|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
MTT095 Production Management 2011, MTT095Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2012-01-12 - 2012-01-24 Antal svar: 23 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 45% Kontaktperson: Peter Almström» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.21 Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.21 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.22 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.9 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.52 - The evaluation was rather strict. The exam rather tested how well the student answered the questions based on the evaluator"s expectations and not on what the student learnt from the course. Most often the expected answers were much beyond what was asked/mentioned in the question, resulting in an unfair result. » (No, not at all) Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.6 - Somewhere between small and some extent. But there were many guest lectures. That was ok. » (Small extent) 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.13 - Slides became most important due to for example the Zandin book being just about impossible to read due to too much information and presented in a quite hard to read format.» (Small extent) 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.43 - Hard to reach the course litterature stated on the course PM.» (Rather badly) Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.73 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.65 - It would be easier if the PPA-groups had been smaller. It is always someone that slips away from doing as much as he/she should do. I think the problem could be solved through smaller groups. » (Rather well) 11. How was the course workload?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 - Alot to read though» (Adequate) 12. How was the total workload this study period?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.43 - Very much to do in the end of the period in both courses, but over all it was adequate.» (High) Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?23 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.82 - i thought most of the course was repetition from old courses. i think that the PPA analysis is unnecessary, it is not a method that is in use in companies. better to add som important general emthods and information instead of the PPA.» (Fair) 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- A variety of different lecturers on the different topics is a good idea.»- The study visits are very good, to get a good view of how the reality is like! » - The company visits!» - Company visits! Lecturers from companies.» - The industry and study visits/interviews during the course. These were few good things about the course.» - the teacher» - The study visits, especially the one at volvo! Maybe even moore study visits can be made.» - exam questions every week as well as all the lectures» - factory visit» 15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Peter should not be afraid (I"m sure he"s really not) to tell students to shut up during lectures. It is extremely annoying and concentration-breaking to have to hear people talk during a lecture. Too much of that in this course. Another annoying element which was not reprimanded was that people were consistently showing up late for class. People were dropping in constantly during the first half hour of each lecture, also disturbing the order and concentration. Why not just lock the door when lecture starts? Then people will probably learn.»- Få läsanvisningarna tidigare» - Remove the Zandin book.» - *Smaller groups in the PPA-exercise. *Proceed the PPA-exercise earlier in the course since it felt like there was much to do in the end of the course (as usual?). *Divide the presentations into smaller groups. Maybe it is enough if there are groups made of two persons per company, discussing with other company-members. People was getting tired on listening for several hours. » - a lot more should be included in this course. maybe not wider but definitely deeper.» - Focus must be given more on learning during the course (assignments etc) rather than exams. This way the student can actually learn rather than memorize things and write in an exam.» - more company visits» - It must be easier to reach the course litterature, the links to the articles and e-books didn"t always work properly.» - don´,t see how the first project helped much for the rest of the course» - dont know» 16. Additional comments- Thank you for a good course!»- Nice course.» - very good course»
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30%