Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Nuclear Reactor Safety, TIF250

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-01-23 - 2012-02-05
Antal svar: 7
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 50%
Kontaktperson: Paolo Vinai»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Teknisk fysik 300 hp
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Övriga studenter

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

7 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 28%
Around 20 hours/week»5 71%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.71

- Workload much depending on background.» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

7 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»1 14%
100%»6 85%

Genomsnitt: 4.85

- Well worth the time!» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

7 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 14%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 28%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»4 57%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

7 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»7 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- it is a few hard to follow the lectures when not knowing nuclear physics well enough» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

7 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 14%
Yes, definitely»5 71%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Good with oral exam» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 14%
Large extent»3 42%
Great extent»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

- Teaching covers what needs to be learned.» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»1 14%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»2 28%
Great extent»4 57%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

- Could perhaps wish for a compendulum of some kind» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

7 svarande

Very badly»1 14%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»3 42%
Very well»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

- No web page» (Very badly)
- would have been nice to have slides in pdf form on homepage!» (Rather well)
- it would be great to have the lecture notes at the course home page.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

7 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»7 100%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

7 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 14%
Very well»5 71%
I did not seek cooperation»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 4

11. How was the course workload?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»6 85%
High»1 14%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

- Depends on background» (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 14%
Adequate»5 71%
High»0 0%
Too high»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

- Depends extremely much on what you did... Sustainable energy futures is for sure not giving any workload at least...» (Adequate)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

7 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»4 57%
Excellent»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 4.42

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Good teaching, and good well explained models for the physical phenomena»
- The structure and the goals of this course.»
- Was a really nice course so everything could be preserved.»
- the professor, the teaching method»
- the way of examination is very good»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Include course home page»
- too many teaching materials»

16. Additional comments

- great job»
- Nice course, I really like it.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från