Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Design Methodology Preparatory Course 2011, PPU140

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2012-01-10 - 2012-01-31
Antal svar: 5
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 50%
Kontaktperson: Lars Almefelt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Maskinteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

5 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»5 100%
Around 20 hours/week»0 0%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

5 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»1 20%
100%»4 80%

Genomsnitt: 4.8

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

5 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 20%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 20%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

4 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»4 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

5 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»0 0%
Yes, definitely»5 100%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- The written hand-in covered all of the course content and gave me the chance to combine all of my gained knowledge into one continuous report.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»3 60%
Great extent»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- The lecturer had an ability to maintain an easy-going discussion in the class while still teaching the course content in a professional manner. » (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»1 20%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»1 20%
Great extent»3 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

5 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»1 20%
Very well»4 80%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- The handouts were used as the main literature source when doing the homework and the written report.» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

5 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»5 100%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

- The lecturer gave the impression of being very available and eager to answer questions and provide examples. » (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

5 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 40%
Very well»3 60%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- My partner were very busy so we had some troubles coordinating meetings.» (Rather well)

11. How was the course workload?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»5 100%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- More workload would have been too much for a 3hp course, but less workload would result in not reaching the course goals.» (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»2 40%
High»3 60%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

5 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»4 80%
Excellent»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 4.2

- It gives an introduction to the design methodologies which I know will be very useful both in the project this spring and in future product development efforts.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The close relation and short distance between lecturer and students. Don"t take away the weekly presentations, they give valuable presentation experience.»
- Exercises on fridays»
- The structure of the lectures with feedback and so on»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Though the information about the report to be handed in was very covering it should have come a little earlier so that people could plan ahead more and also start a little earlier on the written report.»

16. Additional comments

- The small class makes it easy for the students to participate in discussions and answer questions. The result is, for me at least, more confidence when presenting in English in front of larger groups.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från