Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Vibration Control 2011, TME 145

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-12-27 - 2012-01-25
Antal svar: 10
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 40%
Kontaktperson: Viktor Berbyuk»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Maskinteknik 300 hp

1. Which master program do you follow?

10 svarande

Applied Mechanics»5 50%
Systems, Control, Mechatronics»1 10%
Sound and Vibrations»3 30%
Other Master program»0 0%
Erasmus»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.1

2. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

10 svarande

<15 hours/week»»1 10%
Around 20 hours/week»»5 50%
Around 30 hours/week»»2 20%
Around 40 hours/week»»2 20%
>50 hours/week»»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- between 20 and 25 hours/week » (Around 20 hours/week»)
- Civil engineers do not have the prerequisites to take this course.» (Around 40 hours/week»)

3. What is your impression of the introductory session for the softwares LabVIEW?

10 svarande

Not good»0 0%
Poor»3 30%
OK»4 40%
Good»0 0%
Very good»3 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

- Only half of the introductory session was useful. The other half seemed to be more of a sales-pitch.» (Poor)

4. Attendance on lectures

How many per cent of the lectures did you attend?

10 svarande

<25%»0 0%
25-50%»0 0%
50-75%»1 10%
>75%»9 90%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- Great lectures! » (>75%)
- The lectures were difficult to follow. More practical problems would make understanding of the material easier. » (>75%)

5. How do you rate the effort of the lecturer? What could be improved?

10 svarande

Not good»0 0%
Poor»1 10%
OK»2 20%
Good»5 50%
Very good»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- I did not understand anything from the lectures. But I"m a civil engineer so that might be why...» (Poor)
- Much of the lecture consists of the lecturer simply copying what is written in the printed course material on to the board. Taking the course material and applying it to practical problems would be more interesting and beneficial.» (OK)
- less talk about that we are supposed to learn stuff (we already know that) and just focusing on what we actually should learn.» (Good)
- As mentioned above, great lectures! Still, it would have been nice if you had written the page number and section number in the book, that was treated at the moment. Ex, Title: Chapter 1.1 XX p. XX » (Very good)

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»1 11%
Some extent»3 33%
Large extent»4 44%
Great extent»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.55

7. How do you rate the effort of the industrial lecturer - Ingemar Carlen.

8 svarande

Not good»1 12%
Poor»0 0%
OK»2 25%
Good»5 62%
Very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- Could not relate it to the subject. » (Not good)
- Nice to hear about how they work in the industry and what applications there are.» (Good)
- If this was the lecture on wind turbines - I would say that the lecture was interesting and well done, however the material did not help in achieving the learning outcome of the course.» (Good)

8. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

What did you think about the textbook Vibration Dynamics and Control?

10 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»9 90%
Great extent»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.1

- It lacks grammar in any extent and often suffers from poor spelling. It has to be corrected to next year. » (Large extent)
- Many steps are left out which would be very helpful in understanding of the material. I understand that this may be done to make the book concise, however some more in depth explanations would be VERY helpful.» (Large extent)

9. Was the course literature worth its price?

Do you consider that the course literature was worth its price? As a guideline the student union at Chalmers has set is at 70 sKr/hp.

10 svarande

1 (not worth it)»0 0%
0 0%
0 0%
3 30%
5 (well worth it)»7 70%
Did not buy the book»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4.7

10. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

10 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»6 60%
Very well»4 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- would have been good with a better structure at the home page. it was a mess... » (Rather well)
- Almost very well, but i remember that we didn"t got the handout for part 4 (The lab) until the lab started. Would have been easier to get it earlier for preparation and so. » (Rather well)

11. How would you rate the project work?

10 svarande

Not good»0 0%
Poor»2 20%
Ok»4 40%
Good»4 40%
Very good»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- This may be due to that I"m a civil engineer. I spent more time on the project than the entire course is supposed to take. » (Poor)
- The project work was very time consuming, and relied on MatLab programming more than anything else. » (Ok)
- The project was a big challenge, but a great challenge since you learned a lot! » (Good)

12. How do you rate the efforts of the course assistants?

10 svarande

Not good»0 0%
Poor»1 10%
Ok»5 50%
Good»2 20%
Very good»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Stephan was awesome! Milad caused more problems than he solved. » (Ok)
- Maybe you need 1 or 2 more assistants. Sometimes we waited very long for help, even if the did their best. » (Good)
- The course assistants were very helpful. Sometimes a response via email would not arrive for a few days - It would be great to simply get an email acknowledging the receipt of the question, and that a response would come in a few days.» (Very good)

13. What is your impression of the VC project assignments?

10 svarande

Not good»0 0%
Poor»3 30%
Ok»4 40%
Good»2 20%
Very good»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.1

- This may be due to that I"m a civil engineer.» (Poor)
- Nice, they get into each other so that you can see a path.» (Good)

14. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

9 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»2 22%
Very good»7 77%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.77

- This may be due to that I"m a civil engineer. But I needed a lot of help!» (Rather poor)

15. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

10 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 10%
Very well»9 90%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

16. How was the course workload?

10 svarande

1 (too low)»0 0%
0 0%
3 30%
5 50%
5 (too high)»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- high (as it should be at chalmers)» (4)
- This may be due to that I"m a civil engineer.» (5 (too high))

17. How well did the course fullfill your expectations?

10 svarande

1 (not at all)»0 0%
3 30%
4 40%
2 20%
5 (very well)»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.1

- This may be due to that I"m a civil engineer. I thought the focus would be different» (2)

18. What is your general impression of the course?

10 svarande

Poor»1 10%
Fair»1 10%
Adequate»3 30%
Good»4 40%
Excellent»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

- suite» (Adequate)

19. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Lab»

20. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Not definitely, but the papers review project seemed to be frightening. So didn"t do that since it sounded like a lot of extra work. If not so, it might be a good idea to point that out.»
- More examples of problems and solutions in class.»

21. Do you think that the exam reflected the course well?

9 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 33%
Large extent»2 22%
Great extent»3 33%
Erasmus»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.22

- Should say it was a fair exam. Maybe to much calculations in third task, finding determinants of a 4x4 and then find the roots are really time consuming (unless you have a computer).» (Great extent)

22. Additional comments

- Writ it on the home page that it does not suit Civil engineers or Sound and vibration students. »
- Think there is a lot of applications out there, that would be nice to mension in the course. Like: This is how it is in reality, and we could model it as:..... The lab was fun and should be preserved »

Kursutvärderingssystem från