Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Genus och teknik 2011/2012 SP2, ITS065

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-01-11 - 2012-01-31
Antal svar: 9
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 27%
Kontaktperson: Erik Bohlin»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

9 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»7 77%
Around 20 hours/week»2 22%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.22

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

9 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 11%
50%»0 0%
75%»3 33%
100%»5 55%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

9 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 22%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 11%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 44%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

8 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 12%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»7 87%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.87

- The course was not very realated to my background» (No, the goals are set too low)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

8 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 37%
Yes, definitely»4 50%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

Examination: Project and take home exam

6. How long time did you spend on the take home exam?

9 svarande

Less than 10 hours»0 0%
10-20 hours»4 44%
20-30 hours»5 55%
30-40 hours»0 0%
More than 40 hours»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.55

7. Howl long time did you spend on the project?

9 svarande

Less than 10 hours»0 0%
10-20 hours»3 33%
20-30 hours»6 66%
30-40 hours»0 0%
More than 40 hours»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

8. What grade would you give the take home exam as a means to learning?

9 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
Average»4 44%
Good»5 55%
Very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.55

9. What grade would you give the project as a means to learning?

9 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
Average»4 44%
Good»3 33%
Very good»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 3.77

Teaching and course administration

10. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»3 33%
Some extent»5 55%
Large extent»1 11%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.77

11. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»2 22%
Some extent»3 33%
Large extent»4 44%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.22

12. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

9 svarande

Very badly»2 22%
Rather badly»2 22%
Rather well»5 55%
Very well»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

- Seemingly no communication between the lecturer and the person who was supposed to handle the course web page. When we pointed out errors on the web page, the lecturer would express his frustration with the other person and promise results - which never came. The deadline for the project was wrong during the whole course, despite there being many complaints about this. Crucial information was sometimes given only during the lectures - which weren"t obligatory! Important info should always be on the course web page. Finally: the course evaluation process has been amateurish. First, the lecturer suggested that we hand in the evaluation with the take-home exam, no anonymity. Then an anonymous evaluation was promised before christmas, and never materialized.» (Very badly)

Study climate

13. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

9 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»2 22%
Rather good»5 55%
Very good»1 11%
I did not seek help»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.11

14. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

9 svarande

Very poorly»1 11%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»3 33%
Very well»5 55%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- Since the sign up for the project never closed and people were late at getting a group we had one person joining our group 3-4 days before the hand in which meant that the project was almost finished when he joined and he got a "free ride"» (Very poorly)

15. How was the course workload?

9 svarande

Too low»1 11%
Low»1 11%
Adequate»7 77%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

16. How was the total workload this study period?

9 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 22%
Adequate»3 33%
High»3 33%
Too high»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

Summarizing questions

17. What is your general impression of the course?

9 svarande

Poor»1 11%
Fair»1 11%
Adequate»4 44%
Good»3 33%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- It"s a really important course that is okay today but deserves to be even better.» (Adequate)

18. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Class room discussions»
- The group project»
- The lecturer is clearly very knowledgeable in the field. He managed some discussions really well, never losing his temper or trying to make anybody feel stupid. It"s good that the course hasn"t fallen to overly relativistic "jämställdist"-tendencies. The take-home exam was really good, it"s a powerful tool for learning.»

19. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- It would be good with more lectucers in a discussion form with»
- Discussions should be moderated. Too often, discussions would deviate into unrelated topics or desintegrate into hair splitting. The lecturer should have the courage to interrupt discussions that are off topic. The lecturer should perhaps be a bit more knowledgeable in some technical fields. The lecture about gender in computing was a real disappointment (partly because of off topic discussions eating half of the lecture).»
- skulle gärna se mer smågruppsdiskussioner. kanske ett extra tillfälle i veckan där man diskuterar det som tagits upp i föreläsningen.»

20. Additional comments

Kursutvärderingssystem från