ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Cognitive ergonomics (2011), MPP036

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-12-19 - 2012-01-11
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 52%
Kontaktperson: Oskar Rexfelt»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

11 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»4 36%
Around 25 hours/week»4 36%
Around 30 hours/week»3 27%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- less than 25 h in the beginning of the course and more in the end. » (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

11 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 9%
50%»2 18%
75%»6 54%
100%»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.81

- Kunde redan visst av innehållet, kollade vad föreläsningarna handlade om i förväg. » (50%)
- Had another course in the same block so had to choose between lectures sometimes.» (75%)
- Great and inspiring lectures.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

11 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 9%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 36%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»6 54%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

10 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»9 90%
No, the goals are set too high»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.1

- Still I noticed that some students didn"t have the prerequisites described needed for attending the course » (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

11 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 18%
Yes, definitely»8 72%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»1 9%
Some extent»5 45%
Large extent»5 45%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.36

- The lectures were interesting, but it was hard to find a connection between the lectures and the literature. A red line was missing in the course.» (Some extent)
- The methods and simplification of methods were good described at lectures. » (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 30%
Large extent»6 60%
Great extent»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- It was too much literature. A lot of the literature did not make sense regarding the topic. A smaller amount of literature with relevant facts would have been better. And it would have been easier due to the time limitation to deeper the knowledge in the right areas. » (Some extent)
- Good to receive hand-picked literature to read. Feels more accurate» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

11 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»6 54%
Very well»5 45%

Genomsnitt: 3.45

- Some of the literature had a bad print quality and was hard to read - Too much darkness and too small font type - which is quite ironic since the course is in Cognitive Ergonomics. And also it does not correspond to Chalmers sustainability profile to have such large amount of printed literature.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»4 36%
Very good»5 45%
I did not seek help»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.81

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

11 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 9%
Rather well»3 27%
Very well»7 63%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.54

11. How was the course workload?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 27%
High»7 63%
Too high»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.81

- High but in a good way» (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 36%
High»4 36%
Too high»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- Except for bad luck with having two courses in the same teaching block.» (Adequate)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

11 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 9%
Adequate»1 9%
Good»6 54%
Excellent»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 4

- There were so many methods that we needed to get done that we didn"t have time for any thinking of our own. » (Fair)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- literature study»
- The project with the 10 assignments to get an overview of an ergonomics project»
- case study»
- The lectures»
- The different lectures.»
- Learning all methods, reading the articles.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Don"t keep all the methods as a manditory part because they are not suited to all products, let the students decide which methods that are relevant to their project. Using methods that does not add anything to your project is boring and time consuming, which affected my attitude to the project and the course negatively.»
- According to the workload, the course should be ran into 2 periods and get 15 credits. And it will reduce the workload compressed in one period and it will the students to get a deeper knowledge on their case study.»
- case studies should preferably be together with companies»
- Not that much repetition from earlier courses, that would be pre-requirments for reading this course (like HTA etc)»
- I think the project could be broken down into several hand in reports. I think this would give an incitament to start with the different parts earlier (although this wasn"t possible since lectures needed was sometimes a bit late) and also make the task easier to overview.»
- It could be good with even more lectures in the beginning going through methods, leaving more time for the execution and analyzing of the project in the end of the reading period»
- Less amount of literature. Less assignment in the project or larger project groups (The scoop of the project was too big for two students). It would be good to have seminars were the project groups could discuss how they have applied the methods presented in the course.»

16. Additional comments

- One thing that was strange were that one group could choose a product which dosen"t exist and when we asked there had to been at least two expert users. »
- Due to the comprehensive project the project report turned out to be very long, which is very time consuming. Sometime that take to much time so you have to spend less on actually execute and learn methods. Still difficult to determine if it would be better not having to write everything in a complete report. »

Kursutvärderingssystem från