Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
SVM 2011, VTA073
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2012-03-02 - 2012-05-14 Antal svar: 10 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 66% Kontaktperson: Jens Forssén» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.9 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 4 | | 44% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 3 | | 33% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 1 | | 11% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 1 | | 11% |
Genomsnitt: 2.88 - Sorry, but I cant remember the exact amount.» (?)
- Really hard to say, I don´,t remember, but it was quite a lot.» (Around 25 hours/week)
2. How large part of the lectures offered did you attend? 10 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 0 | | 0% |
75%» | | 0 | | 0% |
100%» | | 10 | | 100% |
Genomsnitt: 5 - Might have missed some lecture, but I don´,t think so» (100%)
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus (see http://www.student.chalmers.se/sp/course?course_id=12144 ) states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. To what extent do you feel you have acquired the knowledge, skills and attitudes stated in the learning outcomes?10 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 1 | | 10% |
Large extent» | | 4 | | 40% |
Great extent» | | 5 | | 50% |
Genomsnitt: 3.4 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?10 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 10 | | 100% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?10 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 1 | | 10% |
Yes, definitely» | | 7 | | 70% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 2 | | 20% |
Genomsnitt: 3.1
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent have the lectures been of help for your learning?10 svarande
Small extent» | | 2 | | 20% |
Some extent» | | 3 | | 30% |
Large extent» | | 2 | | 20% |
Great extent» | | 3 | | 30% |
Genomsnitt: 2.6 7. How was the presentation speed in the lectures?10 svarande
much too slow» | | 0 | | 0% |
a bit too slow» | | 0 | | 0% |
adequate» | | 8 | | 80% |
a bit too fast» | | 2 | | 20% |
much too fast» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.2 - Of course it differed from teacher to teacher.» (adequate)
8. To what extent have the lecture notes been of help for your learning?10 svarande
Small extent» | | 2 | | 20% |
Some extent» | | 2 | | 20% |
Large extent» | | 5 | | 50% |
Great extent» | | 1 | | 10% |
Genomsnitt: 2.5 9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?10 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 1 | | 10% |
Rather well» | | 6 | | 60% |
Very well» | | 3 | | 30% |
Genomsnitt: 3.2
Lab 1 Measurements of Sound Outdoors10. How well did the lectures prepare you for the experimental work?10 svarande
The lectures were essential.» | | 1 | | 10% |
The lectures were useful.» | | 7 | | 70% |
The lectures should have a different content/please comment» | | 1 | | 10% |
One could have managed the experimental work without lecture» | | 1 | | 10% |
Genomsnitt: 2.2 - Perhaps a relatively difficult topic as a first lab.» (The lectures were useful.)
- The lecture needs more content.» (The lectures should have a different content/please comment)
11. To what extent do you feel that the lectures helped your understanding of the physical concepts investigated in the experimental work?9 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 3 | | 33% |
Large extent» | | 5 | | 55% |
Great extent» | | 1 | | 11% |
Genomsnitt: 2.77 12. How well was the lab work prepared by the supervisor?10 svarande
It was well prepared» | | 9 | | 90% |
There is a need for improvement / please comment» | | 1 | | 10% |
Genomsnitt: 1.1 - The different tasks where not made in order as the task sheat aid which confused me alot. » (There is a need for improvement / please comment)
13. How helpful was the supervision?10 svarande
very helpful» | | 6 | | 60% |
moderatly helpful» | | 4 | | 40% |
not helpful at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.4 14. How did you percieve the correction of the report?10 svarande
too demanding» | | 1 | | 10% |
adequate» | | 9 | | 90% |
not demanding enough» | | 0 | | 0% |
not relevant» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.9
Lab 2 Sound Power Measurements15. How well did the lectures prepare you for the experimental work?10 svarande
The lectures were essential.» | | 1 | | 10% |
The lectures were useful.» | | 9 | | 90% |
The lectures should have a different content/please comment» | | 0 | | 0% |
One could have managed the experimental work without lecture» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.9 16. To what extend do you feel that the lectures helped your understanding of the physical concepts investigated in the experimental work?10 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 4 | | 40% |
Large extent» | | 5 | | 50% |
Great extent» | | 1 | | 10% |
Genomsnitt: 2.7 - More detailed explanation on how the intensity probe works » (Some extent)
17. How well was the lab work prepared by the supervisor?10 svarande
It was well prepared» | | 9 | | 90% |
There is a need for improvement / please comment» | | 1 | | 10% |
Genomsnitt: 1.1 18. How helpful was the supervision?10 svarande
very helpful» | | 4 | | 40% |
moderatly helpful» | | 6 | | 60% |
not helpful at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.6 19. How did you percieve the correction of the report?10 svarande
too demanding» | | 1 | | 10% |
adequate» | | 8 | | 80% |
not demanding enough» | | 1 | | 10% |
not relevant» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2
Lab 3 Sound Insulation Measurements20. How well did the lectures prepare you for the experimental work?10 svarande
The lectures were essential.» | | 1 | | 10% |
The lectures were useful.» | | 9 | | 90% |
The lectures should have a different content/please comment» | | 0 | | 0% |
One could have managed the experimental work without lecture» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.9 21. To what extend do you feel that the lectures helped your understanding of the physical concepts investigated in the experimental work?10 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 4 | | 40% |
Large extent» | | 5 | | 50% |
Great extent» | | 1 | | 10% |
Genomsnitt: 2.7 22. How well was the lab work prepared by the supervisor?10 svarande
It was well prepared» | | 10 | | 100% |
There is a need for improvement / please comment» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1 23. How helpful was the supervision?10 svarande
very helpful» | | 6 | | 60% |
moderatly helpful» | | 4 | | 40% |
not helpful at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.4 24. How did you percieve the correction of the report?10 svarande
too demanding» | | 5 | | 50% |
adequate» | | 5 | | 50% |
not demanding enough» | | 0 | | 0% |
not relevant» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.5
Lab 4 Human responses to sound25. How well did the lectures prepare you for the experimental work?10 svarande
The lectures were essential.» | | 2 | | 20% |
The lectures were useful.» | | 8 | | 80% |
The lectures should have a different content/please comment» | | 0 | | 0% |
One could have managed the experimental work without lecture» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.8 26. To what extend do you feel that the lectures helped your understanding of the physical concepts investigated in the experimental work?10 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 3 | | 30% |
Large extent» | | 6 | | 60% |
Great extent» | | 1 | | 10% |
Genomsnitt: 2.8 27. How well was the lab work prepared by the supervisor?10 svarande
It was well prepared» | | 10 | | 100% |
There is a need for improvement / please comment» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1 28. How helpful was the supervision?9 svarande
very helpful» | | 7 | | 77% |
moderatly helpful» | | 2 | | 22% |
not helpful at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.22 29. How did you percieve the correction of the report?10 svarande
too demanding» | | 1 | | 10% |
adequate» | | 9 | | 90% |
not demanding enough» | | 0 | | 0% |
not relevant» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.9
Lab 5 Basic Vibration Measurements, Part 1: Accelerometers30. How well did the lectures prepare you for the experimental work?10 svarande
The lectures were essential.» | | 6 | | 60% |
The lectures were useful.» | | 4 | | 40% |
The lectures should have a different content/please comment» | | 0 | | 0% |
One could have managed the experimental work without lecture» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.4 31. To what extend do you feel that the lectures helped your understanding of the physical concepts investigated in the experimental work?10 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 3 | | 30% |
Large extent» | | 5 | | 50% |
Great extent» | | 2 | | 20% |
Genomsnitt: 2.9 32. How well was the lab work prepared by the supervisor?10 svarande
It was well prepared» | | 10 | | 100% |
There is a need for improvement / please comment» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1 - Very well prepared» (It was well prepared)
33. How helpful was the supervision?10 svarande
very helpful» | | 9 | | 90% |
moderatly helpful» | | 1 | | 10% |
not helpful at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.1 34. How did you percieve the correction of the report?10 svarande
too demanding» | | 1 | | 10% |
adequate» | | 9 | | 90% |
not demanding enough» | | 0 | | 0% |
not relevant» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.9
Lab 6 Basic Vibration Measurements Part 2: Laser Doppler Vibrometer35. How well did the lectures prepare you for the experimental work?10 svarande
The lectures were essential.» | | 5 | | 50% |
The lectures were useful.» | | 4 | | 40% |
The lectures should have a different content/please comment» | | 1 | | 10% |
One could have managed the experimental work without lecture» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.6 - Focused too much on how an LDV works.» (The lectures should have a different content/please comment)
36. To what extend do you feel that the lectures helped your understanding of the physical concepts investigated in the experimental work?10 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 3 | | 30% |
Large extent» | | 5 | | 50% |
Great extent» | | 2 | | 20% |
Genomsnitt: 2.9 37. How well was the lab work prepared by the supervisor?10 svarande
It was well prepared» | | 10 | | 100% |
There is a need for improvement / please comment» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1 38. How helpful was the supervision?9 svarande
very helpful» | | 7 | | 77% |
moderatly helpful» | | 2 | | 22% |
not helpful at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.22 39. How did you percieve the correction of the report?10 svarande
too demanding» | | 2 | | 20% |
adequate» | | 8 | | 80% |
not demanding enough» | | 0 | | 0% |
not relevant» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.8
Study climate40. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help of the professor?10 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 1 | | 10% |
Very good» | | 9 | | 90% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.9 41. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help of the course assistent?10 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 2 | | 20% |
Very good» | | 8 | | 80% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.8 42. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?10 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 3 | | 30% |
Very well» | | 7 | | 70% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.7 43. How was the course workload?10 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 3 | | 30% |
High» | | 6 | | 60% |
Too high» | | 1 | | 10% |
Genomsnitt: 3.8 - The workload was higher than the amount of ECTS would suggest.» (High)
44. How was the total workload this study period?10 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 3 | | 30% |
High» | | 4 | | 40% |
Too high» | | 3 | | 30% |
Genomsnitt: 4 - The higher workload was compensated by a very low workload for IPC.» (Adequate)
Summarizing questions45. What is your general impression of the course?10 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 0 | | 0% |
Good» | | 6 | | 60% |
Excellent» | | 4 | | 40% |
Genomsnitt: 4.4 - The first experiment was relatively difficult as many people didn"t have any Matlab experience and/or report writing experience.
The sixth (LDV) experiment didn"t add much to the course.» (Good)
- Really liked the course, it felt useful.» (Excellent)
46. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Relaxed atmosphere during the labs.»
- More time to get into writing reports (which means more time for the first report)»
47. What should definitely be changed to next year?- More time, less work.»
- Perhaps drop the sixth lab as it didn"t add much, and have a relatively simple lab to start with, where the focus is even more on learning Matlab and learning how to write a measurement report.»
48. Additional comments- I rather enjoyed some of the labs.»
- It surprised me there is no attention paid at all to (the calculation of) the accuracy and precision of results.»
- A really good course which included many important parts. When there was trouble the teachers really tried to help. I feel that I learned alot from this course!»
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|