Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
TEK285 2011/2012, TEK285
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2012-01-18 - 2012-01-31 Antal svar: 15 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?% Kontaktperson: Andreas Hagen»
1. How many percent of the lectures did you attend?15 svarande
<25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25-50%» | | 1 | | 6% |
50-75%» | | 3 | | 20% |
>75%» | | 11 | | 73% |
Genomsnitt: 3.66 2. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?*15 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 1 | | 6% |
Neutral» | | 3 | | 20% |
Rather well» | | 5 | | 33% |
Very well» | | 6 | | 40% |
Genomsnitt: 4.06 3. How demanding was the course?*15 svarande
Not at all demanding» | | 1 | | 6% |
Slightly demanding» | | 2 | | 13% |
Average/neutral» | | 8 | | 53% |
Demanding» | | 3 | | 20% |
Very demanding» | | 1 | | 6% |
Genomsnitt: 3.06 4. Did you buy the course book?*15 svarande
Yes» | | 6 | | 40% |
No, too expensive» | | 5 | | 33% |
No, other reason» | | 4 | | 26% |
Genomsnitt: 1.86 - no need for it» (No, other reason)
- I borrowed the book from the library» (No, other reason)
5. How much of the recommended chapters in the book have you read?*15 svarande
0-25%» | | 8 | | 53% |
25-50%» | | 5 | | 33% |
50-75%» | | 1 | | 6% |
75-100%» | | 1 | | 6% |
Genomsnitt: 1.66 - I"ve just read what are mentioned in the lecture» (25-50%)
6. How would you rate the book?*15 svarande
Poorly written» | | 0 | | 0% |
OK» | | 12 | | 80% |
Well written» | | 3 | | 20% |
Genomsnitt: 2.2 - havent read it» (OK)
- can"t comment due to too little reading» (OK)
- easy to read and good for detailed information,» (OK)
- köpte den inte som sagt» (OK)
7. How useful were the lecture notes? (slide handouts)*15 svarande
Did not use them» | | 0 | | 0% |
Useless» | | 0 | | 0% |
Somewhat useful» | | 3 | | 20% |
Good to have them» | | 7 | | 46% |
Very useful» | | 5 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 4.13 8. On average, how would you rate the amount of material covered in one lecture?*15 svarande
Boringly little» | | 0 | | 0% |
OK but more could be added» | | 4 | | 26% |
Just about right on average» | | 9 | | 60% |
OK but some could be removed» | | 1 | | 6% |
Way too much to absorb per lecture» | | 1 | | 6% |
Genomsnitt: 2.93 - most lessons finished early. so you have to cut hours, pack more content or present differently» (OK but more could be added)
- färre lektioner med mer info på varje tror jag är bättre upplägg. ibland blev det samma info flera gånger kändes det som» (OK but more could be added)
- But there were some repetitions through the lectures ppt» (Just about right on average)
9. How would you rate the lectures on average?*15 svarande
Very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Bad» | | 1 | | 6% |
Neutral» | | 5 | | 33% |
Good» | | 7 | | 46% |
Very good» | | 2 | | 13% |
Genomsnitt: 3.66 - The examiner should be more present to the lectures.» (Neutral)
10. How would you rate the Beer Game Workshop exercise?15 svarande
Very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Neutral» | | 1 | | 6% |
Good» | | 2 | | 13% |
Very good» | | 12 | | 80% |
Genomsnitt: 4.73 - Could be more information beforehand.» (Good)
- It was interactive and interesting to see the natural evolution of the flows» (Very good)
11. How would you rate the group project assignment?*15 svarande
Very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Bad» | | 2 | | 13% |
Neutral» | | 2 | | 13% |
Good» | | 6 | | 40% |
Very good» | | 5 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 3.93 - I do not think that it had something to the course. A simulation on an interesting software could be better?!» (Bad)
12. How would you rate the consultation/supervision for your group project assignment?*Do you feel you got enough opportunities to get tutoring, ask questions etc?15 svarande
Very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Bad» | | 1 | | 6% |
Neutral» | | 4 | | 26% |
Good» | | 6 | | 40% |
Very good» | | 4 | | 26% |
Genomsnitt: 3.86 - we had enough opportunities to get tutoring and to ask questions, but weren"t very satisfied with the answers, because they didn"t help us a lot» (Neutral)
13. In general, how do feel about the availability of teachers?*Do you feel that you could freely ask questions, get help et cetera15 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Good» | | 3 | | 20% |
Very good» | | 7 | | 46% |
Excellent» | | 5 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 4.13 14. Did the exam reflect the course in a fair way?*15 svarande
Very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Neutral» | | 3 | | 20% |
Good» | | 7 | | 46% |
Very good» | | 5 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 4.13 - Have not done it yet» (Good)
15. What is your general impression of the course?*15 svarande
Very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Neutral» | | 6 | | 40% |
Good» | | 6 | | 40% |
Very good» | | 3 | | 20% |
Genomsnitt: 3.8 16. How would you rate Gunnar Stefanssons efforts in the course?15 svarande
Very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Neutral» | | 4 | | 26% |
Good» | | 6 | | 40% |
Very good» | | 5 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 4.06 - He was not enough present to the lectures which is a shame because its explainations at the lectures he did were helpful and interesting» (Neutral)
- Gunnar brinner så mycket för detta änmet så att det blir intressant att lyssna» (Very good)
- He is inspiring and good communicator» (Very good)
17. How would you rate Kenth Lumsdens (guest lecturer) efforts in the course?14 svarande
Very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Neutral» | | 8 | | 57% |
Good» | | 4 | | 28% |
Very good» | | 2 | | 14% |
Genomsnitt: 3.57 - He is enticing» (Very good)
18. How would you rate Andreas Hagens efforts in the course?15 svarande
Very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Neutral» | | 3 | | 20% |
Good» | | 6 | | 40% |
Very good» | | 6 | | 40% |
Genomsnitt: 4.2 - He is great and coperative» (Very good)
19. How would you rate Roger Lindaus (guest lecturer) efforts in the course?14 svarande
Very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Bad» | | 1 | | 7% |
Neutral» | | 6 | | 42% |
Good» | | 4 | | 28% |
Very good» | | 3 | | 21% |
Genomsnitt: 3.64 - Cool» (Very good)
20. How would you rate Christian Finnsgårds (guest lecturer) efforts in the course?14 svarande
Very bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Bad» | | 0 | | 0% |
Neutral» | | 6 | | 42% |
Good» | | 4 | | 28% |
Very good» | | 4 | | 28% |
Genomsnitt: 3.85 - Cool» (Very good)
21. Other comments/suggestions for how the course can be improved?- I was waiting quite long for the course results, due to the fact that the date on the exam was 21st of december. i would have wished that the teacher simply had sent an email to notify us about the delay.
all in all it was an interesting course!»
- I think that the course had a clear structure that could be followed easily inspite of its high volume. it was managed very well so it can cover almost all important notes»
- Visits to the actual warehouses, wholesale distributors, retailors and manufacturers. Possibility of summer internship in a relevant industry in Göteborg.»
* obligatoriska frågor
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|