4 26%

Genomsnitt: 3

- We still haven"t gotten feedback on all our labs. Terrible.» (Rather badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

15 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 3 20%

Rather good» 5 33%

Very good» 5 33%

I did not seek help» 2 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- During the first part of the lecture there was minimal interaction between the students and the instruction. Later on things seem to loosen up a bit.» (Rather good)
- The professor and teaching assistant were always there for consultation.» (Very good)
- I would have liked a lab session, It did not work with just asking in class. Some problems we had no idea what was wrong.» (I did not seek help)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

15 svarande

Very poorly» 0 0%

Rather poorly» 0 0%

Rather well» 2 13%

Very well» 13 86%

I did not seek cooperation» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.86

11. How was the course workload?

15 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 8 53%

High» 6 40%

Too high» 1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

- Mostly because the lab descriptions was bad relative to the ones in my other courses. Please ask real time systems Jan Jonsson for help.» (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

15 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 1 6%

Adequate» 8 53%

High» 3 20%

Too high» 3 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

15 svarande

Poor» 2 13%

Fair» 2 13%

Adequate» 5 33%

Good» 3 20%

Excellent» 3 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.2 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- bad teacher» (?)
- What I"ve heard from other students who had the course the previous years is that both distributed systems courses are bad. I did not belive them, but after taking them both I understand what they were talking about. *The labs in this course I think had a good idea behind them but the implementation was bad. *The lecturer was very confusing to listen to. * I miss the feeling that we are working at the edge of whats hightech. In the other courses they took examples from the past weeks of news. (the last lab was intressting tho) » (Poor)
- It had a slow start. Didn"t get interesting until the end. » (Adequate)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- .»
- the last lab»
- Everything»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Perhaps give one large advanced lab assignment instead of three small ones.»
- change the teacher»
- the first lab. lectures(make sure that the first and second course is closely intertwined).»
- More opportunities for students to ask questions. »
- It will be better if we can get more help for lab.»

16. Additional comments

- .»
- just change the teacher..»
- It was a great learning experience»
- Lab assistant Yannis have to improve or go somewhere else. He didn"t correct assignments, and he didn"t answer to emails. Extremly poor, disrespectful and not at all professional. If there were no special circumstances surrounding his behavior someone has to tell him that the way he works doesn"t fit a University. Fernaz however was very good and she seems to have done the job of Yannis all the time. »
- I always had problem in listening to the professor since he used to talk fast and also a little bit accent was involved. The professor is a great guy with a lot of knowledge but unfortunately because of the problem cited above, I couldn"t benefit the class and literatures as good as I expected.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.2

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.2
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.55

Kursutvärderingssystem från