ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Electroacoustics and Ultrasonics 2011, VTA141

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-01-17 - 2012-01-31
Antal svar: 3
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 30%
Kontaktperson: Julia Winroth»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs
Klass: Övriga
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Övriga studenter

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

3 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 66%
Around 20 hours/week»1 33%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.33

- At the time I did read 3 courses simultaneously. If I would have time I would probably spend more on EAU because the subject is really interesting! » (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

3 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»1 33%
100%»2 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.66

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course. It can be found here: https://www.student.chalmers.se/sp/course?course_id=15653

3. How understandable are the course goals?

3 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 100%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- If I remember it right the goals were not updated? We did not read anything about ultrasonics this year.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

3 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»3 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

3 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»0 0%
Yes, definitely»3 100%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

3 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»3 100%

Genomsnitt: 4

7. To what extent was the laboratory work of help for your learning?

3 svarande

Small extent»2 66%
Some extent»1 33%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.33

- The lab didn"t work out properly.» (Small extent)
- Feedback on the laboratory report before the exam would have been helpful (I have yet to receive any feedback on the report).» (Some extent)

8. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

3 svarande

Small extent»1 33%
Some extent»1 33%
Large extent»1 33%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Didn"t have time to study very much of the literature...» (Some extent)

9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

3 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 33%
Rather well»2 66%
Very well»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

Study climate

10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

3 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»3 100%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

3 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 33%
Very well»2 66%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

12. How was the course workload?

3 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 33%
Adequate»2 66%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

13. How was the total workload this study period?

3 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
High»1 33%
Too high»2 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.66

- Almost everybody read 125% speed this period. » (Too high)

Summarizing questions

14. What is your general impression of the course?

3 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»3 100%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The problem session with Erkin was extremely helpful. This should be preserved. Per"s lecture notes were also very helpful.»
- The contents and the lectures are good! Good structure. Always a good opportunity to ask for help if needed!»

16. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The lab was disorganized and very time consuming. Our group did not receive any feedback at all on our report (feedback before the exam would be beneficial). The lab should be re-organized, and should be an option to begin the labwork earlier during the course.»
- Make the lab work properly and inform about lab time earlier. Since 3 courses end at the same time it is not a good idea to have the lab in the end of the course. The course suffer from that the workload in the other courses are too high during nov and dec. If DSP would be better planned everything in this course would not have to be made in the end, which would be better. »

17. Additional comments

- Good course.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från