ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPALG 1112-3 Programming language technology, DAT150/DIT230

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-03-08 - 2012-03-19
Antal svar: 21
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 42%
Kontaktperson: Mattias Bingerud»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

21 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»7 33%
Around 20 hours/week»10 47%
Around 25 hours/week»4 19%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.85

- was boring and aarne only show code on the lecture, he don"t teach how to think.» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

21 svarande

0%»2 9%
25%»5 23%
50%»0 0%
75%»4 19%
100%»10 47%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

- One lecture» (0%)
- Most lecture, some exercis sessions» (75%)
- All excercises, skipped some lectures» (75%)
- Attended all lectures, but not all exercise sessions» (75%)
- The lectures were very good!» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

To review the learning outcomes for this course, click here. (Opens in new window)

3. How understandable are the course goals?

20 svarande

The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 10%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»18 90%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- Should be shown in class» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

20 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 5%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»18 90%
No, the goals are set too high»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

20 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 20%
Yes, definitely»15 75%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

- Some areas, such as lexing, were not checked in the labs or exam.» (To some extent)
- While the exams are a bit predictable, they do consistently test exactly the knowledge the course aims to impart.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent»3 15%
Some extent»4 20%
Large extent»4 20%
Great extent»9 45%

Genomsnitt: 2.95

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

19 svarande

Small extent»1 5%
Some extent»5 26%
Large extent»5 26%
Great extent»8 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.05

- Barely looked at the book, however lecture notes are good.» (Some extent)
- Didn"t really have time to read the dragon book (sadly). The by-teacher written book (i.e. lecture notes) was very well written and covered most of what was needed.» (Large extent)
- The lecture notes book has been a great help. It"s awesome that Aarne has taken the time to write it for us.» (Large extent)
- The book was and still is great, hopefully will have use of it in the future aswell!» (Great extent)
- Arne"s course book is really great» (Great extent)
- Arnes book is great» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

20 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»10 50%
Very well»10 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- One bad thing was that the plt-book.pdf wasn"t updated towards the end (only on google groups, which need registration)» (Rather well)
- Some issues with lab 2 getting corrected, didn"t get feedback until exam week...» (Rather well)
- I heard there were some problems with broken links, but I didn"t notice any of those. The homepage could have been easier to find though.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

20 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»6 30%
Very good»5 25%
I did not seek help»9 45%

Genomsnitt: 4.15

- Lab assistence should answer their mail» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

20 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 5%
Rather well»5 25%
Very well»10 50%
I did not seek cooperation»4 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

11. How was the course workload?

20 svarande

Too low»1 5%
Low»2 10%
Adequate»13 65%
High»4 20%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Good balance» (Adequate)
- It depends on how many exercises you do. I did most of them, which took me about 6 additional hours per week.» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

20 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 5%
Adequate»7 35%
High»8 40%
Too high»4 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- Also a good balance (other courses: advanced functional programming, advanced computer graphics)» (Adequate)
- But I took three courses.» (High)
- I read 150%» (Too high)
- Together with AFP.» (Too high)
- Mostly the other course"s fault :)» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

20 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»3 15%
Good»5 25%
Excellent»12 60%

Genomsnitt: 4.45 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Great course, and awesome teacher!» (Excellent)
- A proper course. I"d recommend it to anyone. Lectures, labs, exercises and course reading was overall very good.» (Excellent)
- Very good course to get an overview of the topic, even though I"m not going to go deeper into it it feels really good to have some understanding of it.» (Excellent)
- The course material is excellent» (Excellent)
- Very good course.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The labs»
- Book and Labs»
- The written lecture notes (in its book form) were well written and should be kept as course reading. The labs were fine. The last few lectures on language design and GF were interesting and should be kept in. »
- The labs and exercises were especially good.»
- The exercise sessions»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The only thing I felt was missing was some notes on JVM instructions (since JVM was mentioned and used throughout the course). Perhaps some kind of concise "cheat sheet" for JVM instructions and how they work could be useful. (It was hard to find something like this on the web!)»
- I couldn"t get exercise sessions" solutions when I couldn"t attend. The reason is they can be useful for next years students to get bonus point. In my point of view it is more important to reach things that you missed than getting bonus points. Also it seems who gets bonus points , actually doesn"t need them. So next year solutions should be published ,I think.»
- Maybe more about functional languages.»
- The plt book could have better explained how to structure the environment in a functional language interpreter - splitting the environment into function signatures and variables, and explaining how a closure can look like in actual code (it took me a long time to figure out that I needed to define it with data instead of type, to get recursion going)»

16. Additional comments

- I only did the labs, as I have passed the exam previously.»
- The format of the lecture notes as a book was really nice.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.45
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.45
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.86

Kursutvärderingssystem från