Visa resultat

Vibration Control 2011, TME 145

1. Which master program do you follow?

Applied Mechanics»		5		50%
Systems, Control, Mechatronics»		1		10%
Sound and Vibrations»		3		30%
Other Master program»		0		0%
Erasmus»		1		10%

Genomsnitt: 2.1

2. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

10 svarande

<15 hours/week»»		1		10%
Around 20 hours/week»»		5		50%
Around 30 hours/week»»		2		20%
Around 40 hours/week»»		2		20%
>50 hours/week»»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- between 20 and 25 hours/week » (Around 20 hours/week»)
- Civil engineers do not have the prerequisites to take this course.» (Around 40 hours/week»)

3. What is your impression of the introductory session for the softwares LabVIEW?

Not good»		0		0%
Poor»		3		30%
OK»		4		40%
Good»		0		0%
Very good»		3		30%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

- Only half of the introductory session was useful. The other half seemed to be more of a sales-pitch.» (Poor)

4. Attendance on lectures

10 svarande

<25%»		0		0%
25-50%»		0		0%
50-75%»		1		10%
>75%»		9		90%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- Great lectures! » (>75%)
- The lectures were difficult to follow. More practical problems would make understanding of the material easier. » (>75%)

5. How do you rate the effort of the lecturer? What could be improved?

Not good»		0		0%
Poor»		1		10%
OK»		2		20%
Good»		5		50%
Very good»		2		20%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- I did not understand anything from the lectures. But I"m a civil engineer so that might be why...» (Poor)
- Much of the lecture consists of the lecturer simply copying what is written in the printed course material on to the board. Taking the course material and applying it to practical problems would be more interesting and beneficial.» (OK)
- less talk about that we are supposed to learn stuff (we already know that) and just focusing on what we actually should learn.» (Good)
- As mentioned above, great lectures! Still, it would have been nice if you had written the page number and section number in the book, that was treated at the moment. Ex, Title: Chapter 1.1 XX p. XX » (Very good)

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		1		11%
Some extent»		3		33%
Large extent»		4		44%
Great extent»		1		11%

Genomsnitt: 2.55

7. How do you rate the effort of the industrial lecturer - Ingemar Carlen.

Not good»		1		12%
Poor»		0		0%
OK»		2		25%
Good»		5		62%
Very good»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- Could not relate it to the subject. » (Not good)
- Nice to hear about how they work in the industry and what applications there are.» (Good)
- If this was the lecture on wind turbines - I would say that the lecture was interesting and well done, however the material did not help in achieving the learning outcome of the course.» (Good)

8. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»		0		0%
Some extent»		0		0%
Large extent»		9		90%
Great extent»		1		10%

Genomsnitt: 3.1

- It lacks grammar in any extent and often suffers from poor spelling. It has to be corrected to next year. » (Large extent)
- Many steps are left out which would be very helpful in understanding of the material. I understand that this may be done to make the book concise, however some more in depth explanations would be VERY helpful.» (Large extent)

9. Was the course literature worth its price?

10 svarande

1 (not worth it)»		0		0%
2»		0		0%
3»		0		0%
4»		3		30%
5 (well worth it)»		7		70%
Did not buy the book»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 4.7

10. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

Very badly»		0		0%
Rather badly»		0		0%
Rather well»		6		60%
Very well»		4		40%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- would have been good with a better structure at the home page. it was a mess... » (Rather well)
- Almost very well, but i remember that we didn"t got the handout for part 4 (The lab) until the lab started. Would have been easier to get it earlier for preparation and so. » (Rather well)

11. How would you rate the project work?

Not good»		0		0%
Poor»		2		20%
Ok»		4		40%
Good»		4		40%
Very good»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- This may be due to that I"m a civil engineer. I spent more time on the project than the entire course is supposed to take. » (Poor)
- The project work was very time consuming, and relied on MatLab programming more than anything else. » (Ok)
- The project was a big challenge, but a great challenge since you learned a lot! » (Good)

12. How do you rate the efforts of the course assistants?

Not good»		0		0%
Poor»		1		10%
Ok»		5		50%
Good»		2		20%
Very good»		2		20%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Stephan was awesome! Milad caused more problems than he solved. » (Ok)
- Maybe you need 1 or 2 more assistants. Sometimes we waited very long for help, even if the did their best. » (Good)
- The course assistants were very helpful. Sometimes a response via email would not arrive for a few days - It would be great to simply get an email acknowledging the receipt of the question, and that a response would come in a few days.» (Very good)

13. What is your impression of the VC project assignments?

Not good»		0		0%
Poor»		3		30%
Ok»		4		40%
Good»		2		20%
Very good»		1		10%

Genomsnitt: 3.1

- This may be due to that I"m a civil engineer.» (Poor)
- Nice, they get into each other so that you can see a path.» (Good)

14. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

Very poor»		0		0%
Rather poor»		2		22%
Very good»		7		77%
I did not seek help»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.77

- This may be due to that I"m a civil engineer. But I needed a lot of help!» (Rather poor)

15. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

Very poorly»		0		0%
Rather poorly»		1		10%
Very well»		9		90%
I did not seek cooperation»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

16. How was the course workload?

1 (too low)»		0		0%
2»		0		0%
3»		3		30%
4»		5		50%
5 (too high)»		2		20%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- high (as it should be at chalmers)» (4)
- This may be due to that I"m a civil engineer.» (5 (too high))

17. How well did the course fullfill your expectations?

1 (not at all)»		0		0%
2»		3		30%
3»		4		40%
4»		2		20%
5 (very well)»		1		10%

Genomsnitt: 3.1

- This may be due to that I"m a civil engineer. I thought the focus would be different» (2)

18. What is your general impression of the course?

Poor»		1		10%
Fair»		1		10%
Adequate»		3		30%
Good»		4		40%
Excellent»		1		10%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

- suite» (Adequate)

19. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

20. What should definitely be changed to next year?

21. Do you think that the exam reflected the course well?

Small extent»		0		0%
Some extent»		3		33%
Large extent»		2		22%
Great extent»		3		33%
Erasmus»		1		11%

Genomsnitt: 3.22

- Should say it was a fair exam. Maybe to much calculations in third task, finding determinants of a 4x4 and then find the roots are really time consuming (unless you have a computer).» (Great extent)

22. Additional comments