Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
MPIDE 1112-4 Advanced computer graphics, DAT205|DIT221
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2012-05-24 - 2012-06-10 Antal svar: 5 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 35% Kontaktperson: Mattias Bingerud»
Opening question1. Which university do you belong to?Some of our courses are taken jointly by students of the University of Gothenburg and Chalmers University of Technology. In order for us to be able to look at the answers of each student group separately, we would like you to indicate which university you are registered at.5 svarande
University of Gothenburg» | | 0 | | 0% |
Chalmers University of Technology» | | 5 | | 100% |
Genomsnitt: 2
Your own effort2. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.5 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 2 | | 40% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 1 | | 20% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 2 | | 40% |
Genomsnitt: 3 3. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 5 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 0 | | 0% |
75%» | | 3 | | 60% |
100%» | | 2 | | 40% |
Genomsnitt: 4.4 - Missed one lecture» (75%)
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.4. How understandable are the course goals?5 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 2 | | 40% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 3 | | 60% |
Genomsnitt: 2.8 - The course material depends a lot on the students, so the goals are a bit more general in the description. I don"t consider that a problem however.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)
5. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.4 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 4 | | 100% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 - If the student has no significant foundation in the necessary math or previous solid experience with computer graphics it might seem a bit difficult to grasp some of the more technical stuff. It is not unreasonable though.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)
6. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?5 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 1 | | 20% |
Yes, definitely» | | 3 | | 60% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 1 | | 20% |
Genomsnitt: 3
Teaching and course administration7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?5 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 2 | | 40% |
Large extent» | | 3 | | 60% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.6 - The seminar structure was great» (Large extent)
8. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?5 svarande
Small extent» | | 1 | | 20% |
Some extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Large extent» | | 3 | | 60% |
Great extent» | | 1 | | 20% |
Genomsnitt: 2.8 - During the project the material was indispensable » (Great extent)
9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?5 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 1 | | 20% |
Rather well» | | 4 | | 80% |
Very well» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.8 - The handing out of papers to read before the seminars was fairly unstructured.» (Rather well)
Study climate10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?5 svarande
Very poor» | | 1 | | 20% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 1 | | 20% |
Very good» | | 2 | | 40% |
I did not seek help» | | 1 | | 20% |
Genomsnitt: 3.4 11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?5 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 2 | | 40% |
Very well» | | 3 | | 60% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.6 12. How was the course workload?5 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 2 | | 40% |
Adequate» | | 2 | | 40% |
High» | | 1 | | 20% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.8 - Because it is spread over two study periods, the course has seemingly lighter workload. That could mean that some of the final weeks of the last study period are more intense though (project work).» (Adequate)
13. How was the total workload this study period?5 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 1 | | 20% |
Adequate» | | 0 | | 0% |
High» | | 4 | | 80% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.6
Summarizing questions14. What is your general impression of the course?5 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 20% |
Good» | | 3 | | 60% |
Excellent» | | 1 | | 20% |
Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - Problem was that neither the teacher or the assistants had knowledge in the field that me and a friend did a project in so that made it very hard, but other than that everything was good but the reason for kind of low ratings in some stuff here is because of that» (Adequate)
- It gives students an excellent opportunity to dive in to their favorite CG-subject.» (Excellent)
15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Overall structure and teacher.»
- The flexibility to do the main part of the work in either of two study periods»
- The great talks»
- I liked the student presentations, but maybe it should be only 1 presentation each seminar and more time for discussions to learn the techniques more in detail.
Then again there might be too many people.»
16. What should definitely be changed to next year?- I don"t think there"s something that should absolutely be changed.»
- Try to show off some work that has been done to the students who are taking the Computer Graphics course to awaken more interest. It seems that there were quite few taking the advanced course compared to the initial course and that should be rectified if possible»
- A demo session where everyone can show their projects would have been fun.»
- Should be more strict about the projects and the projects should be about stuff that the teachers have knowledge about so that if problems occur the teacher would be able to help more.»
17. Additional comments- All in all a good course.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.75
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|