Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Finite Element Simulation in Design 2011 (TME125), TME125

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-12-23 - 2012-01-31
Antal svar: 5
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 20%
Kontaktperson: Lars Almefelt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Maskinteknik 300 hp
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Maskinteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

5 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»1 20%
Around 25 hours/week»3 60%
Around 30 hours/week»1 20%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

5 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»2 40%
100%»3 60%

Genomsnitt: 4.6

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

5 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 80%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

5 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»4 80%
No, the goals are set too high»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

5 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 80%
Yes, definitely»1 20%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

- The voluntary assignments should be more even in difficulty and time needed. If so, I would have completed all three and gotten a 5 instead of a 4 with two unnecessary extra credits (got 9 points on the exam). I truly believe I"ve gained enough knowledge to back up a 5 when it comes to practical use of the course content, but when you have other exams and extra courses I had to take (design methodology) because I didn"t take my bachelors at Chalmers it"s too time consuming to write a step-by-step guide.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 20%
Large extent»1 20%
Great extent»3 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 60%
Large extent»2 40%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

- I used the book only to have the equations available during the exam. The lectures itself alradey includes all necessary topics.» (Some extent)
- Old exams were good for preparing the exam! Course book was not realy helpfull for my learning.» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

5 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»3 60%
Very well»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- Everything should be uploaded from the start instead of waiting to upload material (previous exams, assignments, etc)» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

5 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 40%
Very good»3 60%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- It was very easy to get help from the teacher and the assistants during the lectures and exercises, but one of the assistants didn"t have sufficient knowledge in Femap as he gave me, on several occasions, guidance that later turned out to be wrong when the teacher or the other assistant was contacted. » (Rather good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

5 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 20%
Very well»4 80%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- I think I was lucky when it comes to collaboration partner. I saw that several others had problems with unevenly divided workload. » (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 60%
High»1 20%
Too high»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- The workload was as it could be expected from a challenging course. The course should not be easy but challenging, if not it"s not perceived as rewarding to complete the course.» (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»1 20%
High»4 80%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

5 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 20%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»3 60%
Excellent»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The assignments »
- The online book»
- Mandantory assignments»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Upload all material that is relevant for the students as early as possible. Students work in different paces and if some have a slow period in another course they should be able to do an extra effort in the FEM course, either by starting early on voluntary assignments or starting solving exam problems.»
- make the project/lab less timeconsuming, it"s too much to do and to little time to do it»

16. Additional comments

- It could be desirable with a more in-depth follow-up course. I know I would have chosen it.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från