ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPALG 1112-3 Advanced functional programming, TDA342/DIT260

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-03-07 - 2012-03-19
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 36%
Kontaktperson: Mattias Bingerud»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

11 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 9%
Around 20 hours/week»4 36%
Around 25 hours/week»5 45%
Around 30 hours/week»1 9%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.54

- It is hard to tell precisely...» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

11 svarande

0%»1 9%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»4 36%
100%»6 54%

Genomsnitt: 4.27

- All lectures, but no office hours» (75%)
- Missed one lecture, I believe» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

To review the learning outcomes for this course, click here. (Opens in new window)

3. How understandable are the course goals?

11 svarande

The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 9%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»10 90%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- At the start of every lecture it was mentioned which goals the lecture in question was covering. On the exam it was also clearly marked which goals a specific question was trying to cover.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

11 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»10 90%
No, the goals are set too high»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.09

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

11 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 18%
Yes, definitely»8 72%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- Very good exam» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»1 9%
Some extent»2 18%
Large extent»4 36%
Great extent»4 36%

Genomsnitt: 3

- I have mostly used self-studies. So none at all really.» (Small extent)
- Lectures were very good» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»1 9%
Some extent»7 63%
Large extent»2 18%
Great extent»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.27

- I have occasionally read RWH and LYAH, but usually I just rely on my own knowledge and the lecture notes.» (Small extent)
- Did not use the book much. Code examples from lectures were very useful.» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

11 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»1 9%
Very well»10 90%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- Excellent homepage» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 9%
Rather good»1 9%
Very good»3 27%
I did not seek help»6 54%

Genomsnitt: 4.27

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

11 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»2 18%
Rather well»4 36%
Very well»3 27%
I did not seek cooperation»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.45

- My lab partner quit halfway through, but that"s not your fault.» (Rather poorly)
- I had a lab partner in the first part of lab1, but have since worked for myself» (I did not seek cooperation)

11. How was the course workload?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 36%
High»4 36%
Too high»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- Most of the course was quite average, but meeting the deadline of the last assignment was hard.» (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

10 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 40%
High»3 30%
Too high»3 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- But I took three courses.» (High)
- Together with Proglang. technology.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

11 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 9%
Good»7 63%
Excellent»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 4.18 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- AFP is a good course - albeit a bit on the difficult side even with "the recommended" amount of time invested. Mostly due to the labs being too overwhelming.» (Good)
- Very interesting course.» (Good)
- Wish I had had more time during the study period to properly learn everything» (Good)
- Really great course!» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Assignment one and two where fun and educational. The course literature was also useful. The lab submissions system and lecture notes on the home page were well organized and very helpful.»
- Open office hours. Lecture content was good.»
- Grading partly by assignments is a good thing and more courses should do so.»
- Everything!»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- I read the lab specification for the year before this one, and thought that their lab sounded more interesting and well defined. Building a build system in haskell sounds like an interesting challenge. I also think that this year"s assignment 3 was a bit too open-ended, to the point where we had a bit of difficulty just figuring out what to do.»
- Lectures, book and labs were not enough for doing well on the exam. It would be useful with some small optional exercises connected to each lecture.»
- The content of the guest lecture on AGDA felt a bit too rushed. It was not very rewarding. Perhaps one could consider less content at a lower pace. More coverage of haskell type families and such features would be nice. The labs were possibly a bit too difficult - especially for grade 3.»
- However, the assignment didn"t really feel like they were being corrected as though they were to be graded. It felt very much like we got standard iterate-and-improve feedback, which is good as it goes, but I have no idea whatsoever whether or not our work on the assignments was actually good. Actually attaching the grade would be a very good thing. The Agda part felt a bit strange. Two lectures is pretty significant, but with no hands-on part I still mostly felt like I was watching cool black magic. Either stick to the single lecture to stir interest or expand it to some small assignment, I think. The 3rd laboration felt very ... vague. We were uncertain exactly what to do and how much to do it.»
- Maybe some more Agda, and explain more how GATDs work.»

16. Additional comments

- The exam seems to be too difficult & not reflect the course contents. »
- Very good course, hard compared to other CS courses.»
- Very good course.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.18
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.18
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.79

Kursutvärderingssystem från