Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPIDE 1112-3 The augmented body, CIU170

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-03-08 - 2012-03-19
Antal svar: 6
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 54%
Kontaktperson: Mattias Bingerud»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

6 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»2 33%
Around 25 hours/week»2 33%
Around 30 hours/week»2 33%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- I think the time spent was adequate and the course was really fun and I learnt a lot!» (Around 25 hours/week)
- I spent the night at Kuggen (with 2 others) the day before the project presentation because we got the material we needed the day before the deadline.» (Around 30 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

6 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»0 0%
100%»6 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

- Every lecture and workshop was really interesting and creative.» (100%)
- great lectures, with loads of valuable information!» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

6 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 16%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 50%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 3

- It was only after the course was done that I heard that we get a pass or fail instead of a grade. If I would have known this I would have spent only 10% of the time and energy of what I put in the project now. It all feels like a big useless waist of time now.» (I have not seen/read the goals)
- The objectives of the course are not exactly clear at the beginning. It felt like we had to figure them out as we went on.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)
- The course literature can be a starting point in exploring this subject and we got a lot of suggested literature as well.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

6 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»6 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

6 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 33%
Yes, definitely»4 66%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- The course aims to give practical experience of the experienced or ‘,lived’, body, and design for embodied experiences. Having successfully completed this course, the student is expected to: - Have experience in researching a topic within Experience Design. >> So this means, read a book? Because that is what we did. - Have experience in summarizing research findings as an illustrative physical example. >> Not really, we only gave a presentation, not a physical example. - Be able to distinguish embodying from disembodying design. >> We did not discuss these words, if I remember correctly. - Be able to design for, and reflect upon design for, body awareness, our senses, or spatiality. >> Yes - Be able to design for the experienced or ‘,lived’, body. >> Yes - Have experience in balancing function and expression in an artifact for human use. >> Yes» (To some extent)
- We had the opportunity to explore and work with many of the aspects/facts/technologies the course is about.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»3 50%
Great extent»3 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Workshops, discussion and tutoring was definitely helpful» (Large extent)
- The teachers were very helpful and dedicated in guiding the student towards getting a good result» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»4 66%
Great extent»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- As mentioned above, the core literature was a good starting point for those of us that were not so familiar with the subject, and then the suggested extra literature was good enough to put someone in the track and get excited and more interested.» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

6 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»3 50%
Very well»3 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- The use was limited but effective» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

6 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 16%
Rather good»1 16%
Very good»4 66%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- The teachers were often gone when you needed them. Being there physically or being available via email is something totally different.» (Rather poor)
- All three teachers were helpful and available for questions and help.» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

6 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 16%
Rather well»0 0%
Very well»5 83%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- Great teamwork in the final course project. One of the most positivce experiences during the whole program.» (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

6 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»6 100%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- The literature sessions were pretty feasible as a workload.» (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

6 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 66%
High»2 33%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- Except for that the project started to late and to slow, which moved most of the work to the last few days instead of equally spread.» (Adequate)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

6 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»3 50%
Excellent»3 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- It could get even better.» (Good)
- Very interesting course! Interesting topics and interesting literature. Great freedom of expression and the possibility to discuss about topics instead of memorizing and writing literature. I appreciated the freedom of finding an interesting project and working on it without worrying about finishing it fast and taking it simple for the usual huge report to write. Great discussions and great collaboration between the teachers. » (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The final project instead of any kind of traditional exams. Multiple teachers from different backgrounds. Workshops, visit to Universeum.»
- The discussions were great, specially with this small group of students.»
- The discussions and open environment»
- Basically all the course»
- the workshops»
- the movies and discussions we had at the first lectures!»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Time given for the final project. Budget for the construction of the project.»
- The project needs to start a bit earlier, and the buying of materials needs to improve drastically. Also it should be easier to find someone to help you than sending an email. It is also annoying that we don"t have access to the 3rd floor, and people don"t open when you ring the bell.»
- More concrete objectives should be defined at the beginning of the course»
- Maybe a little more time for the project even though it was already quite appropriate»
- nothing»
- Having Farshid supporting the technical aspects of the electronics. He is a smart guy bu in my opinion, his help was not adequate. »

16. Additional comments

- Very satisfied with the course by most aspects. I would definitely recommended it to other students interested in the subject.»
- Thanks for probably the best course in the program!»
- The overall impression was very good. I liked the idea about the flexibility to work on the main project. As there were no additional hand-ins, or report writing, I was only focused on the practical implementation of the project. As an experimental course, this is how it should be administrated. This measure provided better outcome of the project work than ever. To be honest, I loved it..»
- Other than that, everything was fine!»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.5

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.5
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.87

Kursutvärderingssystem från