ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Strategy and Marketing for a Knowledge Based Business 2011, CIP081

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-12-21 - 2012-01-09
Antal svar: 10
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 33%
Kontaktperson: Tobias Fredberg»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

Overall impression

1. What is your general impression of the course?

10 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
Ok»0 0%
Good»3 30%
Very good»7 70%

Genomsnitt: 4.7 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Very applicable to the course. » (Very good)

2. Would you recommend this course to other students?

10 svarande

Yes»10 100%
No»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.7

Your own effort

3. Which master program do you study?

10 svarande

CSE»9 90%
GIBBS»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 1.1

4. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

10 svarande

At most 5 hours/week»0 0%
Around 10 hours/week»5 50%
Around 15 hours/week»3 30%
Around 20 hours/week»1 10%
At least 25 hours/week»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- Hard to estimate as it has been going for the entire semester. » (Around 10 hours/week)
- Some weeks had no lectures or hand ins.» (Around 10 hours/week)
- Or maybe a little more. Difficult to say. » (Around 10 hours/week)
- I would have liked to have part of the course next semester and not rush though it.» (Around 15 hours/week)

5. How large part of the course sessions did you attend?

We here refer both to the lectures and the case discussions.

10 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»6 60%
100%»4 40%

Genomsnitt: 4.4

- As much as possible. Good classes in general. » (75%)
- Every class I could besides the ones when I was sick.» (75%)
- Missed just afew hours» (100%)
- I missed one occasion due to sickness & because of a deadline within the project.» (100%)

Goals fulfilment and examination

The course syllabus and the lectures have stated that the goal with the course is to help you prepare for your business plan, to give you a repertoire of different tools and models in strategy and to help you develop professional judgment.

6. To what extent did you learn what you were supposed to gain from the course?

Please answer to what extent you learnt what you could expect from the course

10 svarande

Not at all»0 0%
Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 10%
Large extent»9 90%
It was clear what I could expect»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.9 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Leart it even better when i applued the theoreticsl learnings to our project» (Some extent)
- Much of what was thought has been vary applicable.» (Large extent)

7. What would you have preferred as examination form?

The course used two team papers, one individual paper, and to some degree contributions in class as the main examination forms. You can here indicate what you think would be appropriate ways of examination. Please click all alternatives that apply.

10 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

Written term papers based on your team work»6 60%
Indivdual term papers»6 60%
Smaller diagnostic tests»2 20%
Exercises in class»3 30%
Large traditional written test»0 0%
Presentations in class»5 50%
No opinion»1

- Think the examination has beem good. » (Written term papers based on your team work, Indivdual term papers)
- It would have been interesting to have the last paper be a reflection paper of what one has learnet from the entire course and give examples how to illustate it. » (Indivdual term papers)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.9

Teaching and course administration

8. To what extent did the lectures contribute to your understanding?

9 svarande

Not at all»0 0%
Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»6 66%
I learnt a lot»3 33%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 4.33 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Both the guest lecurers and Tobias have been brilliant. » (I learnt a lot)

9. What did you think of the fact that your projects played a major role as bases for learning and analysis?

10 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
Ok»0 0%
Good»2 20%
Very good»8 80%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 4.8 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

10. How well did the course administration work?

10 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Ok»3 30%
Rather well»5 50%
Very well»2 20%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.9 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The results take time to get, as for many other courses this fall.» (Ok)

11. What is your general impression of the set of lecturers that were engaged in the course

10 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Weak»0 0%
Ok»0 0%
Good»5 50%
Very good»5 50%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 4.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- So many diffrent people where involved in this course and I appriciated it.» (Very good)

12. How would you rate the lecturers in the course?

Matrisfråga

- Didn"t attended at mr Dahlsten"s class. »
- did not attend fredrik dahlsten»
- I missed Fredrik Dahlsten unforunatly. »

Tobias Fredberg (main lecturer)
10 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Weak»0 0%
Ok»0 0%
Good»1 10%
Very good»9 90%

Genomsnitt: 4.9

Fredrik Dahlsten (market strategy)
8 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Weak»0 0%
Ok»3 37%
Good»2 25%
Very good»3 37%

Genomsnitt: 4

Henrik Berglund (business model development)
9 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Weak»0 0%
Ok»0 0%
Good»2 22%
Very good»7 77%

Genomsnitt: 4.77

Mårten Westlund (communication strategy)
10 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Weak»0 0%
Ok»0 0%
Good»5 50%
Very good»5 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.38

Study climate

13. To what extent did you feel that you could approach the lecturers to ask questions?

10 svarande

The lecturers were hostile to questions»0 0%
It felt very awkward»0 0%
It was ok»1 10%
It felt comfortable»5 50%
The lecturers were open to questions»4 40%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 4.3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.3

For next year...

Please help us to further develop the course!

14. What was the strongest thing about the course for you (if anything)?

Please help us understand what you appreciated most about the course (given that you appreciated anything).

- The concept. It is in general very connected to the classes. »
- Project focus and that lecturers were engaged»
- The you can apply what you learn on your project work»
- The seminar approach and the openess to ask qustions to the lecturers. »
- More focus on the own project»
- It has given me a good toolbox with strategic tools that can be applied both in this project as well as in other jobs. Good level of the discussions in class.»
- Henrik Berglund business model feedback and discussion.»

15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Mr fredberg»
- The team papers»
- The couse layout, the lecturers and the focus on the projects.»
- The lecture with Henrik Berglund. »
- The work-shop like lectures. The lecturers. »
- Henrik Berglund, at least for IT-startups»

16. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- More individual assignments.»
- More lectures on how to develop a "minimum viable product"»
- Maybe add some more real cases and bring in representatives from e.g. Volvo that can relate the work.shop with how they perform their business.»

17. Additional comments

- Great course.»
- It is a very good couse that definately should be kept for many years.»
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.34
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.83

Kursutvärderingssystem från