Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MTT095 Production Management 2011, MTT095

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-01-12 - 2012-01-24
Antal svar: 23
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 45%
Kontaktperson: Peter Almström»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

23 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»7 30%
Around 20 hours/week»9 39%
Around 25 hours/week»7 30%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

23 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»2 8%
50%»1 4%
75%»10 43%
100%»10 43%

Genomsnitt: 4.21

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

23 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 13%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 4%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»7 30%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»12 52%

Genomsnitt: 3.21

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

22 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»2 9%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»20 90%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.9

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

23 svarande

No, not at all»1 4%
To some extent»9 39%
Yes, definitely»13 56%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.52

- The evaluation was rather strict. The exam rather tested how well the student answered the questions based on the evaluator"s expectations and not on what the student learnt from the course. Most often the expected answers were much beyond what was asked/mentioned in the question, resulting in an unfair result. » (No, not at all)
- Many of the questions on the exam were too detailed.» (To some extent)
- Kan vara mer omfattande» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

23 svarande

Small extent»3 13%
Some extent»5 21%
Large extent»13 56%
Great extent»2 8%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

- Somewhere between small and some extent. But there were many guest lectures. That was ok. » (Small extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

23 svarande

Small extent»5 21%
Some extent»10 43%
Large extent»8 34%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.13

- Slides became most important due to for example the Zandin book being just about impossible to read due to too much information and presented in a quite hard to read format.» (Small extent)
- The slides were not particularly helpful for studying for the exams. The literature was vast and didn"t really help much. » (Small extent)
- knappt läst något ytterligare» (Small extent)
- Mycket att läsa. Läsanvisningarna kom aldreles för sent i kursen. INTE ok» (Some extent)
- but almost only the slides from levtures» (Some extent)
- Zendin book war really hard to follow.» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

23 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 8%
Rather well»9 39%
Very well»12 52%

Genomsnitt: 3.43

- Hard to reach the course litterature stated on the course PM.» (Rather badly)
- Tip: Use the "PIM"-system rather than posting things on the message board, because in that way everyone will get an e-mail about the message. When using the message board it is easy for the students to miss some information if you are not used to log on to PingPong regularly.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

23 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»2 8%
Rather good»5 21%
Very good»13 56%
I did not seek help»3 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.73

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

23 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 4%
Rather well»6 26%
Very well»16 69%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.65

- It would be easier if the PPA-groups had been smaller. It is always someone that slips away from doing as much as he/she should do. I think the problem could be solved through smaller groups. » (Rather well)

11. How was the course workload?

23 svarande

Too low»1 4%
Low»2 8%
Adequate»17 73%
High»2 8%
Too high»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Alot to read though» (Adequate)
- But if the case that was skipped would still be on then I think it would have been too much» (Adequate)
- A lot of articles to read» (High)
- Very much to do in the end of the course, even though it was said to be the other way around.» (Too high)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

23 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 8%
Adequate»13 56%
High»4 17%
Too high»4 17%

Genomsnitt: 3.43

- Very much to do in the end of the period in both courses, but over all it was adequate.» (High)
- The simulation course took a lot of time and effort as well.» (Too high)
- spend most time on another simulation course» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

23 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 8%
Adequate»3 13%
Good»15 65%
Excellent»3 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.82

- i thought most of the course was repetition from old courses. i think that the PPA analysis is unnecessary, it is not a method that is in use in companies. better to add som important general emthods and information instead of the PPA.» (Fair)
- "Fair" only because of the industry visits. Otherwise poor. The course didn"t really meet my expectations. Focus was given much more on exams than individual learning. The exam question hand-ins didn"t really help much. I think it would be fair if 50% of the weightage is given to assignments (during the course) and 50% to the exam. This way things might become much better.» (Fair)
- Very professional lecturers (most of them).» (Adequate)
- Starting to regret not choosing production engineering but at least I know after this course that production (as well as others) is where I want to be.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- A variety of different lecturers on the different topics is a good idea.»
- The study visits are very good, to get a good view of how the reality is like! »
- The company visits!»
- Company visits! Lecturers from companies.»
- The industry and study visits/interviews during the course. These were few good things about the course.»
- the teacher»
- The study visits, especially the one at volvo! Maybe even moore study visits can be made.»
- exam questions every week as well as all the lectures»
- factory visit»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Peter should not be afraid (I"m sure he"s really not) to tell students to shut up during lectures. It is extremely annoying and concentration-breaking to have to hear people talk during a lecture. Too much of that in this course. Another annoying element which was not reprimanded was that people were consistently showing up late for class. People were dropping in constantly during the first half hour of each lecture, also disturbing the order and concentration. Why not just lock the door when lecture starts? Then people will probably learn.»
- Få läsanvisningarna tidigare»
- Remove the Zandin book.»
- *Smaller groups in the PPA-exercise. *Proceed the PPA-exercise earlier in the course since it felt like there was much to do in the end of the course (as usual?). *Divide the presentations into smaller groups. Maybe it is enough if there are groups made of two persons per company, discussing with other company-members. People was getting tired on listening for several hours. »
- a lot more should be included in this course. maybe not wider but definitely deeper.»
- Focus must be given more on learning during the course (assignments etc) rather than exams. This way the student can actually learn rather than memorize things and write in an exam.»
- more company visits»
- It must be easier to reach the course litterature, the links to the articles and e-books didn"t always work properly.»
- don´,t see how the first project helped much for the rest of the course»
- dont know»

16. Additional comments

- Thank you for a good course!»
- Nice course.»
- very good course»

Kursutvärderingssystem från