ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPIDE 1112-3 Information visualization, CIU185

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-03-07 - 2012-03-19
Antal svar: 19
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 45%
Kontaktperson: Mattias Bingerud»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

19 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 3 15%

Around 20 hours/week» 8 42%

Around 25 hours/week» 7 36%

Around 30 hours/week» 0 0%

At least 35 hours/week» 1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.36

- Most time spent on the book.» (At least 35 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

19 svarande

0%» 0 0%

25%» 1 5%

50%» 2 10%

75%» 5 26%

100%» 11 57%

Genomsnitt: 4.36

- had overlaps with other courses» (50%)
- All the courses collided with another course i took, so I had to divide my time.» (50%)
- Tried to go to as much as possible because the lectures were really good.» (75%)
- Small lecture room.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

19 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 2 10%

The goals are difficult to understand» 0 0%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 8 42%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 9 47%

Genomsnitt: 3.26

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

17 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 0 0%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 17 100%

No, the goals are set too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

18 svarande

No, not at all» 1 5%

To some extent» 9 50%

Yes, definitely» 6 33%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 2 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- Multiple choice exams are always a little bit "shallow".» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

19 svarande

Small extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 1 5%

Large extent» 10 52%

Great extent» 8 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

- The lectures were crucial to understand easily the mandatory reading material.» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

19 svarande

Small extent» 1 5%

Some extent» 5 26%

Large extent» 10 52%

Great extent» 3 15%

Genomsnitt: 2.78

- The book was very scientific, other materials were really nice to read.» (Some extent)
- Lecture slides and chapter slides helpful.» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

19 svarande

Very badly» 0 0%

Rather badly» 3 15%

Rather well» 13 68%

Very well» 3 15%

Genomsnitt: 3

- The course page had a lot of "fill me up" content» (Rather badly)
- Didn"t have access to course web page, always had to access it from Chalmers library.» (Rather well)
- Not much information but lectures and files were uploaded on a regular basis.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

19 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 1 5%

Rather good» 7 36%

Very good» 9 47%

I did not seek help» 2 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

- Some scheduled tutoring for the project might"ve been good, although we never felt a pressing need.» (Rather good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

19 svarande

Very poorly» 0 0%

Rather poorly» 1 5%

Rather well» 9 47%

Very well» 9 47%

I did not seek cooperation» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

- People don"t really know each other.» (Rather poorly)
- Some did more, some did less.» (Rather well)

11. How was the course workload?

19 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 1 5%

Adequate» 18 94%

High» 0 0%

Too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.94

- Could be a little bit higher, perhaps, especially in the first halve.» (Low)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

19 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 2 10%

Adequate» 6 31%

High» 8 42%

Too high» 3 15%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

- Was reading three courses so no surprise there.» (High)
- I took three courses and I have three children.» (High)
- I read 150%» (High)
- Mainly because I found this course and the other course, simulation engines, very interesting and maybe put more than required work into them.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

19 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 0 0%

Adequate» 0 0%

Good» 7 36%

Excellent» 12 63%

Genomsnitt: 4.63 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Great course!» (Excellent)
- The teacher, Thomas Porathe, is magnificent!» (Excellent)
- Very interesting and fun.» (Excellent)
- It was the most useful course in the whole MSc so far. Plus one of the best professors. Clear, reasonable, understandable.» (Excellent)
- This course was one of the most interesting courses and the quality of teaching was high. The lecturer also made it easy for the students to stay concentrated during the lessons.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- project »
- The lectures are really good!»
- Most everything but the things I complained on.»
- The lectures. They were essential not only to help in the learning process but where really helpful to make much more easier the understanding of the course literature»
- Real examples and exercises»
- The approach to information visualization»
- Guest lectures, workshops, practical usage/demonstrations»
- The project, the lecture focus, the teacher!»
- The book.»
- The lectures which includes the class through demonstrations.»
- Thomas Porathe and his lectures! Definitely!»
- The project.»
- The group works. »
- The chapter presentations.»
- Lecturer, content.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- the multiple choice exam does not force people to read the book at all. »
- Nothing in perticurlar»
- Some of the exercises weren"t described well enough and some could have been changed. For example the exercise with the rocket launch wasn"t very interesting because you cannot make a compelling argument if you don"t understand what you argue for. In some subjects a little too much focus was put on the scientific part, which I don"t believe is that important when presenting information. Some questions regarding numbers should maybe be toned down as well, if you can focus on 0-2 or 2-4 degrees doesn"t help me much.»
- Maybe some intermediate meetings before hand in the projects. More real world samples of problematic interfaces which have to deal with large amounts of information»
- wider range of project topics.»
- More workshop were people can interact with each other more and get consultancy from teacher during the project, tips and tricks.»
- The exercises didn"t provide much.»
- Poster session, divide class into 3 groups, 1/3 standing at posters and 2/3 walking around the posters. Switch groups after 2 hours.»
- The time edit schedule should probably be correct.»
- Deadlines of tasks, course project and literature presentation were too close to each other.»
- Perhaps the seminars, which I felt were the least useful parts of the course (though still useful).»
- We would like more feedback for our work.»
- Know whether the exercises and project are going to be graded or not from the beginning of the course, as well as what part of the grade they comprise. Very important.»

16. Additional comments

- very useful course. more info on usability testing is probably needed for the majority of the students who have not studied this area. however that is probably outside the scope of the course so difficult question.»
- The course in general, was the most interesting of the MSc of IxD&T, not just for the content but the pedagogy and the way the teacher could transmit his knowledge and also motivate us. As a personal observation it would have been interesting to go deeper with more information about interfaces and information visualization.»
- passing score for exam 60% is a bit too high for students from other courses, especially when exam contains terminology (not good at remembering the terms)»
- The course and the lectures were very interesting, but the rocket exercise was a bit too hard.»
- Would love another, practical, course in the next study period, where all of this theory is applied.»
- Great lecturer! Should be kept in the IxD-programme!»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.63

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.63
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.9

Kursutvärderingssystem från