ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPIDE 1112-3 Aesthetics of interaction, DAT156

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-03-07 - 2012-03-19
Antal svar: 15
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 36%
Kontaktperson: Mattias Bingerud»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

15 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 0 0%

Around 20 hours/week» 6 40%

Around 25 hours/week» 4 26%

Around 30 hours/week» 3 20%

At least 35 hours/week» 2 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.06

- I only studied 50% but still needed to use more time than allotted for the course. » (Around 30 hours/week)
- it was horrible!» (At least 35 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

15 svarande

0%» 0 0%

25%» 0 0%

50%» 2 13%

75%» 7 46%

100%» 6 40%

Genomsnitt: 4.26

- I missed one day so a bit more than 75%..» (75%)
- Had a couple of mandatory family events.» (75%)
- 75% because some excercises were not mandatory.» (75%)
- More like 90%.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

15 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 2 13%

The goals are difficult to understand» 2 13%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 6 40%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 5 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.93

- I did not read the goals.» (I have not seen/read the goals)
- Seriously abstract and time consuming in a very painful way...» (The goals are difficult to understand)
- I understood the goals as to get an own understanding of the course subject.. This was sometimes the case others not.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

14 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 0 0%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 12 85%

No, the goals are set too high» 2 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.14

- *no comments*» (No, the goals are set too high)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

14 svarande

No, not at all» 1 7%

To some extent» 8 57%

Yes, definitely» 3 21%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 2 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.42

- I am not sure» (To some extent)
- The examination method basically tested if one could manage to write 20+ pages of reflections. An exam of the literature and 1/3 of the portfolio (the project) would have been more suitable I think. » (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent» 4 28%

Some extent» 5 35%

Large extent» 4 28%

Great extent» 1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.14

- Exercises and literature helped more.» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

15 svarande

Small extent» 2 13%

Some extent» 5 33%

Large extent» 7 46%

Great extent» 1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.46

- Not much at all. Everything is contradictory and not very clear.» (Small extent)
- The course literature were sometimes helpful. However, complementary lit. was always necessary to clarify some basic concepts of the course. Some literature was completely incomprehensible. » (Some extent)
- The literature helped but the literature sessions seemed a bit pointless.» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

15 svarande

Very badly» 0 0%

Rather badly» 1 6%

Rather well» 3 20%

Very well» 11 73%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

15 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 2 13%

Rather good» 6 40%

Very good» 7 46%

I did not seek help» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- Only one teacher (and a assistant not seeming to know much) is not enough for 50+ students.» (Rather poor)
- Sometimes it"s difficult to ask questions because we don"t get clear answers» (Rather good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

15 svarande

Very poorly» 1 6%

Rather poorly» 0 0%

Rather well» 4 26%

Very well» 10 66%

I did not seek cooperation» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

- In some exercises the others did not do their parts according to what they were supposed to do and I was affected by that very much.» (Very poorly)

11. How was the course workload?

15 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 1 6%

Adequate» 4 26%

High» 6 40%

Too high» 4 26%

Genomsnitt: 3.86

- The main problem is related to the literature sessions and the later implementation on the portfolio, at some point a bit senseless. Many papers ended like, at some point, a waste of time. We had to write about the concepts of some papers or try to argue against or agree with some researches in which we were completely unready.» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

15 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 6 40%

High» 4 26%

Too high» 5 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.93

- I am doing my master thesis, which I work at around 50 hours + taking this course. » (Too high)
- Again only studied 50% but this and another course would have been too much I think.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

15 svarande

Poor» 2 13%

Fair» 4 26%

Adequate» 2 13%

Good» 6 40%

Excellent» 1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Very "flummig" and there are no real answers or correct things in the litterature.» (Poor)
- Lot of different papers to study, some of them cancelling each other, not actual book. Lots of "small" exercises that cannot be used on a portfolio and do not actually demonstrate reflections on the literature. Writing 5-7 pages of reports on an exercise completed within a day seems not reasonable. The crit sessions were almost useless since they were done in a very limited amount of time, with not that much discussion on them ando some times even no feedback was returned.» (Fair)
- I couldn"t see the real objective of the course, and just before the end of it i could understand what aesthetics were all about.» (Fair)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- literature things. »
- the possibility to have mandatory and optional exercises.»
- The choice of literature is good and the exercises»
- Exercises were useful, although they were carried out without previous information, just with intuition.»
- Sus.»
- Paper readings.»
- The exercises»
- Prices one during first excercise made...»
- The Literature Seminar»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- perhaps a couple of longer exercises instead of the many shorter ones. »
- The type and amount of exercises carried out. A more coherent literature. The way the crit sessions ar carried out and the time spent on creative discussion.»
- The structure of the portfolio. and some exercises that were hard to understand (conceptually).»
- Revise the structure of the literature seminars»
- I find the approach to the literature read is useless and adds a huge pointless workload. This approach should be changed for future years. Also, the lectures shouldn"t be based exclusively on the papers read, since it is doing the same numerous times. Lectures should provide a more practical approach.»
- Rearranging literature sessions and exercises as well as looking over examination method.»
- Fewer exercises.»
- Change the literature discussions, definitely. There was no encouraging for discussions, or otherwise it felt too rushed.»
- The deadlines for the literature sessions. »
- THE PORTFOLIO AND THE HORRIBLE AND HIGH WORKLOAD. »
- I am not sure, what is the purpose of the portfolio but next year there could be something better.»

16. Additional comments

- perhaps a higher focus on more concrete results / more useful applications of methods / more connection to "real projects". a lot of content is very abstract. i like it but know many others who don"t. »
- This course was not for me, and I should not have taken it.»
- Was the first course to almost regret choosing it. Next year students should be able to avoid it. Something i could not do due to overlappings in schedule with other courses. (For example to choose Information visualization and the augmented body was inevitable according to schedule, forcing someone to choose this course.»
- No»
- The number of literature reading could be reduced. Although the papers are really useful for forming the basics but again the time was not enough to understand them properly. »
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.5

Kursutvärderingssystem från